Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted
now thats a hard one. which art do u guys think is more combat effective?

Be everything. Be nothing.

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Well, i'm prepared to take on any two Silat dudes in my front garden.

 

>>PS<<<

 

 

 

LOL - only kidding. I hear it's a great art.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Self-defense is only an illusion, a dark cloak beneath which lurks a razor-sharp dagger waiting to be plunged into the first unwary victim. Sifu Wong.

Posted
hmm for me personally i find wing chun more effective. just goes to show that its not the art but the fighter.

Be everything. Be nothing.

Posted

just goes to show that its not the art but the fighter.

 

not again...

Posted
well it is wether you like it or not

Be everything. Be nothing.

Posted
well it is wether you like it or not

 

Style does matter..If it didint i could make my own stlye up today and it would be equally effective as any otehr stlye...thats rediculous.

 

ultimatly it comes down to the person but stlye does play a role.

Posted

Off cause style matter. Both, B-coz it also depence on how well the person have learned the style and how well that person use teckiques he has learn.

 

I off cause, have to say Wing Chun. Silat is called "Dance of dead", but isn't that more for the show than for good use. Don't hang me on this one, that is just what I had read about Silat. Personally I just know what I'll read about it so please correct me if I'm wrong.

If the first lesson was a failure, then you know that skydiving isn't for you!

Posted
you have a good taste strayder :D

Be everything. Be nothing.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...