Spartacus Maximus

An interesting question, this is. I think that it is an essential duty for an instructor. A sensei who is meets and greets his student personally shows that he is approachable and that is one of the main qualities of any kind of teacher. In fact, I cannot recall a single dojo I have trained in or visited where the sensei AND sempai did not greet each student or visitor or did not make time for discussion either before or after training. Some sensei even go above and beyond. I wonder how many CI go out for drinks with their students(any of them, not just black belts) or have supper together after training every weekend. Each time someone shows up early, sensei is always there training and offers a cup of extra strong coffe or tea and biscuits. The most interesting discussions I have had were in these times before and after practise. Even visitors get the same greetings and sometimes join us.

I am a traditional karateka, so I will be drawn to look at hands for any sign of regular and sustained impact. Even if there are no obvious marks such as hardened callouses, it tends to show if someone regularly strikes something with their hands. Besides that, MAist usually have a keener awareness and manner of moving that is different from regular people.

The very idea of instant instructor qualification with no previous training reeks of a scam. Considering how long it takes to become proficient at something and have the minimum depth of understanding to actually teach, this is ridiculous. What if it were not martial arts? Let's say something like this: Instant qualification in Medical Science. No experience or degree required! Only one short accelerated course with guaranteed certification! Would you trust some guy who took that course and called himself Doctor? Hardly anybody would be fooled by an offer like that. So why is it not as blatantly obvious when it comes to instructor qualification in martial arts? I cringe just picturing the abysmal quality of so-call instructors produced by these types of course. They may as well just give out certification to any buffoon who can make poor imitations of Bruce lee yelps while waving their arms around like an epileptic having a fit. Whoever thought of this scam and actually gets people to pay is surely having flatulent fits of belly laughs all the way to the bank

How a person practises their martial art is determined by experience but also by the level of mastery. Personality also has an important role. Everyone learns by first imitating their teacher. Only after the foundation and basic principles are mastered, a practitioner begins to personalize the system. For karate this usually happens after a decade of practise or between 4 and 6th dan. Teaching is different from practise or application. To teach a system means that the teacher makes a conscious effort to transmit that system's fundamental principles, basic techniques and exercises exactly as he was taught. If any radical changes are made or parts left out, it can no longer be called the same system. As long as you teach the core of X-ryu, you are teaching X-ryu.

That is exactly my point. The tackle is an offense tactic made for football wich is a sport and has nothing to do with martial arts. It works in football because it was made for football. It is similar to the shooting technique used in cage sport fighting but it is not the same thing. Cage fighting also has certain rules that determine and limit possible countering techniques. I just gave examples from what I was taught and shown by my teacher(s) and from my experience as the unofficial punching bag that I was throughout my school years. As for every counter, timing and optimum range are the most important factor of success. Notice how many times I mention these in my examples of counters. I would be interested in Sensei8's ideas on possible counters.

A football charge or tackle is probably the easiest attack to see coming and counter or just avoid. Unless it done from behind and by surprise. The simplest counter is a well timed kick to the head or face as soon as the attacker lowers his head to charge and come into kicking range. A head grab and knee into the face or solar plexus is also good if done as soon as he is within range. With a frontal charge/tackle it is also possible to side step and use the momentum of the attacker to trip/throw directing him into the nearest hard object such as a wall. Very painful and requires very little effort besides timing and that is easy to get with practise. Even grade school kids do this to each other. Besides that, a headlong charge or tackle as done in football(aimed usually at the lower body waist/legs) is really not an intelligent fighting technique. Once started it is nearly impossible to stop midway to change moves or even see what the target will do because the head is down and tucked in.

Maybe my thoughts on this are somewhat bias because I am not a kyokushin karateka. Or perhaps the karate I am learning is too different. Although I admire the kind of physical endurance necessary to accomplish such a feat, I do not see any interest or point to it. Standard sparring bouts are usually less than 3 minutes and are stopped after one scores a certain number of hits or knocks the opponent down/out. Street( is there a better word) situations are usually over within a few seconds. Where or how the 100 man kumite would be relevant, I have no idea. I would be more interested in an exercise to test things like: Threat awareness, timing of techniques, striking focus/correct power generation etc. You don't have to spar a hundred men non-stop to see how much endurance you have.

