SonGoku92 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 Backfist IMHO is not really an attack one can use all the time. but as with any technique has its place. I try to use it a little closer than most people because if a stretched out backfist is blocked it tends to cause problems for me. but thats just me. but I tend to have my own version of everything. lol "I am the hope of the universe! I am the answer to all living things that cry out for peace,I am protector of the innocent, I am the light in the darkness, I am truth... Ally to good! nightmare to you!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitehand Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 The backfist is a great technique. Not to be seen as better or worse than a jab. It all depends on how you train it. Find a guy who can't keep his hands up a back fist works every time. Get a guy to drop his hands a backfist works every time. It appears to me that many people see it as a "tag your it" technique. Well if that's how you train it that's all it will do. If you train it to drop people that's what it will do. It's great off angles and its great to set something up. But if you don't like it you probably won't use it and this won't develope which is no problem. The traditional blocks used as commonly misunderstood "blocks" probably won't help you at all because except in the rarest cases or "modified shortened" versions traditional karate blocks don't work at all. But then again, I personally don't think there are any blocks in Karate. If you like Shotokan but don't want to give up knockdown fighting see if some of your dojo mates want to train that way with you in whatever time you have available. Also you can still compete and such. "Karate is about digging deeper, not climbing higher." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guird Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 The problem with the backfist for the goal you're trying to accomplish is that it doesn't work with gloves. in kickboxing/mma it won't have much effect because it uses the small surface area of the back of the knuckle to strike a weak point such as the temple. more of a precision strike than a powerful one. That said, the spinning backfist has made a few, fairly succesful appearances in MMA. The traditional blocks, done traditionally are pretty useless I have to agree, and even more so in MMA. a lot of them are more intended to break out of someone's grip, etc, some are meant to double as a hammerfist or forearm strike. However, merits exist. blocking with a twist of the forearm is a very quick, efficient way to block that leaves a relatively small opening while still forcing the punch away. it has more of a place in mma, which has smaller gloves than in (kick)boxing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaine Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Tradition blocks generally turn out to be strikes. I would disagree with calling them useless. Generally Martial Arts (whichever it may be) don't teach "useless" techniques. Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guird Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I just started reading this guy's stuff. http://dandjurdjevic.blogspot.nl/2008/06/why-blocks-do-work.htmlIt isn't shotokan, but it's relevant. by his argument, karate blocks won't do you much good in (kick) boxing, but may be quite helpful in MMA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei8 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I just started reading this guy's stuff. http://dandjurdjevic.blogspot.nl/2008/06/why-blocks-do-work.htmlIt isn't shotokan, but it's relevant. by his argument, karate blocks won't do you much good in (kick) boxing, but may be quite helpful in MMA.Well, I'm still of the old school that doesn't block, we deflect said attack. **Proof is on the floor!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I just started reading this guy's stuff. http://dandjurdjevic.blogspot.nl/2008/06/why-blocks-do-work.htmlIt isn't shotokan, but it's relevant. by his argument, karate blocks won't do you much good in (kick) boxing, but may be quite helpful in MMA.I didn't get through all the article, but he had some very good points and input into his thoughts on blocking, and how gloved fighting styles affect one's ablility to use traditional blocking methods. Thanks for posting that for us. Very informative. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guird Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Sensei 8, yes, that is his point and I agree. block is a poor translation for uke , parry matches it better, though not perferctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitehand Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Receive. Receive is what Uke means "Karate is about digging deeper, not climbing higher." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei8 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Receive. Receive is what Uke meansYes, but it's so misunderstood, imho, because practitoners are thinking along the lines of blocking because said waza might be called, for example, Rising Forearm BLOCK, and then, they think they're suppose to block, instead of its true intent...deflect!!Once the mind wraps around BLOCK, they're having to be reprogrammed to treat it as a DEFLECTION. **Proof is on the floor!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now