Zorbasan Posted August 16, 2006 Posted August 16, 2006 i think an instructor should also teach a bit of history/theory of the art. its good to know a technique but it is better to know why a technique is done the way it is, and the different ways it can be used, some of which are not so obvious. Now you use head for something other than target.
Jiffy Posted August 16, 2006 Posted August 16, 2006 Very true.As you know, I love saying and proverbs, so here's another one.Good people know how. Great people know why. The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.
scottnshelly Posted August 21, 2006 Posted August 21, 2006 Scenario 1: The instructor teaches only techniques. The student learns about the other 99% of the fighting arts on his own after 30+ years of training.Scenario 2: The instructor teaches techniques and everything that he learned or picked up. Then the student knows everything that he's learned on his own, plus what his instructor learned, plus his instructor, etc.Which student would be better off? I think it would be hard for any one to argue that scenario 1 would be better. In the first scenario he's only learning on his own. In scenario 2 he still learns at the same rate on his own, but also learns what his instructors before him learned.
Jiffy Posted August 21, 2006 Posted August 21, 2006 That's a great way to put it! The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.
cathal Posted August 21, 2006 Posted August 21, 2006 Scenario 1: The instructor teaches only techniques. The student learns about the other 99% of the fighting arts on his own after 30+ years of training.Scenario 2: The instructor teaches techniques and everything that he learned or picked up. Then the student knows everything that he's learned on his own, plus what his instructor learned, plus his instructor, etc.Which student would be better off? I think it would be hard for any one to argue that scenario 1 would be better. In the first scenario he's only learning on his own. In scenario 2 he still learns at the same rate on his own, but also learns what his instructors before him learned.That's well put. I agree. .The best victory is when the opponent surrendersof its own accord before there are any actualhostilities...It is best to win without fighting.- Sun-tzu
ninjanurse Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 Agreed. Teaching is an art in itself. "A Black Belt is only the beginning."Heidi-A student of the artsTae Kwon Do,Shotokan,Ju Jitsu,Modern Arnishttp://the100info.tumblr.com/
jaymac Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 And the best way to learn is to teach. A great martial artist is one who is humble and respectful of others.
bushido_man96 Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 And the best way to learn is to teach.Very true. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
Brandon Fisher Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 And the best way to learn is to teach.I agree, this is where detail really starts to come out. Brandon FisherSeijitsu Shin Do
Shotokan-kez Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 I don't think there would be any point in teaching if the teacher isn't going to put in his all. I don't think a sensei would get very many students or respect if all he taught was the training regime and techniques. As someone else mentioned there is so much more to it than that. History and theory is important and we do get taught that in our dojo. Also he has to be there continually to help and guide the students and be shown where they are going wrong or right. Walk away and your always a winner. https://www.shikata-shotokan.co.uk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now