Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

differenses in MMA and pankration


Recommended Posts

I watched some "modern pankration" in a tournament this year. Dunno whether it was just the fighters themselves but I can't say I was overly impressed as it just looked like a poorer version of what most mma schools do.

imo its cause simple there is not MMA style

its just an athlete that already does at least 2 MAs and he is especially good at first of the arts he learnt and he fights with other no-relation athlete in just common rules where the pankration is a rounded thingy that trains you on its sub-arts on its own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
I think MMA today is more refined, just from the evolution of the style over the last 20 plus years.

Pankration developed for a long time in ancient times, we've had 20 years. i'll bet they were more refined then than you imagine.

You are probably right. I may have misled; I wasn't trying to make ancient Pankration appear to be a rudimentary style or anything like that. I just think that with today's training methods for both fighting and supplemental health, such as cardio and strength, that it is likely more refined as a style now. Just my thoughts, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ancient greek boxing was like "upper-muay thai" they had "semi-contant" leather gloves (i always confuse contant and semi contact so in case i dont say the correct i mean the mini gloves not the boxing) and ANY kind of hand strike were allowed except finger to eye attacks

In pankration it is stated by history stuff it was a combo in boxing and wrestling but it is also stated it had NO rules (even eye finger hits), so i think it is safe to assume for the use of legs and below waist holds, it was practically "get him how ever u want" so that was my point in comparison

The pankration now HAS rules but very limited, but so is MMA.

My point is MMA is more interesting.-Why? cause its not one discipline , each player is good at different things and specialises in them while he is good at other stuff too, where in pankration which is ONE discipline i could say fighters are trained to both things ,grapple and strike, so it is very balanced=boring

just wanted to check to other people views in differense not to say which is better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...