Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMO, there's no real difference between a vertical fist or horizontal fist in any straight punching because your arm is only roughly 80% extended when you make contact with a target. And when arms are 80% extended, they're more or less vertical.

Criticisms of horizontal fists fail to appreciate that contact is not done with the arms 100% extended since that would be "touching" and generally reserved for tournament sparing.

Hooks are better with a vertical to protect the later two knuckles. However, I think the Kyokushin school teaches the safest hooks with an "inverted" vertical fist.

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
IMO, there's no real difference between a vertical fist or horizontal fist in any straight punching because your arm is only roughly 80% extended when you make contact with a target. And when arms are 80% extended, they're more or less vertical.

Criticisms of horizontal fists fail to appreciate that contact is not done with the arms 100% extended since that would be "touching" and generally reserved for tournament sparing.

Hooks are better with a vertical to protect the later two knuckles. However, I think the Kyokushin school teaches the safest hooks with an "inverted" vertical fist.

I am just not a fan of hooks, one of those prejudices that my teacher had. A straight punch just always gets in there faster. As far as power you're right, there isn't much diffence in how your fist is positioned. It's all about technique and whether or not you want to break your wrist. Vertical goes to the face , but not to the body because it's too easy to collapse your wrist back.

Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.


https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/

Posted
the vertical fist wasn't for speed, both punches were trained to be just as fast but it was a difference in where we were going to hit someone.

I was just getting ready to ask what kind of proof there was out there to susbstantiate that the vertical fist was faster than the horizontal fist punch. I'm not sure how the speed is affected by altering the angle of the fist.

Posted

The properly executed Isshinryu punch is launched from the side keeping the fist vertical the entire time. The elbow is kept close to the side and the shoulder is mostly quiet. The punch is targeted at the solar plexus, - not higher at the face or head. Striking with the first two knuckles of the hand and then snapped back - much like cracking a whip. At the completion of the punch the hand and arm are left in a position ready to punch or block again immediately with no wind up. When timed it is possible to land 3-4 of these punches in the time it takes to land one corkscrew punch, and if one believes the laws of physics i.e. Power=Speed x Mass it is easy to see that this punch is not only faster but more powerful that a twisting punch as well, as we are moving the same mass as in a twisting punch but with much more speed.

Biomechanically the punch/fist is also much more sound. Beginning at the fist and moving up the arm: The fist is made by holding the hand open and then slowly curling the fingers from the most distal knuckle until a fist tight enough to completely hide the fingernails is made. Then the thumb is pressed down on the second knuckle of the index finger. This makes an extremely hard and tight fist. Much less prone to injury, and a much more effective weapon.

Moving on to the wrist. Holding the fist vertically during the punch has the effect of distributing the impact to both the radius and ulna. Try a twisting punch and notice the position of the radius - especially when your target is on your opponents centerline - like the face or solar plexus. You will see that much more of the impact must be absorbed by the radius side of the joint where the joint is much "softer". Softer meaning that the joint on this side is comprised of small bones, cartilage and ligaments. Not to mention that the radius itself is by far the smaller, more fragile bone. The forearm is also left in a stronger blocking position. Blocking across the wide, muscular side of the arm instead of a single, exposed bone has obvious advantages.

Moving up the arm. In a twisting punch the elbow is turned outward, away from the body leaving it in probably it's most vulnerable position. When the joint is turned this direction and locked (as would happen if the punch was trapped, or slipped and countered) it takes little more than 20 pounds of pressure to dislocate or break the joint. Twisting the arm outward like this also has the effect of exposing the floating rib and in the case of a punch to the face or head also adducts the shoulder leaving it vulnerable to anterior dislocation and exposing a nice large vital/pressure point in the pit of the arm.

While this is a somewhat cerebral analysis of a simple punch it seems that most of this information is obvious to our subconscious minds. In thinking about this punch I realize that I rarely see even the most trained "corkscrew" puncher use one in a sparing match and even much less on the street. I think that one of Master Shimibuku's amazing talents was his ability to understand the state of Mu-Shin (no-mind) and to utilize it in a practical way. Imagine the power of knowing what the subconscious mind will do and training your body to be even better at it.

Posted

The vertical punches are far superior to horizontal when in close range and on an incoming opponent. A properly excited horizontal punch should corkscrew at the moment directly before impact. Shimabuku Sensei say this as weak because most often our opponent is charging at you. Therefore you never would get the full power of the strike in that situation.

"Live life easy and peacefully, but when it is time to fight become ferocious."

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I don't know if one way is better than the other but this is an awful lot of talk about limbs without mention of the tanden.

we all have our moments

Posted

Well, body alignment doesn't matter if the structure of the striking limb can't withstand the force being applied to it anyways. Furthermore, the debate is on a specific piece of structure that is on the line. Everything else is along that line too, and is a separate issue.

"Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." - Baleia

Posted

Never what? The engine of the technique is important, but sometimes you need to think about the tires, too.

"Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." - Baleia

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...