three60roundhouse Posted August 18, 2002 Share Posted August 18, 2002 [color=indigo]One in every 2.5 million sets of twins is born with both babies attatched at the head. These pairs usually have seperate brains, which would seem to make seperation possible, however some of the blood vessels pass each other and might be in danger during very high-risk surgery. Many of the pairs joined at the head will never do things such as sit up or stand up unless seperated. However, these surgeries are extremely risky and expensive, and the money could be used for treating other patients. If performed sucessfully, these surgeries could mean scientific breakthroughs in pediatric surgery and more hope for pairs doctors never thought could be seperated. What do you think: try surgery and risk death or use money in more "sure cures"? http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/18/national/18TWIN.html[/color] 1st dan Tae Kwon DoYellow Belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu16 Years OldGirls kick butt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeaF Posted August 18, 2002 Share Posted August 18, 2002 I live in Canada...free heathcare so I say let the government pay to try to give these people a normal life. Could you imagine living life with someone attached to your head, so I believe there is no choice, and as for a cure I think it would be easier , quicker, and less expensive to just perfect the opertations required to separate the babies rather then trying to come up with a cure Goju Ryu Karate-do and Okinawan Kobudo, 17 Years Old 1st kyu Brown Belt in in Goju Ryu Karate-do, & Shodan in Okinawan KobudoGiven enough time, any man may master the physical. With enough knowledge, any man may become wise. It is the true warrior who can master both....and surpass the result.I AM CANADIAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRo Posted August 19, 2002 Share Posted August 19, 2002 dont most of these twins die soon after birth? there was a case in england where a mother didnt want her conjoined twins seperated for religious reasons. the thing was that if they were seperated one of them had abit more of a chance of living. a court made the seperation happen for the sake of the child and in the end both babies died. what do you think they should have done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeaF Posted August 19, 2002 Share Posted August 19, 2002 well I mean what could they have done? I don't think leaving them together is an option... I suppose they could have forced the operation at birth if that was not done, perhaps the sooner the operation is done the better chance they have for life Goju Ryu Karate-do and Okinawan Kobudo, 17 Years Old 1st kyu Brown Belt in in Goju Ryu Karate-do, & Shodan in Okinawan KobudoGiven enough time, any man may master the physical. With enough knowledge, any man may become wise. It is the true warrior who can master both....and surpass the result.I AM CANADIAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts