bushido_man96

To me, and I'm not wanting to sound like the biggot here, because I don't think of myself as a biggot, but depending on what the alternate lifestyle is, it might make a difference to me. If I found out the instructor was smoking dope, it would probably affect whether or not I attend that school. It would also affect if I sent my kids to the school; other things might come into play, as well. The same sex relationship thing, would just depend to me. If the instructor was trying to use the MA class to push their beliefs on the students, then I would probably consider not going there. If they did not do anything other than teach MAs, then I would probably not let it bother me. It would just depend on the situation. I think its easy to say "to each their own," but I do have my core beliefs, morals and ethics, of what I believe is right or wrong, and if someone tried to push some different beliefs on my family in that respect, then I would take that into consideration in regards to attending or not.

When I am striking, I'm usually thinking of penentrating with the strike. I do like the idea of the push on joint manipulations; I had never thought of it that way before, but that makes good sense. But when I strike, I'm not usually looking to just push someone away, but at times, it can be useful.

I think it tends to get easy to forget to thank someone, when you do something every day or every few days that just tends to be the normal grind for us. I know I just tend to take it for granted. Great post, Bob.

Congrats!

I don't doubt that at all.

8/1/2012 Kwonkicker Footwork tutorial #1: switch, front step, back step, and bounce, doing incremental sliding forward and backward, then the steps forward and backward. 15 minutes of footwork training. J/C Leg Cranks: 1 circuit, 1 minute rest between exercises. Squats: 24 Lunges: 12 each leg Split jumps: 12 each leg Squat jumps: 12 Stretch I think my legs are not going to like that at all. But it felt so good to do something with a focus.

Robert Charette just released a very nice book on Fiore Dei Liberi's manuscript Flos Duelletorum. If you purchase Tom Leoni's translation of the Getty Manuscript, and use Charette's book as study guide you'll have an excellent combination. Even if swords aren't your thing, Fiore's simple, logical and efficient grappling and dagger defense (plus variants on how to apply the defenses using every day objects like batons and belts) is worth taking a look at. His entire grappling system is broken down into 4 basic positions, and the rest of his fighting system extrapolates from these four positions. The great thing about Dei Liberi is that his system is a complete, integrated and internally self consistant system of fighting with weapons that is laid out in a logical and reasonably clear manner. Leoni's translation: http://www.lulu.com/shop/tom-leoni/fiore-de-liberis-fior-di-battaglia/paperback/product-5364635.html Charrette's Book http://www.freelanceacademypress.com/armizare.aspx Very cool. I will check into these. Thank you!

Its quite difficult to say, to be honest. I don't know enough about the Koryu arts to make a solid judgement. I do study an eastern sword art, buts its Haedong Gumdo, which was invented in the 80's and is a synthesis of japanese styles, Gicheon il su kung fu and theatrical sword fighting so its not entirely relevant. If you look at the grappling, its very similar. The dagger work is similar too. All The techniques tend to emphasize very direct gross motor actions. There isn't anything like the japanese notion of Aiki and not much emphasis on pressure points or small joint manipulation, just a fist to the face and a dagger in the neck. Western swordwork has some very unique features which are made possible by the shape of the weapon which I haven't seen in Japanese swordsmanship , but as to whether they are more or less practical I do not know. There were philosophical, even internal aspects to some of the arts, but these aspects do not resemble the philosophical aspects of eastern arts at all. The biggest issues we face are context. We see these pictures, we read the words but we are not entirely sure what it is we are seeing, especially with sword. The grappling and dagger are fairly easy, since we have a modern basis of comparison. Initially there was great resistance to applying and using Kenjutsu and other living lineages, but that resistance is dying and with more eastern sword arts people coming in we may gain perspectives to fill in the gaps. In these manuscripts the language is sometimes cryptic. The art may be crude or missing. The context is uncertain. One of the problems is that these manuscripts were usually written as reference books for people who already knew how to fight. There is much that the authors assumed the reader would already know, so they didn't write it down. Trying to figure these things out takes alot of time, study and trial and error. Disputes over interpretations have caused heated arguments and even schisms in important organisations. Another problems is the distinct possibility of frauds..how many of these manuscripts were written by guys who knew what they were talking about, and how many were written by frauds? Koryu arts don't need to worry about this..they have a living lineage, a teacher and full syllabus with a defined interpretation of the art There are strong points though..we can see elements of context that I think may be lost in oral transmissions. We have the literal words of the fighting men themselves telling us what to do, what works and when. For instance there are certain dagger defense techniques and sword guard positions that work much better in armour than out of armour and the authors tell you this. Similar techniques may have been preserved in Koryu, but without the words of the old masters, their original intent may be lost. There is also an element of mutation that is bound to occur in any oral transmission. Any art that is not being used in its original function will mutate to suit its new function. Since no form of transmission is perfect, I suspect that there has been mutation in certain elements of Koryu that no one may realise. If I could throw in a line or two here, they won't be as in depth as Zoodle's response, but I'll give a whirl... In response to the bold type, I would admit that the WMA practitioners started out behind the 8-ball because of the lack of a continual transmission. As technology changed, the WMAists seemed more apt to adjust with the times, moving on to firearms and the like, and relying less on cold steel. If you look at the history of Boxing and Fencing, you see how they went from more combat related arts to sporting arts for the gentlemen to compete in. As sword play wasn't needed, its instructors went away. So, the WMA practitioners must use more of a trial and error form of learning to figure out what is being referenced in the manuals, and by doing some active research, through sparring, they begin to piece back together these old styles. Its a long road to hoe, but very rewarding in the end. I think many see this as not being a very accurate way of learning what the old masters taught, but when you think about weapons fighting of the time, the armor that was worn, the make of the weapons, and what is described in the manuals, and using common sense in combative movements, it can be a very fun and enlightening way to learn those styles.

