joesteph Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 In my high school psychology class, we were discussing the different chemicals that exist in the human body, one of them being human growth hormone, or HGH.There are males and females who are very short due to genetics. HGH will promote their growing taller. Only a couple of years ago, I learned of parents who wanted HGH for their son, in order to overcome his height-determined genetics.If a male is determined to be growing at a rate that will have him be less than 5'4", or a female to be less than 4'10", health insurance companies will pay for HGH injections that will cause at least those heights to be reached. The parents knew that their son was predicted to reach or just pass 5'4", so they opted to pay for HGH injections under a doctor's supervision.He started at about age thirteen, as far as I can recall, and took regular HGH injections (likely from a kit provided by the doctor), submitted to regular examinations, and stopped when he was eighteen. He reached 5'10" at an average cost of $18,000/year.I asked my students that if they were mothers (I teach in an all-girls academy) and had the money, would they do the same for a future son in the same position--that he would reach the minimum height. The great majority said yes. When I asked them if they would do this for a daughter, it flipped over to the great majority saying no.What do you think, either about the voting by the students or if you would/wouldn't have your growing child take HGH under a doctor's supervision? ~ JoeVee Arnis Jitsu/JuJitsu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The BB of C Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I say that tampering with nature stinks.No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonydee Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 That's a tough one: think you'd need to read the medical literature to form a balanced judgement re the health implications, but if the rationale is only that parents think their children will be less attractive / charismatic and have a consequently harder life, then I think that's pretty silly. The parents would be better off stimulating his or her social skills, rather than encouraging their child to think of themselves as having needed help....Cheers, Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Normally, I'd say no, as well. However, there are a lot of times when I do wish I was taller. At $18,000 a year, its a bit too steep for any budget I'll ever have. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Yasai Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 If I was him, I'd rather be short than pay $18,000 per year. Rational functions are a pain in the asymptote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger1962 Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 I say that tampering with nature stinks.No thanks.I agree - my sentiments exactly. "Never argue with an idiot because they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ Dilbert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_obvious Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Strictly from a height perspective, IMHO, probably not worth it. However, bringing GH up to nominal levels during adolescence could ultimately prove advantageous over a lifetime, as nearly every physical characteristic could develop more robustly.I have a close family member who had similar issues when they were younger (wasn't diagnosed until recently), and now in mid-life is suffering with some serious health problems. She's taking GH's, and doing better; but the lungs, heart, and numerous neurological functions will never be "normal." The Endo doc is of the opinion "if only, sooner..."....just my $0.02 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joesteph Posted October 18, 2009 Author Share Posted October 18, 2009 Strictly from a height perspective, IMHO, probably not worth it. However, bringing GH up to nominal levels during adolescence could ultimately prove advantageous over a lifetime, as nearly every physical characteristic could develop more robustly.I have a close family member . . .An important point to consider. We often think of a hormone as serving a single purpose, but nature has efficiently chosen to use it for several purposes. In the case of Human Growth Hormone, it's not just for height but for internal organs to develop well.Thanks for the posting. ~ JoeVee Arnis Jitsu/JuJitsu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei8 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 I've no idea/advise/help/comment because I'm not a doctor. So, if I say something and I'm wrong, well...I'm not a doctor. Sorry! **Proof is on the floor!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjanurse Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 My son took HGH for 3 years starting at the age of 14 to stimulate puberty-growing taller was only a "perk" of the treatment although he is only 5'8" now.It took an act of congress to get approved for a true medical reason...it riles me a bit to see parents getting it to give their kids an advantage in height. "A Black Belt is only the beginning."Heidi-A student of the artsTae Kwon Do,Shotokan,Ju Jitsu,Modern Arnishttp://the100info.tumblr.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now