Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Legal problems due to belt rank?


Recommended Posts

This whole thread is very strange to me. Having to register yourself as a "Lethal Weapon" and giving a warning to an attacker of your training in Martial Arts sounds totally ridiculous!

If someone attacks me or my loved ones they will never know of my training, the only evidence they will have is that I could defend myself. There would be no time for conversation, the technique would land before they made their attack once I knew of their intent. In the UK, giving warnings and registering legally is a myth and a joke. We would laugh if someone expected this of us. For example, my Father was a bare knuckle boxer in his youth and a member of the British Special Forces; would he have to give three warnings to an attacker? No way! He would drop them with no further entertainment of protocol. And this matter of registering your skill with the police? I'm sorry, I thought it was a joke.

Great post...100% concur! :)

Remember the Tii!


In Life and Death, there is no tap-out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As has been pointed out, the whole "register your hands" bit is a myth. As for the larger point of whether you'll have a harder legal time, I certainly think that your training will be under scrutiny.

I am no lawyer, but I have always, in my mind, rehearsed running the heck away from the scene if I have laid someone out. If you aren't there, and witnesses can't give but a general account of the situation and your description then odds are better you wont be arrested and land in court.

And as for leaving the scene of a crime, it is easily justifiable that you were terrified for your life and didnt know how many friends that guy had just waiting to pound you into dirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out, the whole "register your hands" bit is a myth. As for the larger point of whether you'll have a harder legal time, I certainly think that your training will be under scrutiny.

I am no lawyer, but I have always, in my mind, rehearsed running the heck away from the scene if I have laid someone out. If you aren't there, and witnesses can't give but a general account of the situation and your description then odds are better you wont be arrested and land in court.

And as for leaving the scene of a crime, it is easily justifiable that you were terrified for your life and didnt know how many friends that guy had just waiting to pound you into dirt.

I agree that getting to safety is very important after an altercation. I'd even go as far as to making sure to call the incident in to law enforcement yourself, once you feel safe. Depending on where you live and how many people know you, fleeing without being identified might not be a viable option. By calling it in first, I think it makes you look better.

Its also important to know when to stop when it comes to defending yourself. There is a line that can be crossed from self-defense into battery, and you don't want to cross that line. A valuable tool instructors can give students is the experience of being able to explain your actions after they happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

There is definitely a line that you can easily cross when defending yourself.

More often than not that you can easily ease tension before any violence occurs. Otherwise if violence does occur i've noticed that you should do enough to stop the aggressor but not enough to full on injure them. But if they attack me say with a knife i'll defend myself equal to the damage that they could deliver to me.

I usually restrain and stop them in their tracks before they do more than they regret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to keep in mind is that if a case you are involved in goes to court, and the defense attorney finds out you have Martial Arts training (and any attorney worth his salt will find this out), then you can almost guarantee that the idea that you are "held to a higher standard" than the layperson in self-defense will come out. So be prepared to deal with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and you will have to prove that you took appropriate measures to try and prevent any escalation from words to violence (if they started talking prior to the violence).

If violence straight away that you didn't use excessive force to stop them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received my copy of The Little Black Book of Violence by Lawrence Kane and Kris Wilder today, and am on "Section One: Before Violence Occurs."

On p. 72, there's a story of how Wilder de-escalated a situation, so there was no fight. This was brought up by the authors:

Win or lose, if it came to physical blows, Wilder would have been in serious trouble.

 

If he beat the other guy down, the fact that Wilder was a black belt would undoubtedly have come out in court, dramatically increasing the odds that he would lose a criminal and/or civil trial.

Do you know someone with a black belt who had to use self-defense, and the belt was focused on in court? Perhaps something was made of it to his/her detriment?

Do you know someone who has/had a brown or (as in my art) red belt, viewed as someone approaching black, and it was brought out in court as above?

I see you're from New Jersey.

I am a law enforcement officer in Passaic County and I as of yet have not heard of martial arts training or rank being brought up in court, not at least in this state.

What you do see come up is a law enforcement officer's training especially when it comes to cases where the use of force is the focus of the case.

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and you will have to prove that you took appropriate measures to try and prevent any escalation from words to violence (if they started talking prior to the violence).

If violence straight away that you didn't use excessive force to stop them

A lot of gray and fine lines to be concerned with, and who's the final say as to what line is what? The court, and the court alone!!

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received my copy of The Little Black Book of Violence by Lawrence Kane and Kris Wilder today, and am on "Section One: Before Violence Occurs."

On p. 72, there's a story of how Wilder de-escalated a situation, so there was no fight. This was brought up by the authors:

Win or lose, if it came to physical blows, Wilder would have been in serious trouble.

 

If he beat the other guy down, the fact that Wilder was a black belt would undoubtedly have come out in court, dramatically increasing the odds that he would lose a criminal and/or civil trial.

Do you know someone with a black belt who had to use self-defense, and the belt was focused on in court? Perhaps something was made of it to his/her detriment?

Do you know someone who has/had a brown or (as in my art) red belt, viewed as someone approaching black, and it was brought out in court as above?

I see you're from New Jersey.

I am a law enforcement officer in Passaic County and I as of yet have not heard of martial arts training or rank being brought up in court, not at least in this state.

What you do see come up is a law enforcement officer's training especially when it comes to cases where the use of force is the focus of the case.

Solid post!!

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...