explosive_power Posted April 21, 2010 Posted April 21, 2010 I noticed the very big difference between the two is stance.Shotokan karateka's have a wide stance when sparringWhile kyokushin karateka's stand in a shorter stance while sparringcan anyone explain why this is so?
benjamin Posted April 21, 2010 Posted April 21, 2010 This will be because, invariably, the different styles were coined by different people. And the styles mimic the styles of their creator.Although you'll find that different associations, and even different clubs within the association favour slightly different stances.The stances at my club are considerably longer than the stances of other local clubs in our association. Depends on the teacher too. .
Toptomcat Posted April 21, 2010 Posted April 21, 2010 The core difference between the two from which all others, including stances, flow, is their method of sparring. Shotokan sparring is fundamentally a martial game of tag- the two participants compete to tap the other in a designated target area. When a point is achieved, they stop and restart. Kyokushin sparring is fundamentally a stand-up fight with restrictions- the two participants compete to knock the other man out or knock him down, throwing techniques continuously. It leads to pretty huge differences in technique and philosophy.
Soheir Posted April 21, 2010 Posted April 21, 2010 (edited) The fighting style is different so of course the stance is different too. Edited December 19, 2010 by Soheir “One reason so few of us achieve what we truly want is that we never direct our focus; we never concentrate our power. Most people dabble their way through life, never deciding to master anything in particular.” -Anthony Robbins
ps1 Posted April 21, 2010 Posted April 21, 2010 The stance difference is really just a manifestation of the differences in training. Kyokushin is knockdown karate fighting while shotokan is not. They train differently and, therefore, have different habits. "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenius."
Kuma Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 The stance difference is really just a manifestation of the differences in training. Kyokushin is knockdown karate fighting while shotokan is not. They train differently and, therefore, have different habits.Exactly. Kyokushin also has elements of Goju Ryu in it, which favor shorter stances than the long deep stances you see in Shotokan.
Sheephead Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 The stance difference is really just a manifestation of the differences in training. Kyokushin is knockdown karate fighting while shotokan is not. They train differently and, therefore, have different habits.Exactly. Kyokushin also has elements of Goju Ryu in it, which favor shorter stances than the long deep stances you see in Shotokan.Since Kyokushin's foundation is in both Goju and Shotokan I don't think you can say either is responsible for stance depth/length. And back in the days before point sparring, Shotokan (before Yoshitaka Funakoshis influence I guess) had very narrow stances compared to modern Shotokan.
jsteczko Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Oyama, the creator of Kyokushin was a student of Shotokan creator - Gichin Funakoshi. Yet their styles are not the same. Why? Oyama had a vision, where he crated his own style and where people were training sparring. There is not much kumite in Shotokan clubs. Of course very much depends on the teacher. There are Shotokan clubs where people train kumite, with that little skin-touch which is somehow useless on the street (are you going to use skin-touch strikes when someone attacks you?). I trained before in such club, but I switched to another Shotokan club. There, people are not training kumite but they focus on bunkai, breating, deeper stances and their style is not a sport. They call it budo (the way of the warrior). This means they are training something that you cannot use too much on sport events. You train to really damage your opponent. As you see, two shotokan clubs but different types of training. This is because one sensei thinks one thing is better, another sensei things something else is better. Oyama wanted a style where you could train sparring but still hit hard and be tough. And he did it. I do not know much differences there are between kyokushin clubs but I would gladly try out kyokushin some day. When you will be a black belt you will be able to create your own style as well. Greetings John SteczkoJohn The Burn Belly Fat Guy
Blade96 Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I noticed the very big difference between the two is stance.Shotokan karateka's have a wide stance when sparringWhile kyokushin karateka's stand in a shorter stance while sparringcan anyone explain why this is so?Hoi! Our stance isnt that wide lol You must mean like in zenkutsu dachi stance when moving forward for example oi/gyaku zuki etc in which stance is more the long wide low stance you're describing. But generally ours kumite stance is about shoulder width. Why? Because one needs to be able to lift our front leg up off the floor comfortably and quickly (as for say mae geri keage/kekomi, , yoko geri keage/kekomi, and so on)If our stances was too wide or too narrow than about shoulder width this would either be impossible or just very hard to execute.There - my 2 cents for this morning Some people regard discipline as a chore. For me it is a kind of order that sets me free to fly.You don't have to blow out someone else's candle in order to let your own flame shine.
explosive_power Posted April 22, 2010 Author Posted April 22, 2010 I noticed the very big difference between the two is stance.Shotokan karateka's have a wide stance when sparringWhile kyokushin karateka's stand in a shorter stance while sparringcan anyone explain why this is so?Hoi! Our stance isnt that wide lol You must mean like in zenkutsu dachi stance when moving forward for example oi/gyaku zuki etc in which stance is more the long wide low stance you're describing. But generally ours kumite stance is about shoulder width. Why? Because one needs to be able to lift our front leg up off the floor comfortably and quickly (as for say mae geri keage/kekomi, , yoko geri keage/kekomi, and so on)If our stances was too wide or too narrow than about shoulder width this would either be impossible or just very hard to execute.There - my 2 cents for this morning what I meant was compared to kyokushin,shotokan has the wider stance,and maybe because a wider stance means more power.and is good for such techniques as the gyaku tsuki.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now