aefibird Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 Which would you say was the better exercise - a mile of swimming or a mile of running? I swim pretty regularly (3-4 times a week usually, more if I'm off work on holiday), but one of the guys at my karate club has told me that I'd be better off running instead, as it is better excercise. I was always under the impression that both are good cardio and that neither is better than the other. I generally swim between 1 and 1 & 1/2 miles per session, alternating breast stroke, front crawl and back stroke (I can swim butterfly, but I'm very bad at it!). "Was it really worth it? Only time and death may ever tell..." The Beautiful South - The Rose of My CologneSheffield Steelers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TangSooGuy Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 If anything, I'd sooner believe that swimming is better exercise than running... it seems like your using more muscles in swimming...I know I'd rather run a mile than swim a mile any day..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMA Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 Swim. More complete workout. Gentler on the joints. Ask your friend to do the 'fly for a mile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red J Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 Without a doubt, swimming a mile is a better workout. My reasoning is that the average person can run a mile in 8-10 minutes and that same person would take 25-30 minutes swimming a mile. You spend more time with an elevated heart rate swimming a mile than you do running a mile. Now, given equal times like 30 minutes versus 30 minutes I pick running. I feel like a get a better workout and have an easier time breathing. Here is a link that demonstrates that running burns more calories. http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/health/exercise-heart/page3.htm I don't see a problem with your swimming for cardio. If you enjoy it why stop? In other words, if it's not broken don't fix it. I had to lose my mind to come to my senses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soul fighter Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 I'd swim if I knew how So I just run instead THE MASTER OF THE WORLD'S FINEST!!SOUL SONIC STYLE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radok Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 I am a cross country runner, and to me it seems like running is more taxing on the cardio-vascular system's endurance, while swimming is more taxing on the muscular system. If you can't laugh at yourself, there's no point. No point in what, you might ask? there's just no point.Many people seem to take Karate to get a Black Belt, rather than getting a Black Belt to learn Karate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 I'd say go for the swimming. I run and swim regularly (Runs in the EARLY mornings, swim in the afternoon). I feel running definately gets me breathing harder (Especially after I sprint) but I love swimming and swimming plenty of laps still gives you a good cardio workout. Work on your butterfly! That's probably the best stroke for wearing you out. The game of chess is much like a swordfight; you must think before you move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaos666 Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 running is avery good endurance and strength building excersice, the only problem with it is that it is hard on your bones and joints, you may have problems later on... swimming is just awesome, it works of strength, endurance, lung capacity and is much more intence than running, plus it goes easy on your joints... only problem is that it's not as accessiable if you can, swim and run, that will give your the best of both worlds... A true shinobi is not defined by the number or quality of techniques he uses, but by the will and the determinations he has to improve himself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMA Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 I am a cross country runner, and to me it seems like running is more taxing on the cardio-vascular system's endurance, while swimming is more taxing on the muscular system. Does not compute. Any exercise that requires prolonged, arduous activity by the mucular system will require an influx of oxigen to those muscles. That in turn taxes your cardio-vascular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aefibird Posted August 10, 2004 Author Share Posted August 10, 2004 Work on your butterfly! Yeah, I'm trying to. When I was younger I swam for my school, as well as a local club. However, my main stroke was back crawl, so I used to spend most of my time doing that. I never did 'fly much. My mum is a retired swimming instructor/coach and she always says I look like I'm trying to kill myself by drowning everytime I swim butterfly. "Was it really worth it? Only time and death may ever tell..." The Beautiful South - The Rose of My CologneSheffield Steelers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts