bushido_man96

And another problem with the hierarchy is that if it has been around for a long time, and no one in the organization knows any other way, there can become some mad panic to fill in the voids, in which some bad decisions can be made. I think what needs to be evaluated is 1: what the position is there for, and 2: can the organization get along without that position.

Wow. I'd like to hear how that continues to play out.

I caught that on Baseball Tonight. Very cute.

I don't imagine that in an altercation that the neck is going to be that easy to manipulate. If someone grabs your head, I imagine that most of us would tighten our neck muscles, especially if we feel that the head is beginning to be manipulated. So, I don't know how practical that would be.

...unless you can take a chunk of skin off with the bite...

9-16-09 Taught class tonight. Didn't really focus on any one thing in particular tonight, but instead worked on covering all of the basics and one-steps. At the end of class, I encouraged the students to use the one-steps as templates to jump to different aspects and variations of self-defense.

9-16-09 Taught TKD class tonight from 6:00 - 7:00.

That's a viable concern, Bob. In can depend on the kick. For higher kicks, the pivot foot is vastly important. The more you can pivot that foot, the more you can open the hips, allowing for more power. But, for lower kicks, like to the upper leg or even the knee, the complete 180 degree pivot isn't as necessary. Of course, if you like to get that full pivot when you kick low, have at it. But, from what I've worked with, it isn't as necessary, and by not doing a full pivot, you can get the kick there faster. Also, the full pivot isn't are required for adequate power when kicking lower. The higher the kick, though, the more important the proper pivot becomes.

Then the headposts that remain, and the board, should begin deliberating on this matter, and decide what the best course of action would be.

That's adorable.

I like both, as well. The nice thing about a testing day is that it presents the idea of a goal to be reached, with a time frame to put to it; be it months, days, or years away. It allows for objectives to be set in order to work towards the goal, which will in the end (should) improve the day-to-day performance, which is evaluated for the purposes of allowing a student to test. I read a thesis once on how the testing is representative of a rite of passage, in a way. I like this idea, and I think that it is what makes the testing what it is.

To me, it's when you shouldn't have to. There have been times that I could have avoided a fight by leaving, running, or giving them what they want (once something as simple as a seat in a park). I am a very slight man (about 5'6" and 125lb.), and each one took that as an opportunity to control me by force or threats. That is wrong; I am not required to yield to anyone who happens to have greater biceps. I will fight with fist, foot, tooth, and nail for what is right, and I am no less justified by the fact that I could have avoided causing or receiving injury. To bow to these brutes would be a worse consequence than my swollen lip or my oppressor's broken nose. Edmund Parker said it well: "Should it be a matter of life or death, of right or wrong, then here are my weapons . . . " I can see where you are coming from here, and I can't say that I have never felt that way before, either. Being bullied isn't fun, nor should it be tolerated. There are times when discretion is the better part of valor, and there are times when action, or inaction to respond to rude requests, is the way to go, as well.

To discuss a move like a neck break without discussing the legal ramifications of using such a technique is not a good idea, in my opinion. If one is to even consider jumping to a technique like that, the other person better have a weapon or something in hand.

I agree about the practice, but using the methods that test your moves is going to be very beneficial practice. The DT sessions that I have had have been great for this. Also, doing research, and then working off the data, is a good approach to take, as well.

I agree. Get it checked out.

It was enjoyable, and the sensei is so smooth, watching him and then going out and just butchering it like I do, really gives me hope that I can attain that level of control at some point.

Agreed. Each tourney is a learning experience. Thanks for sharing it with us.

I think this is a very good point. Ueshiba comes to mind with his philosophies of Aikido. Norse, I believe. They dine in the halls of Valhalla, and then go out to fight and die in the fields of Asgard, and then, arise, and return to dine, and then do it all over again.

