bushido_man96

I actually did not even set it up, he came flying at me with a crazy "push kick" and I knew that I had the longer reach with my legs, so I caught him alot better than he caught me. It sounds like you picked a good spot, then. You did get him in the head with it?

Some think Long Fist, others Mantis, but the reason there is a confusion is because it depends on what Kung Fu the korean learned! Sip Pal Ki translates to 18 techniques or something like that.... Kind of like Kumdo being the Korean version of Kendo?

Welcome to KF!

Welcome to the Forums!

However, a history lesson is not important when it comes to defending your life against a killer. Doing something historic for the sake of preservation is a good thing. You can see this in many different activities, like Civil War re-enactors. However, you wouldn't take a musket to war today. I enjoy practicing forms. I won't say that I don't. But just because something is "traditional" doesn't mean it is right or effective. There was a time before the use of forms, that forms did not exist.

Ah, ok. That is simple enough. Thanks, John.

Hopefully the instructor realizes this, and doesn't make a habit out of it. Otherwise, he is not helping the situation any. I like your attitude toward your rank, by the way!

It's Korean Kung Fu. Could you elaborate further? I have know nothing of the nuances of the style, nor have I ever heard of it.

Or modern Tae Kyon is influenced by popular TKD? umm...no....TKD roots come from Taekkyun... Yes but under the Japanese occupation Tae Kyon nearly died out. It was never a systemised martial art to start with anyway and it is almost certain that it was never recorded down because it was considered a game that the lower classes played. As part of an effort to revive the art it is possible that some more modern techniques received influence from TKD as people tried to make Tae Kyon more like Tae Kyon (if that makes sense). And TKD roots aren't exclusively from Tae Kyon, during the Japanese occupation many Koreans learnt styles of karate or Chinese systems (when exiled). The amalgamation that became TKD has more roots in Japanese or Chinese arts than it does in Tae Kyon. This is particularly evident in the way most of the forms are performed and the fact that some schools actually use Karate forms. I am in accord with DWx here. I can remember reading some articles in Dragon Times that was an historic appraisal of TKD, and much was discussed in the way it came from Karate-trained backgrounds, and is not actually a thousands years old system. This is the same issue I have with the claims of Tae Kyon. When Korea finally escaped the occupation of Japan, they were so willing to have something their own, that they would propogate a style as being a thousands years tradition, when in fact, it was not. General Choi even mentions something to this effect in his TKD Encyclopedia. The only weaponless combat method mentioned in the Muye Dobo Tongji is Kwon Bup.

I agree. Well said.

I don't wear anything under my uniform, and I never have a problem with rashes. Do you have more of an issue with rashes, from the nature of practice of BJJ? Perhaps due to more contact?

I don't think that the Gracies were trying to earn respect that way. I think that they just wanted to prove a point with their system, and they did that. In the process, their attitude that they would play in anyone's house ended up earning respect for them. They didn't say "respect me," they said "fight us, then say and do what you will." Welcome to the Forums!

In this case, I would not necessarily respect them, if I didn't feel that they deserve it, no matter their rank. However, because of the "necessities" that the practice of Eastern Martial Arts usually dictates that you bow to higher ranks, then I would most likely do so, but only if I absolutely had to. Even then, however, it would not be out of respect. If I am at a tournament or some large gathering, with lots of black belts, I don't spend a lot of time just bowing at every high rank that I see or that walks by me. Agree. Basically my sentiments above.

Thanks, all.

Well done!

This name is new to me. I had not heard of it before. See what you can find out about it for us. That would be cool.

This may be more due to that practitioner's skill level, in comparison to the amount of time that you have been training, and the level that you train for (if he is an MMA fighter, he is probably getting a considerable amount more training). So, don't get discouraged.

I didn't think that Tai Chi was a type of Kung Fu, really. On the other hand, doesn't Wushu mean "Martial Arts?"

Haha! Me or any submission grappler would be licking our lips at seeing lapels that big - aloha collar chokes! You vultures, you!!!

I agree. When I bow, I don't even really think of it as respectful; just more like a handshake. One thing that I can't stand is when someone expects you to bow, and if you don't, they get all red-faced, and then want to attempt to make you bow, somehow.

I got the official word at class tonight: I passed!

I agree that he didn't want to compete. However, this kind of competition may have been more geared to Lee's ideals. But, that is neither here nor there, and we are left with what he has said: most likely not.

Well, some are ambidexterous, and can use both equally well. As far as the dominant side is concerned, I think you can train yourself to not be so reliant on a dominant side. It just takes time. The younger that you do this, the better, and the easier it is as an adult.

Personally, no. But if you watch the movie Budo: The Art of Killing (1978) it shows a guy split an apple core the long way with a spearhand strike Cool. I have never heard of that movie before. I broke one of those really flimsy 1/4 inch thick boards with a spear hand once. It felt cool, but it really wasn't anything to be impressed with. It would probably look cool in a demo, though.