Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Front kick (Maegeri)


Bastich

Recommended Posts

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't disagree with that. And to be honest I don't like the argument to begin with, but some of the Shihans in my system would argue that any kick to the front is a "front kick", or similarly, any kick to the side is a "side kick"

Now the classic example that gets used is a mae geri performed not straight ahead, but rather to the side of the body. It is argued that such a kick should be classified as a "side kick," a notion that has some merit.

Myself, on the other hand, I'd rather keep it simple and not overly confuse the concept. A mae geri is a front kick, a yoko geri is a side kick, a mawashi geri is a round kick, etc. Again, don't particularly agree or like the argument myself, but I just thought I'd share the thought process there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with that. And to be honest I don't like the argument to begin with, but some of the Shihans in my system would argue that any kick to the front is a "front kick", or similarly, any kick to the side is a "side kick"

Now the classic example that gets used is a mae geri performed not straight ahead, but rather to the side of the body. It is argued that such a kick should be classified as a "side kick," a notion that has some merit.

Myself, on the other hand, I'd rather keep it simple and not overly confuse the concept. A mae geri is a front kick, a yoko geri is a side kick, a mawashi geri is a round kick, etc. Again, don't particularly agree or like the argument myself, but I just thought I'd share the thought process there.

How would you refer to a kick executed to the side but done with the ball of foot and toes upward?

WNM

"A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksy


https://www.banksy.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with that. And to be honest I don't like the argument to begin with, but some of the Shihans in my system would argue that any kick to the front is a "front kick", or similarly, any kick to the side is a "side kick"

Now the classic example that gets used is a mae geri performed not straight ahead, but rather to the side of the body. It is argued that such a kick should be classified as a "side kick," a notion that has some merit.

Myself, on the other hand, I'd rather keep it simple and not overly confuse the concept. A mae geri is a front kick, a yoko geri is a side kick, a mawashi geri is a round kick, etc. Again, don't particularly agree or like the argument myself, but I just thought I'd share the thought process there.

How would you refer to a kick executed to the side but done with the ball of foot and toes upward?

WNM

That would be the classic example I referred to (classic in the sense that it's what the Shihans always use to demonstrate the point), a mae geri performed not straight ahead, but off to the side of the body where a yoko geri is normally done. At the conceptual level something like that is referred to as a "side kick" because it is done to the side.

Now me, I'd just as soon keep the call the kicks what they are traditionally labeled. I'm of the opinion that overly convoluting the names of the techniques is unnecessary. It's just one school of thought on the matter.

Edited by rogue2257
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I guess at the end of the day, if he/she has enough depth of knowledge the made up stuff should be sound.

As far as kicks to the side (in Maegeri foot position) they are not making it up, it is a Yoko geri.

In this JKF Video of Pinan Yondan you will see that the kick at 0:27 is labelled as Yoko geri.

It is defined as such because of its directionality, rather than foot position.

WNM

"A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksy


https://www.banksy.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's plenty of merit to the argument. If I'm the head of my own school, realistically, I can call the techniques whatever I want to.

If I think that a jumping double front kick should really be called the Flying Spaghetti Kick, who can say that I'm wrong?

My point is, you can call the kick whatever you like. A kick is a kick is a kick. When it comes down to it, how important is classifying it and debating it?

For the sake of trying to avoid too many headaches from the subject, I'm at the point where I'd just as soon keep the front kick as "that one you do to the front where you hit with the ball of the foot," and the side kick as "that one where you stomp out to the side of the body."

I don't disagree with the argument, by any means, but I'd rather just do the kick than sit around debating what it should be called. But that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...