bushido_man96

Try to be more offensive with your techniques. Offense can sometimes pass for aggression, so this may be what he wants you to do. Also, when you attack, make sure to attack with earnest. Commit to your attacks, and even if you are going to get countered on, still try to hit them. It doesn't mean that you have to be mean to anybody, just more determined in your sparring. Try to transfer it to your forms and basics as well.

Ah, thanks for the info, Steve_K. That sheds some light on it!

All righty, this week the Chiefs play the Broncos in Denver. I probably don't need to tell anyone how big a game this is for KC this week, being against a huge arch rival. I won't delve into my true feelings about the Broncos, because I like being a member of this site! Well, this is always a tough game, and it will be even tougher without the starting QB. Green is out of the hospital, but will likely miss the next two weeks. Week 3 is the bye week for the Chiefs, so he gets 3 weeks off. The Chiefs also intend to sign Rod Gardner this week, pending passing a physical. He should be a good addition, helping out the receiving corp as most likely a number 3 guy, bumping Dante Hall to the number 4 spot. And now, my key to winning in Denver:............feed Larry Johnson the ball!!!!!!!! He needs 25 to 30 carries, and about 200 yards of offense to keep the Denver O off the field. Hopefully, Jake Plummer will contribute to the Chiefs as much as he did last week to the other team, making the defense look good! Could be wishful thinking, but I am clinging on for a win in Denver!

TriangleMan makes a good point. Wrestlers are used to working for a pin, so they will probably either consciously or subconsciously be trying to work you towards your back for a pin. At the same time, they will probably view going to their back as an attempt to be pinned, and try to fight it extra hard. However, it will probably be only a matter of time before they break out of this habit, and realize that it is ok to be on your back.

All the talk about the ego and such that makes instructors want to control where one trains makes me glad that MMA have come along to show the benefits of being able to apply the strengths of various styles to make up for the lack of other styles. It makes me wish there was an MMA school to train in around my area.

I agree with you. I kind of feel the same way about those who use running a certain distance as well.

I remember No Retreat, No Surrender! Ivan was his character's name! Wow.

First of all, you should check out a school yourself. You can do all the reading about the style, but the instructor is what you need to know about. Finding out their credentials is a good start. Watching a class is of upmost importance, so that you will know what kind of teacher the instructor is, and what you are getting into. Free intro classes are a good sign. I won't say that black belt children is a bad sign, but watching their technique and how they act is a good idea.

I believe that Funakoshi is probably the person most responsible for interjecting the moral and ethic values into the study of martial arts. In the title of his book Karate-do: My way of Life, the title states that it is his way of life. Others may view it differently. Now, another question is can you view martial arts like other athletic activities? Take football, for instance. It can be used to build physical skills, like the martial arts can, and it teaches things like teamwork. However, there are some terrible people out there that are great football players. I think the same could be said for the martial arts as well. Boxing and wrestling don't teach moral and ethical values as part of their core curriculum. However, we still consider them martial arts. Are they now not martial arts, because we realize this? I am not saying that I think the martial arts should not teach morals and ethics. I think we should do these things, because it is the right thing to do. I will teach them. However, I don't believe that these things should begin with the martial arts.......it is the job of parents to lay down the morals and ethics that we are to grow up with. Now, that being said, it is true that in there purest forms, the martial arts, as they apply to war, were used to defend the practitioner's country in times of war. Saying that they were used to defend what they felt was right for the people of their country, then would lend to the ideas behind what we all learn today in the arts.

Do you think of a backfist as a thrusting technique, or a snapping/swinging technique? I think it snaps more than thrusts, but that is just my interpretation.

Oh, come now, I don't live here! Do I? You think?

That is good advise, but you may want to spend some time in one art to get a good base foundation, and then move on. Welcome to the forums, BTS!

Kind of like a punching bag you can wrestle with.

Yeah. It is like, when you are getting ready to work out, and you want to improve your speed. You tell yourself that you are fast. You punch fast, you step fast, you kick fast, etc. Loren Christensen talks about it in some of his books, and it helps to reinforce postives as opposed to focusing on things you can't do well.

Even Bruce Lee was a little arrogant, and some would have said he was cocky. However, his contributions to the MA world are well known. Most of us would probably say that he is a martial artist as well.

Like the scene in Hard Target with Van Damme, where he kicks the guy off the bike. Ouch!!

When we were taught the back stance, we were taught to make an L with our feet, and then the front foot goes 3 feet lengths forward, and then bend the knees. For the cat stance, we were taught it was half of the back stance length, or 1 1/2 feet lenght, and up on the toes of the front foot.

Even in point sparring, I think it could be beneficial to allow clinches and lightly applied knee strikes, just so students can get the idea of how it feels to apply them, and what its like to see them coming in.

true, though i think the greek systems were sport oriented somewhat like modern MMA. it just seems to me that a lot of kata using arts were designed for non-sporting, non-battlefield situations. there are exceptions of course. True, they were sport, but people got killed doing it. And as it is with UFC today, they probably tried to do it quickly, and with the most efficient moves available. Sometimes they even fought with gloves with spikes on them!

Do you think this is the case for most TKD schools? My instructor is this way as well. The only way I was able to take up Combat Hapkido is because he got his 1st dan in it. If he wouldn't have been teaching it, I would not have had a chance to learn it.

My dad studied Moo Duk Kwan TKD many years ago. He said the forms I do now are the ones he used to do. He also did the old palgwe forms, too. His style was a little more open in sparring, allowing sweeps and groin shots, as well as hands to the head.

I think that the only time you will see a fight start from a stance is in competitions. Most of the time, it is a fairly natural fighting stance, nothing really fancy.

"Will you teach me how to sweep?"

How hard a punch is also has to include what you expect a punch to do. Like a jab--it won't usually knock someone out. A cross can. Or is the prerequisite for a punch just to contact an object with a closed fist? From what postition does the punch have to be initiated? Does it start from the rib, or from an advanced arm base? Does have to travel 12 inches, or just 2? There are just too many variables.