cathal Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 Hey there,So I was poking around the net and found a self defence video (I'll try to find it...can't seem to remember the URL) where the instructor was demonstrating how to get out of a rear bear hug. After breaking free, she used a finger lock to get her demo down onto his knees. Then she demonstrated how to break his neck.Not only was I horrified but I was desperately trying to figure out why someone would teach this without speaking to the legal ramifications, but she spoke about breaking the neck as casually as she did the finger lock. When you learned, or if you teach, do you talk about your local and national laws regarding self defence?Thanks .The best victory is when the opponent surrendersof its own accord before there are any actualhostilities...It is best to win without fighting.- Sun-tzu
JusticeZero Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 I tend to see that type of technique as 'probably ineffective'. It is a structural attack on one of the most resilient and reinforced pieces of anatomy on the human body, and not something that gets tested very often.I try to push a loop that at every second step asks 'Can I run away now?' so that students won't cross the line into assault; I also treat techniques as ways to move an attacker or degrade their ability to persue, rather than 'how much can I hurt them?' If it comes down to it, I want them to be able to say something like "I hit him that hard so I could get him out of the way to RUN OUT THE DOOR" rather than try to justify some Mortal Kombat style special finishing move in a court to a peeved hotshot lawyer brother-in-law of the attacker. "Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." - Baleia
sensei8 Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 When you learned, or if you teach, do you talk about your local and national laws regarding self defence?Everyday...all day...all of the time! To do otherwise, would be irresponsible of me. Now, what the student decides to do after I've supplied the necessary info, well, then that's up to them. For me, I will do whatever is necessary to protect my family, my loved ones, and myself. After that, I just hope the judge will see it my way.My style, Shindokan, doesn't cover the Neck Break technique...boy...I feel cheated! **Proof is on the floor!!!
tallgeese Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 I'm with Justice on this one. The neck break, while theoretically possible from some angles and twists, is more than likely less than effective. It'd be pretty hard to pull of in the mess of an altercation. Impossible, probably not, but there are better ways to kill people.To the legal ramifications, yes, you'd better be discussing use of force. It important to keeping you and your people out of trouble.That being said, you should also be training highly damaging tactics and possibly life threatening ones in the same manner as the rest. It's a response to a threat, that's all. Anything else will set one up for mental failure when it comes time to apply the movement. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
The BB of C Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 I always believed breaking a neck is excessive. But I don't care too much about legal ramifications about defending myself. I try to train my instincts to stay attacking until I see the enemy stop moving entirely because if I just use a Dis-abler take-down and run away, or create space and flee, then I'm giving him an opportunity to draw a weapon.
bushido_man96 Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 To discuss a move like a neck break without discussing the legal ramifications of using such a technique is not a good idea, in my opinion. If one is to even consider jumping to a technique like that, the other person better have a weapon or something in hand. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
sensei8 Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 (edited) To discuss a move like a neck break without discussing the legal ramifications of using such a technique is not a good idea, in my opinion. If one is to even consider jumping to a technique like that, the other person better have a weapon or something in hand.More than likely, if a martial artist breaks someones neck, a judge would throw the martial artist under the jail for quite awhile. Why? Because there are so many other non-fatal techniques availible to a martial artist. The I don't hit, but, it hits all by itself excuse won't impress any judge in any court of law. We, martial artists are suppose to be in control, but, breaking a neck is being way out of control, imho. Edited September 16, 2009 by sensei8 **Proof is on the floor!!!
cathal Posted September 16, 2009 Author Posted September 16, 2009 Ah, found it. Here is the link: http://video.aol.co.uk/video-detail/womens-self-defense-neck-break/2285485387 .The best victory is when the opponent surrendersof its own accord before there are any actualhostilities...It is best to win without fighting.- Sun-tzu
sensei8 Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Ah, found it. Here is the link: http://video.aol.co.uk/video-detail/womens-self-defense-neck-break/2285485387She's seen one to many movies! Yes, she warns against this move, unless it's life/death, but, wow, legal issue are ignored. Again, I don't see this as an effective solution/technique because the attacker is so compliant in the demo. How do we know the blow on the back of the hand will even work for every attacker? How do we know that the finger manipulation will even work for every attacker? How do we know if the attacker will react at each movement? How do we know that the attacker is going to stay down and/or stay in place long enough for 'me' to apply/execute the open the neck/neck break?In this next paragraph, remember, I'm playing the attacker.Smack me on the back of my hand, if I'm the attacker, it's on like donkey kong, or I'm laughing at you. Twist my fingers, if I'm the attacker, and 'your' grip isn't firm, it's on like donkey kong, or I'm still laughing at you. Let go of my hand, if I'm the attacker, then I'm getting up while creating distance while I go to plan 'B' or something, as I'm still laughing at you. Twist my neck, if I'm the attacker, and the only thing you do is adjust my neck like a chiropractor, then, I'm going to thank you, and then it's on like donkey kong, or I'm going to be rolling on the floor laughing at you. Now, use sensible and effective techniques, then, I, as the attacker, am not going to be laughing, no, I'm going to be hurting.Thanks for the video cathal! **Proof is on the floor!!!
tallgeese Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Ok, less then impressive in my opinion as well. The joints not immobilized and the attacker is free to move and adjust. Don't see it happening from here.On a different point, I don't think that just because you use something along the line of this that might actually work it means that you're out of control or going to jail. It just means that deadly force was called for and that you applied it. If those two hold true, it's going to be hard for you to do jail time. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now