Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow Ok. Sorry to hear this Bob.

Forgive me but can I ask what the Kaicho and Kancho did or were they more ceremonial roles?

What was the reason given for eliminating these positions?

"Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it." ~ Confucius

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Posted
Does this mean organization your organization has no executive leaders?

All Hierarchy departments are still active, therefore, executive leadership across the board exists, for the moment.

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Posted

Sorry to hear about this, Bob. Doesn’t sound very good. I know you’ll pull through and right by everyone; you seemingly always have. Going solely by what I’ve seen you post here over the past 3 years or so I’ve been here, it appears you’ve been through more trying times in the organization than this. Not that that’s any consolation by any means; it’s just my way of saying I know you’re strong enough to not let this get the best of you.

Posted
Sorry to hear about this, Bob. Doesn’t sound very good. I know you’ll pull through and right by everyone; you seemingly always have. Going solely by what I’ve seen you post here over the past 3 years or so I’ve been here, it appears you’ve been through more trying times in the organization than this. Not that that’s any consolation by any means; it’s just my way of saying I know you’re strong enough to not let this get the best of you.

Thanks, JR; your support, as well as your kind words always mean a lot to me.

There's more than one way to skin a cat, and if that way's not forthcoming, then I'll make a way.

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Posted
Wow Ok. Sorry to hear this Bob.

Forgive me but can I ask what the Kaicho and Kancho did or were they more ceremonial roles?

What was the reason given for eliminating these positions?

Kaicho/Kancho are not ceremonial roles, by any stretch of the imagination. Dai-Soke held the Kaicho position, under Soke, from 1950 to 2008, 58 years.

Nothing!! To our knowledge, neither did anything to warrant their decisions, personally and/or professionally.

So why?!?

Reason of Redundancy!!

The Board expressed that having a Kaicho AND a Kancho, while they're important positions for the sake of the check and balance affect, were antiquated, yet, we admirably had fulfilled our expectations, as well as our responsibilities of obligations. The Board, furthermore, expressed that the existence of the Board was far more than adequate to run the day to day operations effectively, whereas, the Kaicho and Kancho positions are superfluous, in that, the Board absorbs both the Kaicho and Kancho, henceforth. Our Legal Team states that a Silo Effect seems to have taken residency unwittingly by either parties.

One other reason, directed directly to me, was the Mobility Clause; however, that was ruled in my favor due to the fact that I was grandfathered through Dai-Soke to administrate mobile, in which, conference calls via Skype and/or cellphone, are admissibly approved by all parties.

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Posted

I'm sorry to hear this, Bob. I know you'll rebound through this. What does this mean for you now? Does this mean that governing body will basically be able to keep you removed from any kind of decision making when it comes to Shindokan?

Posted
I'm sorry to hear this, Bob. I know you'll rebound through this. What does this mean for you now? Does this mean that governing body will basically be able to keep you removed from any kind of decision making when it comes to Shindokan?

Thanks, Brian!!

For Kancho and me, it simply means...

Temporalis Auctoritate...Temporary Authority. Until the By-Laws have been amended, and then approved by a unanimous vote, we've full authority. Plus, we've appealed the vote, even though it appears to be a lock on us turning in the store keys when all is said and done. Transitions of this magnitude can take a minute or two to reach its final conclusion.

In time, should we both be thrown out on our backsides, and while we'll still be members, in good standings, with the SKKA, we'll have no say so as to the daily operations of the SKKA. However, I'm the highest ranking member across the board, and that carries some hefty perks that can't be removed and/or denied and/or refused; FOR LIFE clauses!!

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Posted
I'm sorry to hear this, Bob. I know you'll rebound through this. What does this mean for you now? Does this mean that governing body will basically be able to keep you removed from any kind of decision making when it comes to Shindokan?

Thanks, Brian!!

For Kancho and me, it simply means...

Temporalis Auctoritate...Temporary Authority. Until the By-Laws have been amended, and then approved by a unanimous vote, we've full authority. Plus, we've appealed the vote, even though it appears to be a lock on us turning in the store keys when all is said and done. Transitions of this magnitude can take a minute or two to reach its final conclusion.

In time, should we both be thrown out on our backsides, and while we'll still be members, in good standings, with the SKKA, we'll have no say so as to the daily operations of the SKKA. However, I'm the highest ranking member across the board, and that carries some hefty perks that can't be removed and/or denied and/or refused; FOR LIFE clauses!!

:)

So you're not a majority owner of the SKKA?

Teachers are always learning

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...