btroadman Posted August 14, 2003 Posted August 14, 2003 In a discussion recently with a few Martial Art instructors a topic arose about how the more flexible you are the less power your kicks will have. Has anyone else heard of this? Any extra thoughts on the subject? BJJ - Blue BeltTaeKwonDo - Brown BeltKrav MagaKickboxing
monkeygirl Posted August 14, 2003 Posted August 14, 2003 If you are naturally flexible, it's generally because you don't have a lot of muscle to constrict movement. With proper training though, you should be able to have the best of both worlds: flexibility and strength. I'll move this to the Health, Training and Fitness forum, where people more educated on these matters than myself can help you 1st dan & Asst. Instructor TKD 2000-2003No matter the tune...if you can rock it, rock it hard.
btroadman Posted August 14, 2003 Author Posted August 14, 2003 I was actually curious to know what fellow TKD members had to say on the subject, that's why I put it in that category. BJJ - Blue BeltTaeKwonDo - Brown BeltKrav MagaKickboxing
NyteShades Posted August 14, 2003 Posted August 14, 2003 I honestly think you need to have both, but it has to be balanced. It does you no good to throw a roundhouse to the temple if there is no power. Yet it's not going to be all that great to throw the same kick with all the power in the world if the only place you can hit is in the arm or leg. I think that anyone who is working on their flexibility should also work on weight training. If you stretch out the muscles to much then you are compromising the strength of the joints. Nyteshades
karatekid1975 Posted August 14, 2003 Posted August 14, 2003 I have good flexibility and I have pretty good power. So yea, you can have both. Laurie F
iolair Posted August 14, 2003 Posted August 14, 2003 I think there's some evidence that static stretching (where you hold the stretch for so many seconds) reduces power in your kicks for a time afterwards (maybe a couple hours I think). But in the long term, more flexible muscles allow your limbs to move faster, and that means more power. Currently: Kickboxing and variants.Previously: Karate (Seido, Shotokan, Seidokan), Ju Jitsu, Judo, Aikido, Fencing.
Looneyas Posted August 15, 2003 Posted August 15, 2003 I think there's some evidence that static stretching (where you hold the stretch for so many seconds) reduces power in your kicks for a time afterwards (maybe a couple hours I think). But in the long term, more flexible muscles allow your limbs to move faster, and that means more power.I have power in my Flexibility, There is a difference, Only way to get powerful kicks is not in flexibility but in kicking and kicking and more kicking. Learn and u shall TeachTeach and you shall learn,https://www.southpacifictkd.com.au
BladeLee Posted August 16, 2003 Posted August 16, 2003 It definitly does not reduce power. When you stretch a muscle, your agonist and antagonist muscles will create less friction, which means more speed. Ultimately, more speed will equal more power. ~BladeLee~
Red J Posted August 16, 2003 Posted August 16, 2003 Think of it like this. If you think that flexiblity loses power then you are assuming that lack of flexibility increases power. Not true. You can be flexible and still have power. I think where you might have a point may be where you throw a really high kick requiring more flexibility as opposed to a range that requires less flexiblity. Generally kicks that require greater flexibility, like in the 5-6 foot range, are harder to master and generate power than say a kick belt level. I had to lose my mind to come to my senses.
IAMA_chick Posted August 17, 2003 Posted August 17, 2003 yeah, i think people can definately have both even if the flexibility isn't natural. i am flexible and also have power. Tae Kwon Do15-years oldpurple--belt
Recommended Posts