Depends on what kind of holds you're applying to the person. An armbar will break the arm of anyone- regardless of how flexible they are. A choke will render anyone unconcious, regardless of how thick their neck is. Some people have flexible wrists, but theres a way to even catch those people. With their flexibility, you can bend their wrists and the move may fail, or you can twist their wrists and the move may fail, but if you bend and twist at the same time, you're sure to hurt them, and this holds true for just about any joint. Flexibility makes it more difficult to apply a lock on someone, but it wont make it impossible. What you stated is a matter of personal preference. Jiu Jitsu is much more than simply joint locks. Joint locks become more effective and usefull when you have control over someone, so natrually control is also an important aspect of jiu jitsu as well. As a result, many jiu jitsu fighters simply use their jiu jitsu to control people and elect to strike, rather than submit their opponents. As far as constantly battering your opponent to oblivion, you have that option whether it be in kempo or jiu jitsu. The only reason why you dont see that follow up in jiu jitsu is because when you choke someone unconcious, they're completely defenseless, so you dont actually need to train beyond that point.