Matsubayashi-Ryu and Chito-Ryu?

[username19853]

Hey guys,

I used to study Matsubayashi-Ryu under Sensei Jerry Figgiani in New York. I loved it so much. I Joined the Marine Reserves and now live in Pittsburgh, PA. I have the Essence of Okinawan Karatedo that I picked up while I was in NC. It helps a lot, but I miss being in a dojo and all that fun stuff.

There's a dojo near me that teaches Chito-Ryu. A member told me its Okinawan, but I've never heard of it. So my main question is, how similar are these two styles? I plan on returning to study under Sensei Figgiani someday but for now I just need something to supplement Matsubayashi. Are they close enough? Too different? Am I better off trying to keep studying Matsubayashi on my own for the next 5+ years? I think you guys know what I'm trying to say. Any and all information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

[Wastelander]

Chito-Ryu is a bit of an odd style, being an amalgam of methods from teachers of different styles, and having kata that were created specifically as expansions by the creator of the style. There are some kata that you will find are similar to Matsubayashi-Ryu, but there is a lot that is different, as well. Here is an example of Chito-Ryu kata:

[JR 137]

IMO studying under someone is always better than studying alone (there's rare exceptions to every rule).

Even I'd they're not close, you'd get experience with different things that could help a lot with what you studied before. Or you could find Chito-Ryu better suits you.

It's about the teacher and classmates, not the art/style IMO. Go in with an open mind, and know that nothing is going to be the same as your previous school. Your previous school won't be the same when you return either. Students come and go, and teachers can and do change.