October 20, 200520 yr I don't think a fight with those settings/weapons would use much defense. I think both warriors would go for the first strike. I know from the history channel katanas were made extremely harder. If the swords met I THINK the broadswordwould shatter and the Samurai would win, otherwise both warriors would DIE. don't get mad, don't get even, get ahead
October 23, 200520 yr Author really? Katanas are harder? I really thought the broadsword was... The stronger swordsman does not always win.
October 24, 200520 yr The broadsword is ALOT hevier, but the Japanese knew how to fold the metal around and around to make a stronger blade. don't get mad, don't get even, get ahead
October 25, 200520 yr Author So does that mean that the Katanas are harder or more durable in a sense? The stronger swordsman does not always win.
October 25, 200520 yr harder.for durability, if you want to consider it the same as flexibility, I think that falls into the catagory of fencing coils, tai chi swords, or any other swords that are flexible. Some katanas are made flexible (mine is too cheap for that).Do you think i'm right when I say both hardness and durability keep a blade from shattering? don't get mad, don't get even, get ahead
October 25, 200520 yr Author think so....for fencig blades, i can say they are quite flexibe... The stronger swordsman does not always win.
December 31, 200619 yr Author Whoa, just read this thread I started a while back...now that I own a katana, I can confirm some of the facts...I've learned a lot from the posts above. It gave me perspective for future researches. Thanks. If any of you still have something to say, I'm all ears (eyes)... The stronger swordsman does not always win.
January 1, 200719 yr It is going to depend on the skill level of the fighters involved. I don't believe that one culture's 'style' is superior to the other. https://www.haysgym.com http://www.sunyis.com/ https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
January 1, 200719 yr when dealing with european weaponry, the thought was that strength was the key ability needed to take down your opponentthe Japanese philosophy was more on elegance and skill, being graceful and precise.my guess is that the knight would come in strong, attempting to take out the samurai in one massive sweep of his sword....relying on his strength to crush any defense the samurai might have.I think the samurai, would wait for the approaching knight, sidestep at the last second out of the way, as the knights momentum takes him forward the samurai continues his spin from the sidestep, bringing his katana in a graceful, quick arc coming down at an angle from the back side of the knights neck ...thus ending the fight.just my generic, stereotypical view of the history and situation...This is a misconception about European fighting styles. They trained very hard, and very well, and also knew how to fight hand to hand. I think saying that a samurai would win on the first blow is quite unrealistic. Do you really think that a European knight would try to not kill on the first stroke? https://www.haysgym.com http://www.sunyis.com/ https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
Create an account or sign in to comment