jeffin Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 THE MAIN DIFFERENCE IS THAT KUNG FU FORMS TEND TO BE MORE FASTE FLOWING WITH KARATEKA KATA TEND TO BE LESS FLOWING. KARATE IS MORE LIKE ONE PUNCH KILL AND KUNG FU IS MORE FLOWING, LIKE HIT THE GUY 5 TIMES. LOOK AT A KUNG FU VIDEO AND A KARATE VIDEO, I HAVE STUDIED KARATE AND PRAYING MANTIS ""QUOTE"" Seriously is there a nomination for daft post of the week or what? The superior man is modest in his speech, but excels in his actions.Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)Crosstraining in bjj/silat/muaythai/jkd/JJJ/kickboxing
Tobias_Reece Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 I have to agree with you on that one Jeffin "You Are Never Given A Dream Without Also Being Given The Power To Make It True. You May Have To Work For It, However"Principal Kobudo Instructor & OwnerWest Yorkshire Kobudo Academy2nd Kyu (Matayoshi Okinawan Kobudo, IOKA UK)
jiu-jitsu fighter Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 i wrote that last sentence to back up my answer "When we go to the ground,you are in my world, the ground is the ocean, I am the shark,and most people don't even know how to swim"
jiu-jitsu fighter Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 personnaly i think they are both very innfective arts in their own special way "When we go to the ground,you are in my world, the ground is the ocean, I am the shark,and most people don't even know how to swim"
jeffin Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 Its the enormous over simplification that got me and the total innaccuracy not the last sentence. Your posts are hard to understand as well what is innfective? The superior man is modest in his speech, but excels in his actions.Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)Crosstraining in bjj/silat/muaythai/jkd/JJJ/kickboxing
karatekid1975 Posted January 5, 2003 Posted January 5, 2003 Hiya, guys. Keep it calm here, please. This is a art vs art section of the form, but we don't need flame wars or putting each other (or arts) down Thanks. Laurie F
Kyle-san Posted January 6, 2003 Posted January 6, 2003 personnaly i think they are both very innfective arts in their own special way
Kensai Posted January 6, 2003 Posted January 6, 2003 @ Jeffin, Tobais it looks like you will have to don your troll books and smash this newbee! Yours in Aiki.
jiu-jitsu fighter Posted January 6, 2003 Posted January 6, 2003 sorry bout that ill try to break it down for u guys "When we go to the ground,you are in my world, the ground is the ocean, I am the shark,and most people don't even know how to swim"
magikchiongson Posted January 9, 2003 Posted January 9, 2003 That's a strange question to answer. Obviously we see a difference between Aikido and Karate, there's just so many styles of Kung Fu. Basically, Karate is slower than Kung Fu and less powerful. I know yall differentiate between Judo and Karate so why not do the same for the Chinese Styles? Kung Fu is just a blanket term for all the Martial Arts Practiced in China and Chinese Satellite States. As for which is more affective, I really think Kung Fu is. Don't get mad, its just my observation. In the style I'm learning now, we have a very diverse background of people training. Some from Karate some from Kung Fu, some from Jiu Jitsu ect. What I noticed was, that during flow drills, I could always accurately count how many strikes were thrown by people who earned blackbelts in Karate styles just by vision alone. While the Kung Fu fighters I would have no clue how many shots were thrown other than the rapid beat when the strikes hit. They notice that they are a tad bit slower than the other students who weren't used to striking the Karate way, but that's ok. As for one shot kills, Choy Li Fut is famous for that. In fact several Kung Styles have the capability of delivering 7-8 Death Strikes in a second, with strikes to the temple, throat, nose, ect. That's the trick of it, most Karate Styles require a rechambering of your primary weapons Most Chinese Styles simply continue the flow. I own you.
Recommended Posts