battousai16 Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 btw, where were you during my debate with kchenault? i could have used the support! "I hear you can kill 200 men and play a mean six string at the same time..."-Six String Samurai
fireka Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 stupid new zealander! us americans dont have to spell! we have bigger guns than all the literate countries! "i could dance like that!.......if i felt like it...." -Master Betty
battousai16 Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 touché! who needs intelligence when you have guns? "I hear you can kill 200 men and play a mean six string at the same time..."-Six String Samurai
G95champ Posted July 23, 2003 Author Posted July 23, 2003 "I am happy they are dead these 2 guys were prob. the most evil and sick men the world has seen. IMO Hitler had nothing on them." ...either you need to do more research or i do... You do. Im a history teacher and I know a fair bit about Hitler and these 2 guys. Hitler had others do his dirty work for him. These guys took pleasure in doing it themselves. (General George S. Patton Jr.) "It's the unconquerable soul of man, and not the nature of the weapon he uses, that ensures victory."
Shorin Ryuu Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 Hmmm....this is a really twisted quality vs. quantity debate... Martial Arts Blog:http://bujutsublogger.blogspot.com/
battousai16 Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 perhaps, but at least they were upfront about it. hitler lied to an entire nation and brought them all down with him. and lets not pretend hitlers hands were clean from blood, i'm sure he alone killed just as many as saddam's sons. though i gotta say i don't know that much about all of what saddam's sons did, aside from a general idea. "I hear you can kill 200 men and play a mean six string at the same time..."-Six String Samurai
Fenris-wolf Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 You do. Im a history teacher and I know a fair bit about Hitler and these 2 guys. Hitler had others do his dirty work for him. These guys took pleasure in doing it themselves. Hmm. Interesting point. But then it gets down to definition of "evil", and who really has the authority to decide that? I suppose on a one-on-one basis, Saddam's sons were "worse". I personally got my back up over what I perceived as a direct comparison between "9-11" (I hate that that's a mainstream term. ) and the holocaust. Let Us Turn The Jump Rope In Accord With Socialist Principles!
G95champ Posted July 23, 2003 Author Posted July 23, 2003 Are you serious?????????? I'm horrified that you'd make such a broad statement. Sure, I don't know enough about Saddam to back up my statements, but I can't believe that you would dismiss something as horrific like WWII because you are fired up about current events. Jesus! Hundreds of thousands of people were killed, raped, tortured and experimented on during that war for no reason better than blind racism. In comparison to what? What exactly did Saddam do that is comparible to that mass slaughter? I severely doubt you paid much attention to what he did in the Middle East before your government started spouting their propoganda! Saddam and his sons are not good people but for god's sake, think before you speak. Again I know what Im talking about.... Hitler did all kinds of bad stuff no question and by numbers alone it was worse. However not to make it right Hitler did have an plan and method for the madness. Sure he hated Jews but he also was trying to make a superace of people. That don't make it right but the Nazi did a lot of experments in medicine on the people they killed. I am not supporting Hitler by any means but at least he killed and got something out of it. On the other hand Saddam and his boys killed for fun. Mass graves by the thousand have been found. These are his own people to same religon and faith. He cut peoples arms off for fun not for anyother reason. Eletric shot, anal probes, lashings, gross evile stuff. Making people drink gas and shot them so they will explode type stuff. The only thing they got out of their killing was a good laugh. Thats not funny. Also Hitler done it first and that don't make it ok but that means everyone else should know better. These guys are on the same leval. Watch the specails on the history ch. See for yourself. You don't have to agree with my opinions, but what you just said is ignorant beyond belief. (General George S. Patton Jr.) "It's the unconquerable soul of man, and not the nature of the weapon he uses, that ensures victory."
John G Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 im convinced Fenris that its mostly out of jealousy that you hate us *snikers* (dosent even have 1 air craft carrier) *snikers* They don’t need an aircraft carrier they have the haka John G Jarrett III Dan, ITF Taekwon-Do
fireka Posted July 23, 2003 Posted July 23, 2003 i dont mean to affend (wait yes i do) but ive never seen anytone purposely try and back up a statement by saying, 'im a history teacher' the first rule of history text book: the nation the book was published controls the history, not history itself. try looking at a british history book and look under the american Revolution. didnt find it/ yea, check 'The Colonist bloody rebelion" a bit of a difrent perspective. the truth about history is usally a mix of everyones story with a little bit added we will never know about. History teachers are limited by there respective goverments. "i could dance like that!.......if i felt like it...." -Master Betty
Recommended Posts