Hengest

What I mean is, how do you know that site is true? What books or other sources did you use to confirm what it says?

Actually it holds about as much water as the Titanic. You've just missed the point completely. I know what "bushi" means, I speak, read and write Japanese. And you wouldn't use it to describe a martial artist. The Iga village is a tourist attraction and nothing more. It is not a centre of serious academic research. My wife went and said it was the best laugh she's had in years.

What sources did you use to confirm the info at that link?

The meaning of "bushi", i.e. warrior, is quite different from that of "samurai". Does that mean they are seperate from samurai? Of course not. Apply the same thing in English: "professional soldier" vs. "guerilla fighter". Do they mean different things? Absolutely. Can one be both at the same time? Absolutely. Your argument holds no water whatsoever. For a start, the whole "ninja weaing masks" thing is probably fantasy anyway. It likely stems from the portrayal of ninja in kabuki theatre. Think about it. If I want to skulk about unnoticed in enemy territory am I going to wear black from head-to-toe or am I going to wear the uniform of the enemy's troops or perhaps the clothes of a merchant or serf that would be in the camp anyway? Even if the ninja costume is historically accurate, it would have had nothing to do with pride. I think it's time some people around these here parts put down the Ashida Kim books, switched off the Sho Kosugi movies, and started doing some proper research.

You'll get differing views on krav maga depending on who you speak to and schools you go to, but from what I've seen of it it looks like a pretty good no-nonsense self-defence method. Comhrac Bas, I'm more reserved about. I've not seen how its techniques work, but I'll tell you this much: it is not what it claims to be (i.e. a Celtic style used by Roman gladiators). That is just pure marketing * and a blatant lie. Who knows though, it might be an effective style. I'd have to leave comment on that to someone who has seen it.

JKD mean "jeet kune do", which is Bruce Lee's combat concept. It is a whole different thing to kali, but kali and JKD are often taught by the same instructor, hence the "/" in my styles list. See my post on your other thread re kali's techniques.

No don't worry mate. Ask away, we've all gotta start somewhere. I've only been in kali for about a year and I learn it from my JKD instructor. I'm not really an expert in the style, but I'll tell you what I know. Kali is a Filipino style, also called eskrima or arnis, which is primarily a weapon-based art. You usually start by learning how to use a single stick around 1.5'-2' in length, then go on to double sticks, knife, knife and stick, and other weapon combos, as well as unarmed techniques. The important thing to learn in kali though is that for all these, movement patterns are the same. You apply the same principles whether you have a stick, knife or nothing at all. There are few kicks, and what there are are usually low, aimed at the opponents legs. There's a fair bit of grappling and open hand striking and one of kali's trademarks is "gunting". This is a defensive method whereby, rather than blocking, you strike at the opponent's limb as it attacks. And the way Matt Damon flows in his fight scenes in Bourne Identity is very typical of kali's "body in motion" methodology. Hope that helps. Cheers,

What is so difficult to understand? Those of us advocating pre-emptive striking are NOT saying you should initiate confrontations. Once you are in a confrontation that you cannot get out of, as a defensive measure, hit first. It's that simple.

A ridiculous comparison. Training MA doesn't ware down the muscles to the point that they need to rest for any more than a day or two. Lifting, when done properly, requires a great deal more rest. For the record, I never said workout once a week. I said work out each body part once a week. To get maximum instensity in that workout, you will need to split to some degree. And a minimalist approach does not mean minimal results. Neither does it mean minimal intensity. The workouts you do are hard and that combined with greater rest periods and decent nutrition is where the gains come from. Don't knock it till you've tried it.

If you're working that body part heavy enough, I'd say you only really need to hit it once a week.

3-4 times a week per body part?! Way, way, WAY too much! What on earth would you recommend if he was pro?! Compound movements are of course the most important, but these exercises are not simply bodybuilding movements. In fact I'll give you 2-1 that most bodybuilders don't even do L-flys. However, they do serve to strengthen the smaller support muscles that are vital to injury prevention and good form. For example, if you're not incorporating L-flys into your routine (or another movement to strengthen the rotator cuff) and you're lifting heavy on overhead presses or pulldowns for instance, you're putting yourself at much greater risk of injury. I don't think I've ever heard anybody say "Whoa, look at the rotator cuffs on that guy!", have you? No. So how can it be a pure bodybuilding exercise? They put an enormous amount of stress on the elbow, plus, if you're training for strength, they serve little or no purpose.

MA = martial art TKD = taekwondo (a Korean martial art) kata = Japanese term for set or series of movements either practiced solo (as in karate) or in pairs (as in judo) dojo = Japanese name for a martial arts training area; you can be more specific e.g. judojo - judo training hall, kendojo - kendo hall, kyudojo - archery range kumite - sparring

For The Bourne Identity, Matt Damon trained in both kali and boxing. What you see is a movie-fu combination of the two.

As you've probably noticed Jay, I'm very minimalist in my approach to weights. I think you'll find that weight training is not an exact science in that different things work for different people. That said, I am of the opinion that probably 80% of people out there lifting weights are over-training to some extent. For chest, I bench press two or three sets of 8-10 reps once a week, and that's it. (Told you I was minimalist. ) I think dips are also great, but I do those instead of bench pressing rather than in addition to. And I would probably lose the machine flys altogether; if you're not a competitive bodybuilder, I don't think they serve any real purpose. I take the same approach to most exercises. Overhead press, pulldowns, stiff-legged deadlift, leg curls, bicep curls, L-flys and crunches, I all use roughly the same sets, reps, and training frequency. The main exception is squats (or leg press). I still do that once a week, but instead I do one working set of 20 reps, usually with quite a lot of rest pauses towards the end. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong. I couldn't possibly without seeing how you train and the gains you're making from it. However, I do think that if more people cut back on the amount of training they did, allowing for more rest and recuperation and keeping workouts to the basics, short and sweet, they'd see far more gains than they ever have. I know I did.

Well said ovine king. It's about time all these myths about ninja and ninjutsu were put to rest. Unfortunately, it seems informed people such as yourself are in the minority.