MisterMcDojo Posted January 21, 2013 Posted January 21, 2013 Hello everyone. I'm just curious in regards to the benefits in training in full contact karate, and the benefits in training in non-full contact karate.I hear that training full contact, like Kyokushin, helps much more in the overall training experience because the focus on the training is tougher. You are supposed to throw actual strong punches to your opponent, to not only improve your skill as a fighter, but also hard training strengthens your body. It's not a point system. Where one touch gets you a win. I, personally, don't see the benefits in training in non contact. Because how is that supposed to make you a better fighter? In a real fight, you can't just touch your opponent and win. You are doing yourself a dis-service to training in the martial arts by not practicing in full contact.Martial arts has really become "martial sports", if you understand what I mean. If you look at how karate has become. The JKA is one of those heavy influences in spreading "martial sports" around, and I don't think it benefits the user in the long run to train like that. Full contact, from my research, is the best way to train. To become a better martial artist.However, I could be wrong. And as so I dedicated my question over here on the forums. What are the pros and cons between the two training regiments? Is my entire assessment flawed? How so? I'm curious, because I would like to get solid closure on my question. Is there a benefit to training non full contact over full contact?
ps1 Posted January 21, 2013 Posted January 21, 2013 Welcome to the forums.I don't think you're gonna find alot of people around here who will tell you that full contact is bad. However, there is a direct correlation between the level of contact and the likelihood of injury. The best full contact fighters in the world don't spar full contact all the time. They deconstruct the skills and train them individually. They do full contact maybe once a week...sometimes even less, depending on their training cycle. So, to answer your question, I would say both. Full contact is certainly necessary, IMO, if you're looking for skill in combat situations. But doing it too often will break down the body for sure.That said, I see virtually no self defense benefit to point sparring. If you're doing light sparring, it should still be with combinations. "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenius."
Dobbersky Posted January 21, 2013 Posted January 21, 2013 A Blackbelt SHOULD be able to fight in any arena.Non-contact is like sending a soldier to the frontline with an M16 after only ever trained with a broomstick "Challenge is a Dragon with a Gift in its mouth....Tame the Dragon and the Gift is Yours....." Noela Evans (author)
bushido_man96 Posted January 23, 2013 Posted January 23, 2013 Martial arts has really become "martial sports", if you understand what I mean. If you look at how karate has become. The JKA is one of those heavy influences in spreading "martial sports" around, and I don't think it benefits the user in the long run to train like that. Full contact, from my research, is the best way to train. To become a better martial artist.You seem to be pointing to the JKA as a producer of "Martial Sport." However, so is full contact a "Martial Sport." So is MMA. So is Wrestling. Boxing. Thai Boxing. Taekwondo, both point and Olympic. These are all Martial Sports. Its really about picking your rule set and going with it.Now, as for the difference between full-contact and lighter-contact. I believe that its important to train full and light. You can't train full all the time; you'll run out of training partners. However, there can be very beneficial light-contact drills that improve full-contact. MMA fighters, Boxers, etc all do different levels of contact training to work different skills. In the end, both ways are important.Now, there is a whole different argument in regards to sparring in point-style rule sets, and full contact rule sets. I'll leave that for a different thread. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
brickshooter Posted January 23, 2013 Posted January 23, 2013 No one daily trains in full contact. Full contact is reserved for competition. Here's how professionals do it: They load up the sparing partner with a ton of protective gear. Then the Champ gets to pound the sparing partner who is only allowed to hit back at 1/4 power. Nevertheless the Champ goes through 3-5 sparing partners per day because getting pounded is exhausting even if loaded with gear. In other words sparing partners are paid to be human punching bags. That is real life full contact training.
DaveAbramson Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 In my opinion... one would obviously be better (more skilled and certainly tougher) if they only sparred full (100%) contact. But this too would highly increase the chances of getting injured... and what good is an injured fighter?! My name is Dave and I attend martial arts classes in Gilbert, Arizona at Sandoval Freestyle Karate.
sensei8 Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 In my opinion... one would obviously be better (more skilled and certainly tougher) if they only sparred full (100%) contact. But this too would highly increase the chances of getting injured... and what good is an injured fighter?!Solid post!! **Proof is on the floor!!!
sensei8 Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 As its been already mentioned, both non-contact and full contact have their unique training advantages that I think can't be ignored nor denied. I do both, personally as well as professional. Personally, I love the full contact just as I love the air which I breathe, the more, the better. Professionally, my students need the vehicle of non-contact because it drives them to understand the mechanics of sparring.Don't do full contact if ones only doing it because "it's cool"; one's heart has to be ready and prepared for full contact. **Proof is on the floor!!!
seikokaistudent Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 Train full contact for sure. Full contact is generally for younger people who have time before their knees get blown out, and who recover/heal quicker. If you are young and have a sensei you really like who does not practice full contact (like me). Find an MMA gym to go to or spar full contact with your friends outside of class. Ready!!....FIREEEE!!!!... Aim...!!
chrissyp Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 What do you mean by full-contact? Do you mean full force, or full target range, like leg kicks, face punches, ect?As mentioned, do BOTH. You need full contact (not 100% full force though) to physicaly train both you mind and body for combat...prepare it for whats to come...as for non-full contact, use that time to work on perfect technique, have fun, play around with new things without worrying about getting smashed, aka time drills, handicap sparring.Point sparring, is great for beginners, cause it teaches control, while not realistic though, it does build confidence up. I find the biggest thing is a lot of people are scared to spar, even light contact. Per Aspera Ad Astra
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now