now thats a hard one. which art do u guys think is more combat effective?

Well, i'm prepared to take on any two Silat dudes in my front garden.

 

>>PS<<<

 

 

 

LOL - only kidding. I hear it's a great art.

Obviously, I've chosen Sialt.. having access to both... Though it's also worth nothing there i no one art which is "Silat".

silat, definately

hmm for me personally i find wing chun more effective. just goes to show that its not the art but the fighter.

just goes to show that its not the art but the fighter.

 

not again...

well it is wether you like it or not

well it is wether you like it or not

 

Style does matter..If it didint i could make my own stlye up today and it would be equally effective as any otehr stlye...thats rediculous.

 

ultimatly it comes down to the person but stlye does play a role.

Off cause style matter. Both, B-coz it also depence on how well the person have learned the style and how well that person use teckiques he has learn.

 

I off cause, have to say Wing Chun. Silat is called "Dance of dead", but isn't that more for the show than for good use. Don't hang me on this one, that is just what I had read about Silat. Personally I just know what I'll read about it so please correct me if I'm wrong.

you have a good taste strayder