bushido_man96

I think there are times when a Martial Artist may have to make a descion that puts him in danger. At that time, they may become a warrior, for that brief time period. Now, with that said, one can train to have a warrior mind set, and approach life from a warrior point of view, as in always being prepared, checking surroundings, etc. But, I save the warrior title for those enlisted in the armed services. They are the ones likely to go to war, so they encompass it the most. One could make similar arguements in the LEO cirlces, as well, but I think it falls more to the enlisted men and women.

I don't believe it is. I think it came into vogue in America, but may have been invented by the Chinese immigrants. I think I saw that on Food Channel once.

Why? Do they freak seeing your strange underwear? Seriously, I cannot fully understand the pupose of this thread. For be it as it may, if one is all these things when they take off their belt, why bother to put one on in the first place? I think it is a good topic. I think the goal here is to make one think about what the display of rank means, or how it effects those who see it, and those who wear it. When I take off my belt....I don't even notice. Still the same person, even when I put it on.

Tito Ortiz vs. Forrest Griffin ...........................................Griffin Josh Koscheck vs. Anthony Johnson ...............................Koscheck Antonio Rogerio Nogueira vs. Luis Arthur Cane ...............Nogueira Dustin Hazelett vs. Karo Parisyan ..................................Parisyan Amir Sadollah vs. Phil Baroni ........................................Baroni Marcus Davis vs. Ben Saunders .....................................Saunders Paulo Thiago vs. Jacob Volkmann...................................Thiago Kendall Grove vs. Jake Rosholt ......................................Rosholt Brock Larson vs. Brian Foster ........................................Larson Caol Uno vs. Fabricio Camoes .......................................Camoes George Sotiropoulos vs. Jason Dent ...............................Dent

Hey, maybe I'm getting the hang of this...

Creative.

Go Chiefs!!!! Great to get a win! I love the rivalry between the Chiefs and Raiders.

Wow, that would be bad!!!

TKD tournaments tended to focus on kicking in competition, so they limited the hand strikes, and in some cases, attached higher point values to head kicking. Its just a different way of competing. I have competed in some TKD tournaments that did allow hand contact to the head. I prefer it that way, too.

I agree with ShoriKid's points so far. Here is a vid that made its rounds a few years ago, but it is a good illustration of what we are discussing here. Video: This is Pedro Sauer vs. Lance Bachelor, who was Mr. Utah 1992. What most people will see in this match is that the little guy won. What you have to sit back and realize are a few things, though: 1. How many of us are Pedro Sauer? Ok, with that said... 2. This fight went for a little while. If Pedro Sauer is that good, and it took Sauer that long to overcome a stregth advantage, then it should be something that is taken seriously into consideration by any fighter in any situation.

Just to turn this in a different tangent, have you asked yourself these questions? Are you going to stop training? Some people just enjoy different activities.

I think that this is a common example of over reaction, not unlike gun laws. Yeah, it doesn't make a lot of sense, but the lawmakers feel good because they think that they are accomplishing something.

I agree that there are good drills to do without a partner for sparring, but having a partner is optimal.

Aww, yes!! Raw cookie dough! Its the best. Now, if I combine that with my post-workout chocolate milk, I'll be sitting in high cotton! Awesome... Ok, maybe no one should take nutritional advise from me...

I think that this is great. If you didn't act in a rude or otherwise out-of-character manner from your normal self, then this was probably a good experience for both of you. Instead of looking at each other from a master-student perspective, you observed each other from a personal perspective. Isn't that the way it should be? There are also stories in mythologies about gods walking amongst the mortals as poor or beggars, to see how they are treated and received by the people when they don't know that they are in their presense. It gives a sense of what people really are like. Yeah, I know its a bit off topic, but something to think about....you never know when someone is checking things out.

This sums it up. Even if you have 5 minutes at a time, do some kicks, go over your form (even in your head, if you have to), or stand in a stance. These are simple things, but as time goes by, you'll discover even more things you can do to practice at home....like doing sets of side kicks between paragraphs of the book you are reading, while the wife and baby are sleeping....

I think that this feeling of immunity is exactly the problem. Rather than dressing the issue directly by examining and adjusting our training and attitudes, we pretend that we are above those inadequacies. We convince ourselves that the mere fact that we are martial artists delivers us from complacency, arrogance, ill temper, and a dozen other forms of hubris. This is exactly the complacent attitude that we need to avoid. When we start saying "A martial artist is humble. I am a martial artist. Ergo I must be humble," we assume that we already have certain attributes, and shut out the potential for improvement in those areas. I think there are some good words in here. They are things to be kept in mind, for certain.

I think that as time goes by, though, and one gains more experience, then one can begin to see the writing on the wall when it comes to good and bad. No, this isn't ideal, but it all comes around eventually.

Ah yes, blind loyalty is a very bad thing, in my opinion.

The distraction is enough to drive anyone mad!!!

Indeed. The guy with the blade would have to still have his drawn first. It is all situational In the situation that the '21 foot rule' was tested in, the knife wielder did NOT have the knife drawn at the moment of attack. The knife was drawn, and not from a good sheath, as they closed range. The situation was also however a demonstration of attack vs. response, and the main lesson, I feel, was to notify gun fans that a ranged weapon is not to be considered a panacea in situations involving moderate range. I would furthermore consider a gun not to be considered a panacea under any circumstances; I am told (I cannot verify this personally) that during a significant portion of the year, 10mm handguns are ineffective in my state; certain common types of typical winter clothing is sufficient to stop the bullets. Handguns are hardly a case of 'you fall over now' at best in any case; neither is a blade. Thanks for the clarification on the first part. My bad. I also agree that it isn't the answer to all the questions. Its just another choice. Slag: good post. Very solid.

True. But Couture is still competing. If Long wants to compete, then she should be all means. I mean she's one a fight already. And the other thing to consider is that just because some doesn't win, doesn't mean that they aren't fit to compete. It isn't as profitable as winning is, but it can still be done. The word has been that she still trains like a monster, and her drive is as high as ever. Might she lose? Sure. Might she win? Sure. When should she quit? When she wants to.

If you are worried about legal issues, seek legal advise. Other than that, I'd be inclined to say congrats, and to enjoy. Yeah, you may not have much experience teaching, but you won't get any if you don't start sometime.

Yeah. Great....

Its kind of tough to practice sparring drills on your own. Its one of those things that tends to be partner-based. Especially when timing, reactions, etc. come into play.