Zaine Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 A while ago, Drew made a post giving some tips on being a practitioner of Martial Arts. In it, they mention that "The forms of Tai Chi contain much of the metaknowledge you will need to even stand a chance against some one who is trained, taller, etc." That got me thinking about the metaknowledge of Martial Arts altogether and I have been contemplating it for nearly 2 months. I feel like I have a shaky understanding of what that is, but I am curious about what y'all think when you hear the phrase Martial Arts Metaknowledge. Is it our understanding of technique? Is it the pedagogy and teaching behind a MA curriculum? Is it the ability to size up an opponent? What are your thoughts? Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 Could be some underlying principles that tend to apply to all MAs in general? https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaine Posted June 12, 2023 Author Share Posted June 12, 2023 That's a good thought, Brian. Perhaps metaknowledge refers to our principles in general. Things that contribute to discipline and our understanding of the side of martial arts that relates to character development. Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei8 Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 Seems that Shu Ha Ri is what Metaknowledge is in regards to the MA. Afterall, Moreover, Shu Ha Ri is a universal principle that describes the natural order in which mastery is attained. It's a concept that describes the stages of learning to mastery, and without experience there's no knowledge, no matter the type of knowledge. Metaknowledge being defined as knowledge about knowledge, however, all types of knowledge are dormant without applied experience.There's the underpinning that states...The summation of 'Why" is to the summation of 'Because'. Techniques, for example, for them to become effective must first mature, and for them to mature, there must be knowledge, but first there must be a correlation of experience.Imho!! **Proof is on the floor!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now