KorroddyDude Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 (edited) Shorin-ryu is probably the least consistent of styles when it comes to what is taught and, if I recall correctly, the reason is that there was no "curriculum" before modern karate that had a specified set of kata that everyone had to know to make a particular rank. You were simply assigned kata based certain attributes, such as body type, etc. And that's reflected on how the different branches of Shorin-ryu (headed by the students of Itosu) differ so much from one another. I'm not sure if Chosin Chibana knew or taught Seisan, but I know that Nakazato didn't teach it. But Chotoku Kyan DID. On another note, I'm not sure of Kyan taught Naihanchi Nidan and Sandan, but Shimabuku didn't. So there's another example. Shotokan's Hangetsu is unique in that you don't kick in every direction like you do in Shorin-ryu, but it's definitely closer to Shorin-ryu's version than the Goju-ryu and Shito-ryu versions. Edited October 9 by KorroddyDude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaine Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 Welcome to the forum, @KorroddyDude, it's great to have you! I'm not sure if Kyan taught Naihanchi Nidan and Sandan, either. However, I know that Eizo Shimabuku, one of his students, did teach it. Eizo Shimabuku might have learned them from Motobu, who he trained with as well. Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KorroddyDude Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Zaine said: Welcome to the forum, @KorroddyDude, it's great to have you! I'm not sure if Kyan taught Naihanchi Nidan and Sandan, either. However, I know that Eizo Shimabuku, one of his students, did teach it. Eizo Shimabuku might have learned them from Motobu, who he trained with as well. That would be Eizo Shimabukuro. Different person from Tatsuo Shimabuku. Edited October 9 by KorroddyDude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wastelander Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 1 hour ago, KorroddyDude said: Shorin-ryu is probably the least consistent of styles when it comes to what is taught and, if I recall correctly, the reason is that there was no "curriculum" before modern karate that had a specified set of kata that everyone had to know to make a particular rank. You were simply assigned kata based certain attributes, such as body type, etc. And that's reflected on how the different branches of Shorin-ryu (headed by the students of Itosu) differ so much from one another. I'm not sure if Chosin Chibana knew or taught Seisan, but I know that Nakazato didn't teach it. But Chotoku Kyan DID. On another note, I'm not sure of Kyan taught Naihanchi Nidan and Sandan, but Shimabuku didn't. So there's another example. Shotokan's Hangetsu is unique in that you don't kick in every direction like you do in Shorin-ryu, but it's definitely closer to Shorin-ryu's version than the Goju-ryu and Shito-ryu versions. I would clarify that a big reason for the discrepancies in kata curriculum in Shorin-Ryu is because Shorin-Ryu is a fairly generic name chosen to honor the Shaolin Temple, and the branches of Shorin-Ryu don't all share the same lineage. Of the 4 main branches of Shorin-Ryu, only one of them was a senior student of Itosu, and that's Chibana Chosin, who founded the Kobayashi branch. Kyan Chotoku, who founded Shobayashi, trained primarily with Matsumura Sokon and Matsumora Kosaku. Nagamine Shoshin, who founded Matsubayashi, trained primarily with Kyan and Motobu, which does put him in Itosu's lineage, but I wouldn't say he was a student of Itosu. Hohan Soken, who founded Matsumura Seito, supposedly trained with "Nabi" Matsumura, and then picked up some material from Chibana after the moved back to Okinawa, which also ties him to Itosu, but not directly. They all have some crossover with each other, but they all also trained with several other people, besides their primary instructors, so there is no singular line of Shorin-Ryu that can be traced back to a source, whereas all Goju-Ryu comes from Miyagi Chojun, and all Uechi-Ryu comes from Uechi Kanbun. Kishimoto-Di | 2014-Present | Sensei: Ulf KarlssonShorin-Ryu/Shinkoten Karate | 2010-Present: Yondan, Renshi | Sensei: Richard Poage (RIP), Jeff Allred (RIP)Shuri-Ryu | 2006-2010: Sankyu | Sensei: Joey Johnston, Joe Walker (RIP)Judo | 2007-2010: Gokyu | Sensei: Joe Walker (RIP), Ramon Rivera (RIP), Adrian RiveraIllinois Practical Karate | International Neoclassical Karate Kobudo Society Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaine Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 14 hours ago, KorroddyDude said: That would be Eizo Shimabukuro. Different person from Tatsuo Shimabuku. That is correct. He used the Shimabukuro/Shimabuku name interchangeably. Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nidan Melbourne Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 I know i commented on this a while back, but upon reflection I realise I forgot to add some content as I remember some things that my sensei (now Shihan) mentioned a few times whilst I was training. When the masters were about, they taught students based on what they thought would fit them suitably. Even if they were taught predominately the same kata, some minor variations may have been taught to suit the physical and/or psychological aspects of each individual student. So for Seisan, as relevant to this post; I learnt what I know as the "Dojo" Version which is what I am supposed to demonstrate at Gradings or any events where I am demonstrating a kata. But on the same hand, I have a "Tournament" Version which has some small differences to it along with a "Liam" Version which I made some minor adaptations to suit me and my physical needs when required. The "Liam" Version of katas, typically revolve an adjustment around stance height or changing it to a similar stance. So Seisan, if my joints are in no condition to go low then I sit higher in my stance. If I have to go in "Crane" Stance and I can't physically do it, I modify it to Neko Ashi Dachi ("Cat Foot Stance"). So when I teach, I mainly do the following: - Dojo Version (Required) - Tournament Version ("Shitei" Kata) - Student Variation - This is only done when I am working 1 on 1 and adapting it to their needs. But they need to understand and demonstrate the "Base" (our Dojo Version) and how the variation they learn still works or impacts how the application may work. However, 90% of the time, when I work with advanced students I get them to do the kata the way we ask then for them do it based of how they FEEL like it works naturally and effectively for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Maximus Posted October 10 Author Share Posted October 10 In the original post the question was about the style taught by Chibana and his students who eventually started their own schools. My teacher’s teacher(Miyahira) was one of these and so was the late master Nakazato(founded Shorinkan). It is now almost certain that Seisan taught in my school didn’t come from Chibana, otherwise everyone trained by him would include it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now