Rank only has meaning within a dojo or an association. It is just meant to be a teaching tool that was developed to teach large groups of students. Ranks are markers to remind the teacher of each person's approximate level of knowledge based on established standards and material. Even within the same dojo, not all shodan ranked students will have exactly the same skill level and understanding. What they will have in common is a general understanding of their system, its basic techniques and main concepts. Just like highschool graduates: all of them earned their diploma, but not all have the same grasp of the required credit subjects Outside of this context, only actual skill level matter and that is not something that can be easily shown by a given rank. I had a 3rd dan in my ryuha before I re-started the same style under a different sensei. I knew and could perform all the kata in my system as well as having a basic grasp of applications. None of it mattered! My previous rank was not even considered and just like everyone else I had to start all over. Only one person in my dojo had no previous rank and training. A year and a few months have since passed and I don't even think about what rank I used to have or which I have reached. Only my teacher tells me what skills I gained so far. My skills are different from others and so are my weak points. I do not know or concern myself with what the other 2nd kyu students can or cannot do well. Focussing on personal advancement and efforts is more important than considering rank. Also, the proliferation of self-appointed pompous sounding ranks should be something to keep in mind. It perfectly illustrates how subjective the notion of rank really is.

The only way to teach and be student is to get your teacher's approval and permission to teach what you have learned. Obviously it is necessary to have reached a certain level of proficiency before considering this. If you do get your teacher's approval, take it a step further and make sure to get him involved in your teaching. Ask for his input on how to teach or explain key concepts. Consult him whenever you have to answer questions from your own students. Organize training sessions with your group and his. If you can do any of those, everyone will benefit and your teacher will appreciate your efforts to pass on what he is teaching you.

I do not care much for the term 'warrior' and I am nearly certain that the use of this word in the context of martial arts arose from the difficulty of translating and interpreting cultural concepts in them. Warriors are not the same as soldiers. The soldier is a professional who fight for an established power and it's ideals. A warrior is an ordinary man who takes up arms to face a direct threat to his social group. Only the most basic human social organizations still have warriors nowadays. Anyways, I think that what is meant by 'warrior spirit' is a strong sense of mental toughness and moral justice combined with strict self-discipline and determination. Martial arts training encourages and develops these qualities through concentrated efforts over time. These qualities are more applicable to everyday life than any type of physical conflict context.

If you think something is too tough or too difficult for you before starting, then it is too tough. Such a self defeating mindset will make you fail without ever having tried. Karate training was never meant to be easy. The question is wether or not you are determined to take the first step. Outer toughness is impossible without first having inner toughness. In martial arts, the mind and body must always work together. The two follow one another and depend on each other, but the mind must lead. Mental toughness and determination to persevere through difficulty, or pain or initial failures will make you strong but the lack of it will make you quit. Make up your mind and follow it. Others can give you suggestions, advice and even encouragement but the will and decision are yours alone. If you have neither it will not matter how much others push you.

The general public is comfortable with familiar labels for foreign things and concepts. It is in our nature to categorize things that share similarities in order to make easy references and explain them to more people. Not too long ago, even the term martial arts did not exist or at least not with the meaning understood today. Judo was probably the first Eastern martial art/sport to be introduced to the West. So for a long time, everything was referred to as Judo. Karate was next and for decades that was what people called "martial arts that use hands and feet". Karate became a familiar term to ordinary people, so taekwondo was sold as "karate" or "Korean karate". This is the result of commercializing martial arts and has been going on ever since the first dude who figured he could earn a living by teaching. If you want to sell a foreign concept, people will need to have an idea of what it means before becoming interested. Circa 1920-1950 Judo/jiu jitsu=Eastern martial arts 1955-1970 Karate=Eastern Martial arts 1970-1990's Karate=kungfu=eastern martial arts Mid 90's-now Martial arts=exotic and deadly fighting methods from East Asia This sounds very basic and is indeed a very crude and shallow generalization, but it is exactly what the public thinks. The only people who have a more accurate reference than this are this who are interested and involved in martial arts.

