bushido_man96

If someone could download a video of this side snap kick, and a video of the regular side thrust kick, I would appreciate it. Then, I could see the difference in the delivery. When I do a side kick, I guess a snapping kick would be off of my front leg, without as much hip rotation, but still pivoting the base foot. If I am getting close here, let me know.

I think shootboxing can be very good for self-defense. I think it has a pretty high level of contact in the competition side, and you get striking and takedowns, and I think groundwork. If the Wing Chun club won't contact you back, go drop in on a class. Watch and see what it is like.

The problem with this statement is that you are assuming the yellow sash understands and performs the material as well as they would at a higher level. This isn't true. Just because I may have learned Seisan to receive my green belt doesn't mean at that point I was as qualified to teach it. My current years of experience have given me insight and refinement to my kata that enables me to teach it with a deeper understanding than I ever could have at greenbelt rank. Could I show the pattern to someone as a green belt? Sure. Would I be have been able to teach it as effectively as an instructor should at my current level? No way. With respect, Sohan of course they arent able to perform the technique as good as a black belt. but they perform it well enuf to get passed white sash. so techniquely, if they teach a white sash they way they do it, they should also be able to get passed white sash. the point isnt will the yellow sash be able to teach as well as the instructor, the point is that someone with no experience will get something out of learning from someone with experience, regardless of how much experience it is. does ian thorpe teach me to swim? no. will i drown if thrown in the deep end? no. There are good points on both sides here. The main question is to the quality of instruction. Knowing what to teach, and how to teach it, are just as important as being able to perform the material. There is no substitute for a quality instructor. Of course, it is difficult to become a good, quality instructor if you never get the chance to teach. The important thing is to make sure that bad habits are not developed because of a lack of experience in teaching. You have to have the good foundation in order for the training to advance.

Good point, good point.

Kansas: uh, The Cosmosphere in Hutchinson. The Kansas Speedway (yea nascar!) There are a few more, I'll have to think of them. Oh, yeah, ME!! just kidding.

I don't block in sparring the same way I block when I do forms, but it is still blocking, even though you don't use the whole technique. The techniques are taught to build strength and coordination. When sparring and/or fighting, you have to change things up a bit. It is important to be able to alter the blocking motion to be faster, and not telegraphic. It all has to do with levels of learning. You learn the techniques first, and then you start to learn how to alter them for application. Take bunkai, for example. When you apply the katas to bunkai, some things change. The kata is great for teaching the techniques, and then bunkai comes along and teaches applications, which changes things a little bit.

I think that the quality of grappling found in karate schools will continue to increase with time, and with attempts to better themselves, much as Mr. Speakman has done here. I believe that he is very competent, and probably has a very good system that he is working into his curicullum. Keep in mind, it was just a demo, and he probably did not go into detail completely.

I don't think anyone looks bad in a gi. I have gotten to wear I feel quite comfortable in mine, like it is everyday wear. And I think gis accomodate women fairly well.

That hand and forearm armor looks good, do you think it could suffice for my weapons training, or should I look elsewhere?

On the surface, they seem somewhat similar, however, Systema stresses relaxation and more "flow" whereas, KM seems to be more "explosive" for lack of a better term. Ah, I see. Thanks for differentiating them for me.

Great, thanks.

There are sword styles that block with the back of the blade, there are styles that block with the flat of the blade, and there are styles that parry with the edge of the blade. Also, what was referred to as 'voiding' in western styles was popular as well. Voiding was getting the body out of the way of the strike. Then a counter strike could be made.

Just a side note: We have a testing this week Thursday. Just yesterday at class, the instructor was letting some of the kids know that they may have to wait another cycle, because they don't look ready.

If you could give the name of the technique in English, I could help you figure something out.

quote alsey: a 'block' just keeps you on the defensive and does nothing to improve your position. When I block in sparring, I find myself able to move inside the technique as I am blocking, thus improving my position. Therefore, I feel that blocking is beneficial and can improve position if done correctly.

Training with both old and new can be beneficial to your own training. Also, trying to find a way to finish out your training and getting to become an instructor may be a goal that you could work towards.

Looks like a good deal to me.

Name: Brian Walker Height: 5'7" Weight: 245 lbs. Style: TKD 13+ years Titles: 1st place forms, American Invitational 1st place forms, AKTA Tournament Favorite technique: Spin hook or spin heel kick.

I think it would be fun to shootbox, but I would think that at that price you would have the option for more than 2 classes per week. That would be my only sticking point.

The websites can only give you a general feeling for what the schools offer. You should go check out each school and see what the classes are like; for example, what level of fitness they offer. Also, try to figure out what the instructors' philosophies are. Check out their teaching methods, testing cycles, and things like that. It won't be a good school if there aren't good instructors. One more thing, just because a school may focus on competition, doesn't make it a bad school. Schools like this will usually provide a high level of fitness, and fitness is always beneficial. The kenpo site looks very self-defense oriented, and may be a lot of fun. Good luck on your journey!

I agree that the level of training for any martial art should be high. I don't believe it has to be at a professional level of training, but it should be high. Every class I attend makes me tired. I am always huffing and puffing, and wondering if I am going to make it through. Part of this comes from working hard, and part of it comes from the fact that I am not really a great athlete. I am not a runner, and I never have been. And I wouldn't require my students to run long distances, but would encourage it. Also, I do feel that many schools don't spend enough time on self-defense. Sure, time is spent on forms and one-steps, but self-defense training is different.

I like to practice a lot of basic stuff on my own. I also like to practice old material, like low rank forms and self-defense techniques. This is your chance to practice whatever you want, however you want, and not worry about being tied to the format of a class. So, have fun while working out on your own!

My style does a lot of linear movement, but when we do joint manipulations and self-defense techniques, we get more circular things going on. I feel that the cirucular maneovers help to get around the rigid, strong people who try to resist when you are linear vs. linear.

Ah, very sneaky. I thought it was a true story! But very well written, and very practical.

That looks like some very interesting stuff. I would love to see my style incorporate more ground work and joint locks.