Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Is It Protection OR Insecurities?


Recommended Posts

Whenever a school of the MA denies access to their school and/or students...

Is it because they're protective of their students? Or is it because that they're insecure that they might lose some students for whatever reason(s)?

It can't be because styles aren't similar, that's why training EXCHANGES are sought after because not every style of the MA is all-that-and-a-bag-of-chips; something must be found other than the usual norm; limits are recognized.

I/Hombu deny excess only if I/we feel that what other styles of the MA have to offer is grossly insignificant in added depth to Shindokan. In that, we've opened our doors more than we've closed them.

:)

**Proof is on the floor!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

I would argue that it highly depends on which school we are talking about.

Personally I think schools should be open about most things. I think it is reasonable to exclude certain things that are reserved for higher level students because they've earned that level of secrecy through their commitment to the school.

However, whereas how the training is conducted and general rules are concerned there should be absolute transparency.

As to your question, I think that it mostly is insecurity with the label of protection.

Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.


https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...