bushido_man96

8-31-08 From Tae Kwon Do, The Ultimate.... again: Rising kick (stretching kick): 10 each leg. Front kick: front stance, advancing. 10 each leg. Outside crossing kick (crescent kick): 10 each leg. Inside crossing kick (crescent kick): 10 each leg. Jumping front kick: back stance, advancing. 10 each leg. Hook kick: from fighting stance, front leg. 10 each leg. Spinning back kick (with step forward): fighting stance, advancing. 10 each leg. Spinning hook kick: fighting stance. 10 each leg. I was focusing on not over-rotating on the spin back kick, and on getting good base foot rotation for the spin hook kicks.

8-29-08 At the park again, working solo, using Tae Kwon Do, The Ultimate Reference Guide to the World's Most Popular Martial Art as a reference point again: Straight punching: sitting stance. 10 each arm. Side punching: from sitting stance. 10 each side. Jab: fighting stance. 10 each side. Reverse punch (cross): fighting stance. 10 each side. Double punch (jab/cross combo): fighting stance. 10 combos from each side. Knife hand strike (upset): front stance, advancing. 10 each side. Spear hand strike: front stance, advancing. 10 each side. Side kick: I used the method discussed/demonstrated in the Side Kick thread here. Stepping together and kicking from a fighting stance. 10 each side. This has always been a tough kick for me, and it was tough today. Made my hips sore, too. Round kick: back leg, advancing. 10 each leg.[/url]

It reminds me a lot of Capoeira, with the rhythm and music, and the kicking styles.

I agree. I have been fortunate enough to participate in schools that don't use seiza or any meditation practices. We do have an Aikido club at our college, but they do about an hour's worth of breathing and the like of sitting in seiza prior to their workouts. This just doesn't interest me, so I haven't gone to check it out yet.

I have seen the ads for that book. I have the 4 original, and have considered purchasing this one as well.

This will just depend more on time and availability. If you have one style that has classes 3 times per week, you could fill in the other 2 days or more with another style, and you don't lose any time with either. If you have that kind of time, anyway.

I agree with you here, Bushido-Ruach. I feel that since many sport styles evolved from a more combat based style, then it is a simple matter of extrapolation to make it more self-defense oriented.

Looking at the way that the above posts address the ridgehand, it appear that if you are close enough to hit with the forearm as well as the hand, stepping in behind and utilizing the power from the arc, along with a reap, will provide very nice results.... I think this is what I meant...thanks! Should have looked through previous posts first I guess...

I think this as well. I am not saying that it isn't a long road to hoe, but it can be done. As with anything, though, it is easier to seek those that have gone before you, and learn from them.

I was introduced to the jumping front kick the same way that you were, joesteph. However, adding the step would be a simple addition. One of the difficulties I have seen early on it training this kick is that most people are more coordinated on one side than the other, and getting that leg-switching motion down is the hard part. After that, the kick seems to fall into place. When I was in the ATA, I was introduced to this kick at the 3rd belt (yellow). At the 4th belt (camo), we learned further variations of this kick. At purple belt (6th rank) we were introduced to the jump outside crescent kick and the jump round kick. At the next rank (blue belt, 3rd gup) we learned jump spin outer crescent, jump reverse inside crescent, and at the next rank (brown) we added the jump side kick. These were pretty much rank required skills, but depending on each student's skill level, they could be taught earlier, and more advanced kicking could be learned as well. Back to the jumping front kick, in the style of TKD I do now, this kick is taugh as part of the basics for each class. However, other jumping kicks are not covered as soon or as often. None of the forms have a jumping kick until Choong Moo, which has a flying side kick. As for other black belt forms, in my research I have noticed that some of ours have been modified so that the jumping kicks are done either as hopping forward kicks, or more like skipping (in Gae Baek hyung, for example, on the flying side kick, and the jumping round kick is just a back leg round kick). I like to teach every student some basic jumping kicks, just so that they get exposed to them. Not all students are created equal, though, so I try to work each with what I can, and let them make the decisions from there. I do enjoy jumping kicks, as they are fun and challenging to do. They help build leg strength and conditioning (there are lots of good jump kick drills out there to build explosive power), increase skill, and enhance proprioception. As for me, I am 30 now, and still do some jumping kicks. Kicks like the 540 degree jump spinning variety are a bit out of my league, but some of the more simple jumping and spinning kicks, I don't have much trouble with.