I read some very interesting answers from the posts on this forum and it all makes sense. I decided to discuss it with my sensei and his answer was not something I ever thought about. He said that I thought too much about doing things correctly and that thinking too much interferes with actually performing techniques. The unconscious breath stopping is because of confusion from thinking about and trying to move in a way that is still not familiar, and awkward. The solution to my problem is also very simple: keep training and stop thinking. I'm still not sure I understand completely but I don't intend to stop practising anytime soon.

It is difficult to explain precisely what I mean because I don't know how to describe it well. I try to make conscious efforts to generate power with the lower core area but it is hard to breathe out completely. It always feels like I am holding some of my breath during the instant I squeeze my core. I have no control over this happening and it becomes very demanding when doing kata where some parts must remain tensed while the core is tensed only for an instant to strike. I am a shorin ryu karateka so the best example would be naihanchin kata. The legs are supposed to stay tensed and dynamic contractions of the lower core are supposed to be used to execute the many short hand techniques explosive and powerful. I will so venture to guess that Goju ryu and Uechi-ryu have similar principles in the kata Sanchin.

I have been struggling with what seems to be a very common problem when trying to generate power. It is even more obvious with strikes which are meant to be short and compact. I have heard and seen countless times that power is generated from the lower abdominal area just below the navel. Whenever I try this, I feel like I am moving slower. The main problem is breathing at the same time because whenever I try to contract for the instant of a strike, I have a reflex to hold my breath. I KNOW I am doing something wrong but I am very frustrated and puzzled on what it is and how to fix it. What I do is definitely not what my teacher can do. I just don't get it! I understand how he does it, but I still don't know how I can do it myself. I would appreciate any ideas on how to improve this, especially the breathing problem because I'm certain I'm not alone.

I will give a logical answer and say that ring experience should only be relevant to those who hope to learn how to prevail in that context. In other words, only people who are interested in competition would make ring experience a deciding factor for choosing an instructor or training place. I chose my instructor because what he teaches is Okinawan karate as it was originally intended: effective defense against violence using the body as a weapon. He has never competed I any ring as far as I know, and often repeats that he has never practised or taught for competition as the goal. The most important deciding factor was his ability to explain so others can understand and apply his knowledge. Without an ability to pass on techniques accurately and effectively, all the experience in the world would be wasted. There are many champion competitors and people fight well using a given system, but how many are also good at getting others to become skilled as they are?

I need to have every day planned for the week. I train for up to an hour and a half every day except dojo day. The first part of each day is the same and on each day I choose one kata to practise in depth with its oyo bunkai. I also review the points for the weeks dojo day. Things that my teacher explained or corrected for me. So my home training looks like this: Stretch Front, side and roundhouse kicks both sides Kihon kata 1-5 3 times each One kata 10 times, focus on correct form Oyo bunkai for same kata.

If you make the decision to go back to the old system with only black and white or if you want to get rid of belts altogether; it will probably take time for people to accept and get used to the idea. One sensei I know has interesting ways to get his students to change the way they think about belts and skill. His first idea is to set up a week or a month where everyone including sensei wears a white belt. Another is to have training done in just Gi bottoms and a white t-shirt. After the student get accustomed to that, the start to focus more on their skills and eventually belt colour loses its meaning.

When I trained in my childhood and youth I had mostly Century, an American brand from what is probably the largest martial arts supply company in the Americas. Now I swear by Shureido and refuse to wear anything else. My belts and gi are from that store as is every other piece of equipment I own. My gear bag, my DVDs, books and even some clothing are Shureido. The reason is that my sensei is from Okinawa and the store staff are friendly acquaintances of mine. I like to support the local economy and give business to them. I also recommend them to all because they are always very friendly and helpful.

