Discerning Knowledge

[sensei8]

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc...After this, therefore because of this...maybe?!

Edited April 28, 2012 by sensei8

[Zaine]

I don't see where the Post Hoc fallacy is being committed.

[sensei8]

I don't see where the Post Hoc fallacy is being committed.

As you can see in my most recent post above, I've added "maybe?!"

[Zaine]

Ah, no I don't think it's being committed here. I do have some experience being a student of philosophy and already passing the logic requirements for my major.

As a little non sequitur, the post hoc fallacy, which you wrote out correctly for modern terms, should actually real post hoc ergo propter huius. I'm a Latin nerd, what can I say.

[sensei8]

It's possible that we can say that we agree that we disagree on what wisdom, knowledge, and experience are in the proposed content/context of the topic/thread.

[Zaine]

That seems fair to me.

[sensei8]

That seems fair to me.

You offered up some solid arguments. I respect that!!

[Zaine]

Nothing like a healthy debate.

[sensei8]

Nothing like a healthy debate.

I agree. We shall re-visit this healthy debate.