It is fairly commonplace anymore. I have a contract signed with my school. However, I am relatively certain that I won't be quitting any time soon, so it isn't any big deal to me. What it really is, is a contractual agreement to pay so much per month for classes for a specified period of time. The money gets to my instructor via EFT, and the longer I sign up for, then the less I pay per month. Also, I don't have to worry about cutting him a check every month, either. For me, it is more convenient to do it this way. Many students are opposed to the idea. However, if you find that it is something that you plan to do for a while, it really isn't much of an inconvenience. I am also relatively comfortable with my instructor to the point that if something did come up, I could get out of the contract fairly easily.

Congrats!!

He has a lot of 'em. Aside from forming his Jeet Kune Do, he was a philosophy major. I don't agree with all of his ideas, but they are definitely worth exploring.

Perhaps if you leave, but opt to keep your child in, they might cut you some slack. If they have any business tack at all, they should let you out. It doesn't always work that way, though. Ask and see. I hope it works out for you.

We have two one-steps where we knock down the attacker's punch and then follow with a side stepping ridge hand strike, like a clothes line attack.

Yeah, you can do cleans and snatches with the dumbbells as well, and they are supposed to be more beneficial to MA movements. Also, you can get a physio ball, and really hit the stabilizers there too.

Blah!

In this scenario, I will reference the MMA fighters and practitioners out there. They are able to allocate their training time to include the various aspects of the fight game; standing, clinch, and ground. Sure, there are some with their specialties, but it is apparent that none of them could compete successfully if they didn't have the knowledge of all three. Therefore, I think it is important to consider the training methods that are entailed to help make one a more complete fighter.

I agree. I think that it is important to your techniques with concepts in mind. In the end, it is the applications of concepts that will help you to win out, over mere technique, I feel.

I am not saying that I don't agree with you. Just pointing out that one of the great masters thought otherwise...

Well, there was that scene in The Best of the Best where the Korean did the ridge hand break on those slabs of concrete, downwards. Pretty nasty, but, it was a movie.... As for the use of the ridgehand strike, I just don't think it is that useful. In some of our forms, we use it as a blocking technique, and from here, the application of grabbing could come into play. I have seen guys do board breaks with a ridge hand strike, but I feel that it is too easy to hyperextend the elbow when doing a strike like that. I would stick with the knife hand myself.

Dangerous, how? In what ways do you mean? Just curious. I think tori is saying it because the untrained fighter would be unpredictable?? I think... I was wondering if that was his thought or not. Very well could be. That is all good information to keep in mind. Very good point, and a very viable idea in response to my question to Tori. I think you might be right. I deal with guys like these on a daily basis (thankfully, they are usually behind the bars). I know of several of them that really feel as though they have nothing to lose, and wouldn't think twice about trying to drop someone when they are not looking. We always have to be aware. By the way, the term "haymaker" is still used. At least, I still use it.

This phrase floats around a lot in MA discussion, especially when it might come to cross-training, or training for events that might demand such action, like MMA competition, or RBSD. So, my question to the members of KarateForums.com, is how much does this really concern you? Do you worry about having too much on your plate, or that you won't be able to excell in one style because you take time for 2? Personally, I feel that the phrase is bunk. When you get to the root of the matter, that Martial Arts primary goal is to allow you one to effectively defend oneself, then it is imperative that one be able to handle oneself in any situation that could arise in combat, be it standing, clinching, or grappling. In the end, I think it has more to do with effective time management and training programs. What does the community think?

That's a pretty cool setup, tallgeese. It sounds like you have a lot of autonomy in your school. It really fosters the student to truly find their own way.

Honey is a lot of sugar as well, isn't it? Its natural sugar, but I think you can still get too much of it.