Zaine

Escrima is something that I always have found fascinating but haven't tried out. It's cool that you branched out into something that you're unfamiliar with! It's always a great experience to do something that you are unfamiliar with and keep on doing it so that you can grow!

I agree. There is a story I like to tell when people say (about cooking) that cook a certain way because their Mother did, as did her Mother and so forth. It is common to hear that you should cut the tip of a beef roast because "it enhances the flavor." (At least it was common where I was raised). This was because it "enhanced the flavor." However, if you trace back the myth, eventually someone will tell you that they did it so that it would fit in the pan. Martial arts is similar, I think, in the sense that there are things that we do because of tradition but the actual reason was something completely practical to the situation of its creator and has since lost it's usefulness (because we now have bigger pans).

says bushido_man96This comes from another thread, but has sparked my answer to this thread. Because I feel the above quote is wrong, because there is no link between the two. Yes, similar concepts at work etc, but no direct link. And to me to be a tradition requires that direct link. A link beyond word of mouth, but a link of teacher to pupil, a direct transmission. To me this is the definition of traditional within the martial arts. I think that you miss the point of what he was saying though. He was not claiming that they are linked by either tradition or direct transmission, but in conception. I think that saying MMA is the spiritual successor of Pankration is a perfectly valid (and true) statement. Are they linked? No, probably not in most cases. Does that matter? I don't think so. Furthermore, I don't believe that he was claiming any link through tradition, although I think that MMA does follow in the tradition of Pankration. The way we use tradition in the context of this thread may operate under a different understanding but in the sense that it is a tradition for cultures (especially in the west, it would seem) to have a gladiatorial event (i.e. Pankration, jousting tournaments etc.). With this in mind, I would argue that MMA does, in fact, follow in the tradition of Pankration, despite the fact that MMA is not a direct descendant of Pankration per se.

You have great drive! Keep to it and you will go far!

Congrats!

I teach it from the start. If a student learns a kata, I think that they should know exactly what each move is for. This way it is not only easier to commit to memory but they can use those techniques more effectively should they every need to.

I have not seen it! Thanks for sharing! It was pretty cool to watch.

I agree. I would also guess that it started somewhere in Africa or the Middle East. Possibly it started in Mesopotamia. Possibly somewhere far away and much earlier that we have discovered yet. This whole topic would be a very interesting paper (if you have to do one) for a black belt test requirement.

I wouldn't think that it would be much better. Ask yourself this, however. If you are ever confronted with a situation in which you would have to defend yourself, would it be better for you to use techniques that are painful for you and therefore maybe weaker because of it, or would you be better off using techniques that work for your body. Most martial arts aren't made for every body type and instructors know this. That is why we push our students to understand the technique that our respective systems teach while at the same time stressing that if something works for you, it works for you. If it doesn't, then it doesn't and there is nothing wrong with this. If you enjoy your school, then stick with it and modify the techniques to fit your body.

Welcome to KF!

Awesome! Congrats! My school started out in black gis for whatever reason. I guess it's just what my instructor preferred. When we got to black belt we were allowed to wear blue pants.

That's true! The funny thing is that as time moved on the long sword started to get made more for thrusts as well due to the nature of the armor worn by the opposing side. So while it was still great for slashing, it became more and more apt at killing with the point as well. http://www.worksofrichardmarsden.com/historyofthelongsword.htm If you have the time, this is a cool article. There is a pictured timeline that illustrates the evolution.

Awesome! The soreness will go away and come back when you start new things. Soreness is just part of the journey, eventually you will use all of those muscles on a regular basis and it will be much easier! Keep it up and have fun!

I've never run one but I've been to one. They're definitely possible through insurance (or at least that's what the organization running it said) you just have to do some research, maybe talk to some lawyers to get the necessary paperwork. I remember having a lot of fun, it was only a weekend but there was a lot of seminars, morning work outs, they provided meals (none of them were that great at cooking but what lacked in flavor was made up for in the community that you ate with).

Do this. It's good that you've made an appointment. Too many Martial Artists that I've known have ignored injuries such as this and ended up making it MUCH worse that it was ever going to be.

A few! Overlooked that question. http://www.youtube.com/user/scrimatore For the Schola Saint George you can find them here.

Definitely. It takes a lot of body control to pull these off.

That would be cool. The obstacle to that is finding which part to make safer and which rules to impose or restrict from the regular UFC.

Nope! Judo injury to his right knee took care of that when he was much younger. He actually has a funny story about his kickboxing days as to why they don't call him "Superfeet." While fighting in the ring he once kicked with his right foot and it made contact, which gave him a 100% success rate for that foot, so he decided not to ever use that foot again so that he could maintain that accomplishment. In all actuality he doesn't, as a general rule, because of the Judo injury but the story was a fun way to mystify the people at the seminar.

Awesome graph! It's really interesting to see how it all breaks down. Thanks for posting!

To quote a wise jedi master:

Good luck to you hammer.

First of all, welcome to the forum! With regard to your question, I'm afraid it's a little to vague to give you a more specific answer than the ones you've already been given. Proper training over time will develop the technique, speed, power, and composure under pressure necessary to defend yourself. Hopefully. I will be honest with you--there is no martial art that can guarantee you will overcome a larger attacker 100% of the time. The best they can do is give you a much better chance than you would have without martial arts training. Agreed. Although I cannot give you an answer from a feminine perspective, I can relate my experience fighting larger people. My sensei was both taller and larger than any of his students and because of this we spent time learning techniques to use against a bigger opponent. So there are a plethora of techniques that allow you to effectively defeat a larger opponent but, like Wastelander has said, there is no guarantee. Just as there is no guarantee that a larger opponent will defeat a smaller one.

Good luck to you!

sh Nunchaku are an advanced weapon for my school that is learned right before Shodan. The children class never touches anything other than a bo. So I also cringe at that.