bushido_man96

OK, along the same lines of the Is MMA a strategy? thread, do you feel that RBSD is a strategy, or a style all its own?

Now, with this part of the discussion cooling down, what does everyone think about being able to implement elements of MMA into the core curriculum of their style? Is it about upping the level of protective equipment? Or introducing some ground fighting ideas (if you know some...)? Is it something that could be implemented into a traditional curriculum with some success?

I would think that these targets could be used, but as opportunistic strikes to targets like the eyes, or the throat, or other soft targets. The leapard paw, if I am not mistaken, is much akin to the palm strike, so it would have more readily available uses, like the power slap, right? However, I do think that strikes like the palm heel strike into the jaw, or punches to the jaw or body would likely take precedence, and I say this depending on where on the use of force ladder one is at the time.

Thanks for the tip, John. I have noticed that the motion in bringing the uke down in the shio-nage is most troubling to me. I think that part of it might come from my start-and-stop approach to putting the technique together right now, though. As for the books, I have most of them, and have either read them or am in the process of reading them. I am looking into acquiring a few more, too.

I think that this is where the confusion lies. There is a difference between learning effective self-defense, and mastering a Martial Arts style. The latter should take a lifetime; the former should not. Acquiring good, solid self-defense skills, from any MA, should not take years to acquire. It should come in the first 6 months of training, I think, at least. Now, I am not talking about being able to enter a ring and win an MMA match, or being a Master. I am talking about being able to either keep yourself out of a fight, being able to do enough to survive and live another day.

Likewise, I would probably struggle with the more circular blocks that you mention. But, with time, one can adjust, and perhaps take the best of both worlds. At any rate, what is important in my mind is if you can take what you know, and make it work efficiently for you. That is the essence, I think.

I have also found this to be true. Falling and rolling seems to focus a lot on the core. I do appreciate it. Yeah, seiza pretty much sucks. I can't sit in it for too long, and it is nice that our dojo isn't too strict on it when doing the demonstrations. I'm getting better, but I don't care for it.

I agree that having some information on exactly what you are talking about would be most helpful. But, as tallgeese stated, just bringing it up in a "what do you think of this" kind of way will do two things; 1) get it out in the open, and 2) get the instructor thinking about different approaches. And it won't make you look like a know-it-all.

Congrats to you, Patrick, for putting together such a constructive place for all of us to spend some time.

:lol: That's great!

That's pretty cool. I wonder how hard it is to take apart?

My TKD school had a testing tonight, and there were 4 white belts that tested. One of them was so nervous that she almost couldn't contain herself. It reminded me of what it was like when I first tested as a white belt. I used to get really nervous, and still do, but not to the extent that I used to. I would get pretty wound up, the butterflies would kill me, and I wouldn't eat before hand (and for me, that's saying something! ). So, I was wondering how many here remember their first testing, and how nervous they were at the time? Do you still get really nervous?

I agree here as well. Arcing attacks like the hook and uppercut punches would apply as well. These are good shots to throw in close, and they should not be discounted.

I have never taught it, and have only experienced it a few times. I really enjoy the stuff that we do from Hock's system when we get to it. I don't remember much about PPCT, but I do remember this technique, the dead-leg round kick to the common peroneal, and the front pushing kick to the bladder, along with the way that the hands were held out in front. Could you give me more specifics on what you don't like about it? 11-20-08 TKD testing: 6:30 - 7:30. No workout or demo today. Led the floor for the testing.

That must be pretty nice to be able to go to class 5 days a week. I get 2 at my TKD school, and one Aikido, if I'm having a good week. With the Hapkido session, I might get 4 training sessions in a week.

My concern here lies in these statements. You state that you can play basketball at a high level, and not have these problems. If this is the case, then I don't understand why warming up at a high level would be any different. It seems inconsistent. Perhaps you should take about 15 to 20 minutes of your own time before class to do a light warm-up, prior to going into class. That may help.

It was "Your thoughts?" that tipped me off first.

I agree. I think that saying that if one claims that MMA is more of a strategy than a style, then I think you can say that about most styles in general. Each style tends to have something about it that defines it, which is why there end up being so many different ones. What works for one doesn't necessarily work for another, so variations come about.

You got your hands full there, eh ? It really isn't too bad. I do one Combat Hapkido class on Monday mornings right now, I got to TKD 2 days a week, and I attend Aikido on Saturday mornings, if nothing else is going on.

With the holidays coming around, you could offer some holiday special to potential customers.

I like this one!

Welcome, John. Don't I know you?

Looks good. Its nice to see another DC movie, as well.

Very cool. Really creative.

I would like to see it, but I don't know that I'll make it a priority. Maybe when it hits DVD.