bushido_man96

that's very interesting but, is the person who is given their belt first given it for a reason(like the instructor intentionally chooses so) or is it just randomly given, whoevers first is higher? In this situation, I would not use that as a chance to pull rank. If you two people receive the same rank on the same day, at the same promotion ceremony, then they are the same rank. If you need something to distinguish between the two, then you go by age. If it is that big of a deal, then those two really need to get a life.

Welcome to the Forums!

WOW! Not cool at all!!!

Yeah!!! With a marinade of Italian dressing...and Montreal steak seasoning...good stuff...

Way to go!

Nice explanation, NightOwl.

I don't really agree. The Olympics are the upper echelon of competition for TKD. Yes, there are those who like the sport side more than the other side. However, you can find many who enjoy the forms and more "artistic" side as well...they just don't end up competing internationally. There are still those who teach the self-defense applications of the style, and it does exist. It is just a matter of finding the instructor that does it. I think that being an Olympic sport is a good thing for TKD, because it keeps it in the limelight, and people recognize it. Sure, there are things that don't translate to self-defense, but it is the role of the instructor to make sure the student understands these things.

Sounds interesting. Where can it be seen?

Well, just keep up the training, cross.

It doesn't take anything away from your rank. In the end, it doesn't matter if it is called a dollyo chagi, or a round kick; as long as you make it work, that is what matters.

Consider that if every english speaking instructor used only english then you wouldnt have a problem at all. Also keep in mind that in most schools that use terminology from the native language of the system, they often have 2 names for the same thing, i.e. the name of the technique in the systems native language, and then the name of the technique in the instructors/students native language. So in my opinion, cut out the language that you dont normally speak and streamline the system to avoid confusion. But you still need an International standard language so that instructors from outside your native tongue can teach you. If you are in say a Japanese system then there are plenty of Japanese masters/teachers who would be definiately worth having a lesson off, you can't expect them to teach you in English if they aren't fluent. If you go to Europe or Aisa or wherever to train then if everyone knows a standard name for each technique life is going to be so much easier. You won't have to spend time messing around with translating the words "front punch" and can just get on with it. It makes sense (IMO anyway) for everyone, whatever country your from and whatever language you speak, to know one name per technique so that you can communicate. And if you have to pick that one language to communicate in then why not pick the language it where it comes from because chances are there are going to be more practitioners/teachers/masters speaking it natively. Only if you feel the need to take classes with those from other countries. I don't really feel the need to do so. I agree. There is going to come a point when the limited knowledge of the language through technique terminology is not going to do you any more good. Therefore, it is back to square one, and you will need more of a translation.

My point as well.

Cross makes some very good points. Regardless of the style you study, being faced by multiple attackers puts you at a disadvantage, regardless. You may be a great striker, but if someone wraps you up from behind, or bars one of your arms, then you are now only half the striker you were. I think that the video summed up well when dealing with multiple attackers: you figure out how to manage them.

Kicking does take a longer amount of time to develop proficiency in. I'll bet that there are quite a few South Korean practitioners that are skilled enough, and quick enough, to kick to the head on a regular basis. However, some of them have been spending most of their lives kicking.

Wow, that is a bummer. Hopefully, you can maintain your training, or find a place that suits your needs. Welcome to the Forums!

Why did this happen? If you don't mind me asking. nahh i don't mind at all. what happened was he was an Instructor at one school but because of a shift, i took over his school and he took over another. well, the school i took over started flourishing and doing exceptionally well meanwhile the school we had him take over went from 35 students to 17 almost overnight! most of the students he had lost were special need or special attention cases. we had a woman(a very respected red belt) come up to me and our chief and talk about how he has scared people away, made people upset, and almost caused a few fights. well after we heard this we were very upset, a few days later the payments for the school came into my chief and it was 200$ which is ridiculously low, and just enough to cover the instructors pay check for the month. so he was losing money, losing students, he had lost hte heart to teach, and at that month's tests his students looked poor. so we told him that his instructor duties were over and he could still keep his 3rd degree and train. and he's currently trying to train for his masters but if i get my way, that won't be this year, im still quite upset. That is an interesting story. Why do you want to prevent him from testing as a master?

Well, this is true. However, we don't always have the option of diffusion.

Gripping a lighter or some other fistpack object doesn't alter the already-trained punching hand of the Karate-ka. In fact, it would probably improve it. Although it may alter the sieken a bit, I don't think to the point of being that significant.

I don't think that there is anything wrong with using DVDs and books as training materials. I do it all of the time. However, doing video testings, I am not so sure about. I think that they are more of a scam than anything.

That is true. If knockout is legal, it should be considered.

I would take your questions to your instructor. You have a right to ask what the deal is. Ask politely, but be sure he gives you a straight answer. He may be testing you...who knows?

I agree with Zanshin. I appreciate your training goals, and understand them completely. However, there may be a Karate school out there that might suit your needs.

What target areas did you attack when using them? What kind of set ups did you use, and what were the results?

I could not agree more. Very well worded.

Why did this happen? If you don't mind me asking.