The most difficult thing legitimate martial arts teachers have to deal with is commercial schools and the consumer mentality. The popular idea of a dojo comes from how commercial schools (McDojo) present themselves . The consumer mentality is material-based. People expect a material reward for everything they achieve, no matter how minor. Progress and advancement must be tangible for most people to understand. They assimilate their achievement to the belt and come to see it as a goal. They also want and need something to show. Then, gaining the next belt becomes more important than actually grasping new skills. Taking a long time to reach the next belt feels like being held back a grade in school and feels like failure. This is because it is very difficult to accept that gaining skill takes a long time. Mastery takes even longer. Without a belt, they think they are not progressing because they have nothing to show. Nowadays it is nearly impossible to teach without belt. If you tried to teach without belts and made sure each student actually took the time necessary for them to gain skill, you would be left with very few indeed. The majority is too soft, too impatient to understand that it takes time. My dojo only has 3 belts before shodan and I remained a white belt for nearly eight months before I was told that I had advanced and would be judged for it on that same day. That would never work in most dojo out there, most do in fact get bored or discouraged if they are not tested or promoted after just a month or two training twice a week. You just cannot expect the average martial arts student to shut up and practise for months until you see enough improvement to reach the next level. The idea that skill progress in martial arts is personal and requires sustained effort over a long time is very difficult for people who are used to and expect instant results after a certain time.[/b]

My favourite sayings are these two: "Fight yourself" "the mind follows the body and the body follows the mind"

I wonder why in these cases, nearly 9 times out of 10 it is much easier to reason with the child/youth than with the parent. I like to call it soccer-mom syndrome. It applies to basically all sports and martial arts where parents start to believe their child is more special than the others. These parents are usually over- enthusiastic and have a very superficial, yet distorted familiarity with martial arts. This combined with an overblown sense of entitlement makes them think that they know better than a teacher with decades of practise and teaching. I place the blame on the commercial schools and strip-mall dojos. These types of schools is what most parents are familiar with and they usually expect belts/ promotions after a certain time put in. This is why it is necessary to explain clearly from the beginning that advancement is personal and testing is between teacher and student.

I understand your point of view and I do not see anything that I could disagree with. I would like however to elaborate what I said. In my opinion, reasons for a change are much more important than the change itself or how long ago it was made and by whom. My point is that a change should make sense from an effectiveness and technical point of view. Learning to identify and explain changes is very important for personal training and even more important for anyone who wants to teach others. It helps understanding how and why something works and how it should be applied for maximum effect. A change should be made for practical reasons or physical reasons. If it works for the intended purpose, than there a no reason to dismiss it. The rest is a matter of adapting it to one's unique characteristics.

If I think back to when I was a youth, I remember that the most effective way is to make everything into a game. It has to be fun, exiting and a little bit competitive. Children have very short attention spans and cannot understand on the same level as teens or adults. Most of the time they just want to play into their fantasy and emulate their heroes (TV, movies, stories etc). Trying to teach them anything other than the most basic and gross motor skills is a waste of time in most cases. It is also impossible to judge their ability the same way teens or adults are judged. This requires at least a general familiarity with children's physical development stages. Everything should be broken down to the simplest parts. Kata for example, should be taught no more than two or three moves/steps at a time. The bulk of the training time should focus heavily (80%) on stances and transitions and punch, kick, block. It may sound boring but it is up to the sensei to be creative enough to come up with several games or activities to practise the same small number of techniques. How many exciting ways of practising/drilling punches could you think of? Also the teaching curriculum should be only a part of the regular one. If, for example the regular curriculum has 15 kata plus bunkai; the kids should be limited to basics(kick, punch, block) plus the two or three first kata. That is more than enough for kids.

I think you have made the right decision getting rid of these people. It is unfortunate for the young student but there was no other solution in my opinion. If you had ceded to the man's unreasonable demands, you would have set a precedent and set yourself up for more trouble from them and others. This is a clear example of the consumer entitlement and selfish attitude that plagues the martial arts. The man showed showed a complete ingnorance of the meaning if training, effort an practise. He was also very childish in the way he reacted to your perfectly clear explanation. Obviously he was not willing or able to accept it impossible to reason with. Demanding to test is very arrogant and presumptuous. If a student asks to test they are definately not ready. Someone who demands to test has already failed because they have no understanding of the purpose of training. Maybe a good idea would be to have a regular chat with your current students about testing. Not having a regular testing time is very good because regular testing reinforces the idea that everyone will be tested at the same time. If students are expected to train without knowing when they are tested, they learn that advancement in skill is personal and different for each individual.