Throwdown0850 Posted January 8, 2010 Posted January 8, 2010 http://217.79.182.227/intranet.ijf.org/ijf_video.php?show=20&size=mediumwhat it is saying is you pretty much cant grab below the waist anymore in tourneys, so no double leg or single leg? yikes... me personally, im just ready to quit and go full BJJ.. You must become more than just a man in the mind of your opponent. -Henri Ducard
glockmeister Posted January 8, 2010 Posted January 8, 2010 Judo is getting silly with all of it's rules. they take a lot of fun out of the sport. "You know the best thing about pain? It let's you know you're not dead yet!"http://geshmacheyid.forumotion.com/f14-self-defense
tallgeese Posted January 8, 2010 Posted January 8, 2010 I think (empahsis on think) what they are doing is trying to preserve the sport a unique identity. They want to keep if from starting to look like wrestling, BJJ, no gi, ect. With the big influx of mma themes and ideas, there is alot of blurring of different arts, espicially grappling ones. I think they just want judo to look like judo in competition.I'm not saying this the the best way to make it effective or integrate it into a comprehensive defensive plan. It's just a way to keep the art seperate from all others, at least in competitive arenas.I can understand it from a sport aspect. Schools will likely go on teaching all the tactics anyway from an art perspective. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
Throwdown0850 Posted January 9, 2010 Author Posted January 9, 2010 I think (empahsis on think) what they are doing is trying to preserve the sport a unique identity. They want to keep if from starting to look like wrestling, BJJ, no gi, ect. With the big influx of mma themes and ideas, there is alot of blurring of different arts, espicially grappling ones. I think they just want judo to look like judo in competition.I'm not saying this the the best way to make it effective or integrate it into a comprehensive defensive plan. It's just a way to keep the art seperate from all others, at least in competitive arenas.I can understand it from a sport aspect. Schools will likely go on teaching all the tactics anyway from an art perspective.good post, my thoughts exactly. You must become more than just a man in the mind of your opponent. -Henri Ducard
wildman1717 Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 From what I'm instructed you can still do the morote gari and kata gurumas but the can't be the first attack. It can be used as a follow attack like shoulder throw into kata guruma.
Throwdown0850 Posted January 20, 2010 Author Posted January 20, 2010 From what I'm instructed you can still do the morote gari and kata gurumas but the can't be the first attack. It can be used as a follow attack like shoulder throw into kata guruma.see that's what I was thinking too, I didn't think a follow attack would be a problem, I just cant see taking them out of tourneys all together?? Good Post You must become more than just a man in the mind of your opponent. -Henri Ducard
wildman1717 Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 I'm still not a fan of the rule changes, and I wish the IJF would stop making these stupid changes.
Toptomcat Posted January 25, 2010 Posted January 25, 2010 From what I'm instructed you can still do the morote gari and kata gurumas but the can't be the first attack. It can be used as a follow attack like shoulder throw into kata guruma.see that's what I was thinking too, I didn't think a follow attack would be a problem, I just cant see taking them out of tourneys all together?? Good Post The problem is that the first infraction results in hansoku-make, automatic disqualification...so unless you trust the referee to be completely infalliable- to recognize that your leg takedown was, in fact, part of a combination the first time, every time- you're putting yourself at unacceptable risk of being DQed just by attempting a leg throw. No high-level competitor would take such a risk. It's a way to ban the techniques without banning them.
ps1 Posted February 17, 2010 Posted February 17, 2010 I think this sport already exists. It's called Greko Roman Wrestling!!!!This is a mistake on the part of Judo (Olympic). They're really losing focus on what made the art great. "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenius."
Toptomcat Posted February 18, 2010 Posted February 18, 2010 The judo community seems to be genuinely split on the rule, and it's a weird split. There aren't many people in the middle ground- there are people who absolutely cannot understand why the IJF would make a technique that's in Kano's kata and isn't a safety issue a first-offense hansoku-make, and people who can't comprehend what the fuss is about and think the first group are carrying on about nothing. Some low-level tournaments have refused to implement the new rules.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now