You may think so now, but when you train with an instructor, I think you'll find that you hadn't taught yourself anything at all. yes. From experience, you will walk out of the very first class realizing that you learned more in the first thirty minutes than you did for the past year of self training - and a few weeks later you will discover that it will take you months just to train the bad habits from that period out so that you can start to be as good as the people who had never trained who just started in the class. The first half of what you say, I do agree with. The second half, I think comes down to the individual. Some people are pretty natural athletes, and can overcome physical miscues more easily than others.But, overall, I do agree that instruction as opposed to individual self-training is a better rout to follow.

I've seen the HEMA website, and it seems like lots of good stuff is going on there. I'm curious as to whether or not there have been any recent works published worth picking up? I have several translated Fectbuchs, but haven't picked up anything new for a few years. Thanks for joining up and sharing all this with us. I look forward to having more converstations with you on this subject. Its been a while since I've reviewed anything, and since I have no group around to study with, aside from some SCA guys I used to fight with, all I can really do is read and learn.

Welcome to KF! Have fun at your camp, and let us know how it goes!

1. It depends on the school. I'd guess between 2 and 4 years. 2. As long as you hit their designated target area, you should be fine. Most of the time, they use punches only in competition, and they aren't usually scored much, if at all. 3. It depends on what your goals are for the Martial Arts. If you don't have anything else going on, its as good a place as any to start. 4. Yes, you'll do lots of different hand strikes in the forms and in some one-steps, but in sparring, you'll mainly see punching.

That's awesome. That really shows how far ahead Norris was thinking.

I have several different works on Medieval Combat, and have enjoyed all of them so much. George Silver's works are fun to read, and many don't realize he was pretty much a contemporary of Musashi. Its good to see some more info on Western styles floating around now. Thanks for showing these here. Another great resource for WMA is the website https://www.thearma.org They have the works of their members listed there, along with ways of setting up practice groups, and scheduled seminars. I would love to be able to get to one of those someday.

I'm hoping to catch some of this, and the TKD.

Congrats to Rogan.

I'd like to think that Martial Artists fall under the sheepdog category, as do law enforcement officers (LEOs). Unfortunately, I don't think that is the case. There are some people out there doing MAs that don't have the capacity to commit violence if they need to. Unfortunately, there are also LEOs out there that are the same way. I watched a video at academy that we actually did some extra work on in which an LEO did not pull the trigger in a situation where it was obviously needed until it was too late. That said, I do think the right training can help some people see that they are sheepdogs. That said, I do think those three categories do cover the bases pretty well, and I'm not sure what other categories could be added in to simplify things more.

It definitely does depend on the instructor. I would still stay away from the Karate For Kids chain of TKD. I've heard nothing but horrible things from them. Each school is different. I ran an ATA school a while back, and we had a K4K program. It was a good program, and we worked on the physical stuff with learning the belt curriculum, and also worked on the "spiritual" side of things, in learning about honor, integrity, courage, self-control, and all that good stuff. It contains the kind of stuff kids want to learn in Martial Arts, and the kind of stuff parents want their kids to learn. The idea behind the Karate 4 Kids program is to present instructors with a format to teach the kids in both ways, and to keep them interested and coming back. The program itself is a good idea. Some instructors are not so good at it. In the end, it comes down to individual schools and instructors, and their approach to the programs.

Slow steady....I hope your recovery is complete this time around.

Believe it or not, this is a good thing, actually. Not every day will be a good day, and learning how to deal with these distractions, work through them, and re-focus, will be a good thing for you in the long run. As a matter of fact, if I were your instructor, and I noticed this out of you, I would probably try to present those circumstances in class more often. Bad days will get better. Its just another stepping stone, so take heart.

Buying suitable footwear is going to be more likey to fit that budget than buying something to cover the drive with. You might be able to find some scrap carpet somewhere that could cover it, but it might be ugly, with holes, and dirty; may not be much better than the concrete. Two options I see: 1. Footwear. You can find some decent priced, light weight MA footwear through just about any MA product guide. TKD shoes are particularly light weight, and you can form your foot in them, too. 2. Work out on the concrete. This will toughen your feet over time, although it may cut back your workout time until you've built the toughness on your feet to deal with pivoting and what not. Then there is the heat factor of the concrete you must take into account. I'd go with shoes, but that's just me.

Go ask. If that doesn't work, then you can probably work out some kind of civil arrangement to get them back.

tallgeese summed things up pretty well, I think. There are variations from state to state, but a little research will help to clear that up. Now, from what I've seen in my experiences in the jail, when cops roll up on a fight, the parties fighting get arrested, usually for something like disorderly conduct, or battery, depending on the damage done. If a bit of investigating can be done to figure out who started it, and why, then perhaps one party can be absolved at that time, with the instigator being arrested in stead. However, what is usually ended up with is one group pointing fingers at another group, with no clear answer. So parties get to sort out their differences in court. Now, this is what I've seen come out of basically bar brawls...drunk guys mouthing off and getting into a fight. I've also seen aggravated batteries in which there is usually a clear instigator, and that person is arrested, but the victim didn't have a chance to defend themselves, or couldn't. I haven't seen any instances in which someone defended their lives by injuring another severly, let alone taking another's life. I believe it can happen, but I haven't seen it yet. It would take some investigation and hopefully some good witnesses (which are hard to come by) to help an officer fill in the blanks to come to an informed decision based on the "totality of the circumstances."

It sounds like you've done yourself well, moving on when you felt you needed to, and it seems to have helped you along. Thanks for sharing this with us.

I've seen bits and pieces of the original animae movie, and then some of the series that followed, in which he never fought with the sharp side of his sword. Some of it was ok, but just not my cup of tea.