kle1n Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 i would use the fork or pheraps empty hands Be everything. Be nothing.
Raiden Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 Forks definately. Much easier to eat with. I prefer to kill the people at my dinner table with my bare hands so I don't need no stinking chop sticks to take them out White Belt-Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu
Synaesthesia Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 Although forks require less skill, many foods can be eaten faster with chopsticks. I also believe that sharp chopsticks constitute better weapons than forks due to their smaller striking area, greater length and superior numbers.
Davison Posted May 26, 2003 Posted May 26, 2003 chopsticks! Why punch someone when their on the ground when you can just kick them
1ONEfighting Posted May 26, 2003 Posted May 26, 2003 Reminds me of an old Seinfeld bit. Picture chinese farmers, working all day with a pitchfork and a shovel, and what do they base their eating utensils on? Two pool cues. Trainwreck Tiemeyerwishes he was R. Lee Ermey.
Drunken Monkey Posted May 30, 2003 Posted May 30, 2003 i think i'm going to have to support the chopsticks on this one. obviously you have to look at how you eat with chopticks. i mean, you won't use a knife and fork with a bowl so don't think about using chopsticks with a dinner plate. both ends of chopsticks can be used to pick up food to maintain a certain leverl of hygiene, and with a bowl, well, have you seen a chinese scoop rice into his mouth? a bowl can go from full to empty in a matter of secondes. and then there's the point of if you can't use chopsticks like how they're meant to, you can still spear the food with a single chopstick. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite."
Recommended Posts