Warp Spider Posted August 20, 2003 Share Posted August 20, 2003 It's not compressed gas fuel. Inert gas is stored under pressure to propel a liquid fuel. It is a similar principal to a compressed-air paint sprayer or a pumper jug, but much more powerful. Also I never said that they don't hit or that they are simultaneous, but they are very quick and generally don't have much power. Paladin - A holy beat down in the name of God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryLove Posted August 20, 2003 Share Posted August 20, 2003 Not all of that post was enccessiarily at you. The "not actually hit" iomment was not, the simultanious commet was (since you are mentioning "deliver the punch with a leg in the air", and obviously the one addressed directly to you is. https://www.clearsilat.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warp Spider Posted August 21, 2003 Share Posted August 21, 2003 Well, yes, but a jab snaps out and is back within a tiny fraction of a second. The value of a kick as a distraction would have expired by the time your kick returned. That is why I said you would have to make the punch before your leg was returned. Paladin - A holy beat down in the name of God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryLove Posted August 21, 2003 Share Posted August 21, 2003 I disagree both with the statement that you cannot simultaniously punch and kick and get a good hit, and with the assertation that one cannot rrecover from a kick and still have the distraction value. https://www.clearsilat.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted August 21, 2003 Share Posted August 21, 2003 sounds like a comment from a guy who isn't balanced when kicking doesn't it jerry? post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warp Spider Posted August 22, 2003 Share Posted August 22, 2003 I dunno, I just can't see it working, but that's just me. Paladin - A holy beat down in the name of God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imoñ Posted August 22, 2003 Share Posted August 22, 2003 well if sombodys throwing a haymaker at you there isnt any time to waste with a destraction, dont bother doing anything fancy like throwing or ducking, hit them in the face before they finish the slow haymaker then use the knees, elbows and throat strikes to finish them off, simple, unclean but effective Shotokan Karate - brown belt 2nd kyuJudo - Yellow beltJujustu - recently started, white belt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warp Spider Posted August 22, 2003 Share Posted August 22, 2003 Actually the distraction discussion was in regards to making the haymaker more effective, not in defending against it. It was in response to an assertion that haymakers are unilaterally an ineffective attack. Paladin - A holy beat down in the name of God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryLove Posted August 25, 2003 Share Posted August 25, 2003 That said, I can't seem to easily imagine where I would want a haymaker over a faster/harder to block/ harder hook. https://www.clearsilat.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted August 25, 2003 Share Posted August 25, 2003 my friend does drunken boxing, and he said he'd mix some styles up for that... throw himself to the floor, and use his legs to sweep him and put on a hold... of course, i dont know how fast he can safely fall to the floor. logical method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now