That's great. I'm glad that there are schools out there like that. I never said that "child prodigy" is an excuse. What I am saying is that not every child has the same talent level, nor are all children capable of the same things. Nor do I think that all children should be awarded black belts, either. However, I do think that those shown in the threads here are exceptional students, and not every child is going to be achieving that level of skill that early. I think that they can get closer to it, but some children will take longer to get there than others.

I've been there, as well. Especially with Combat Hapkido, we try to make sure that we finish more and more on the ground. But, its all give and take, too; my partner knows that I get a turn after he does.

Ok, semiar is over, and I am a bit sore, but I made it through, and had a pretty good time. Day 1: The sensei talked a little bit about conflict resolution, and how it tends to meld into Aikido's overall philosophy. Then, we spent time on working various techniques and how the philosophy went along, like letting them go where they want by leading them, and then using their energy, etc, as opposed to fighting against their strengths. We did a "corner drop" and nikkyo and kote-gashi techniques from wrist and cross-wrist grabs. Afterwards, we did some bear hug defenses, as it was requested by one of the attendees. Day 2: In the first session, we started off with some basic tai-sabaki exercises, moving in four ways: inside and to the head, inside and to the wrist, outside and to the head, and outside to the wrist. After practicing these, the sensei then had us work on a different defense using each of the different tai-sabaki. This was nice, because it showed that it didn't matter which way you defended, because there is always an option. The second sesion of day 2 started out with about 20 minutes of meditation, which I really didn't care for, but I think most of the partcipants here on the forums are aware of my thoughts on meditation. My thought was I could have spent 20 minutes on more technique work, but, that's ok. After the meditation session, we got to do paired jo-staff work. Now this was fun! We learned 4 different jo "segments" as that attacker, and the defender. I really enjoyed this session; I'd say it was my favorite. Weapon on weapon work is always fun for me. Day 3: Sensei asked if anyone had anything in particular they wanted to work on, so when no one spoke up, I offered up Shio-nage, or 4-direction throw. In the books I had been reading, Shio-nage was held as one of the important aspects of Aikido, and learning Shio-nage helped in learning others, as well, so I thought, why not? We did several variations, with a same side and a cross side grab being done nearly the same, which was nice. At the end, he showed us a 2 on 1 Shio-nage, which we got to play with. Then, we finished with Shio-nage free practice. After each of the sessions, I spent time at home writing in my notebook, and cross-referencing my Aikido books to mark pages that showed the technique we did, or something very similar, so that I could have a reference point to practice it from. Some I found, and some I didn't. I know I won't retain all of the techniques that we learned, but what I have come out with are a better idea of some of the general principles involved with all of the techniques of Aikido...things like unbendable arm, extension of energy, and moving from the center, and keeping the elbows in. It was a fun seminar, and I look forward to next year's seminar, as well.

Yeah, I don't know exactly what happened there, either. Injuries, perhaps, but I dunno. 9-13-09 Chiefs 24, Ravens 38 This game stayed a lot closer than I expected it to, which made me happy. However, it appears that we may not have a running game again this season, even with a healthy and leaner Larry Johnson. There were no openings for any of the backs to run through, and the line isn't good enough to be trying any stretch plays. The defense showed some signs of improvement. The 3-4 will get better as the players get more comfortable with the system. I thought Hali playing more of a linebacker spot is good for his speed, and Derrick Johnson looked good, too. But, when the Ravens did run the ball, they ran it well, so run defense may be a problem, too. Croyle played decently, and though he won't start if Cassell is healthy, I don't feel bad about him backing up. But still, it could be a long season if this is what is to be expected.

That's pretty cool. I thought the Lego Karate guys were cool, too, but they should have had their hands up when kicking. Love that Lego stuff. Its also cool how the rectangular-ness of the Legos lends itself to the similarities in the graphics of the 8-bit NES.

I used to collect football cards a lot, but like many other of my hobbies, it started to get expensive, and so have laid off for quite some time. Still have 'em all, though.

Welcome back.