Gordon Ramsey Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 If taking down the big guy works then keep doing itBashing little people does nothing You're all wonderful people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryanryu Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 It makes sense the reasons to attack the frontman, but my school always advised going after the weakest opponent first. That way you can take them out or control them, somehow keeping them in between you and the main group, similar to a human shield. I always saw it as a delaying tactic to buy you time and an escape route. After all isn't running the wisest thing to do in a gang fight? “Studying karate nowadays is like walking in the dark without a lantern.” Chojun Miyagi (attributed)https://www.lanterndojo.com/https://karatenobody.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusticeZero Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 It's similar to my explanation of dealing with being held by someone with a weapon - "The first thing you need to do is to get their mind out of their trigger finger/knife and into the back of their head. Otherwise you won't have the time or space to act." With a group, you have to get their minds out of the group and into their individual heads - against a mob of people, you can't realistically win, but against a group of thinking, self-aware individuals, you have a bit of hope. Destroying the leader is supposed to shock them out of the group and back into their own heads. "Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." - Baleia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 It makes sense the reasons to attack the frontman, but my school always advised going after the weakest opponent first. That way you can take them out or control them, somehow keeping them in between you and the main group, similar to a human shield. I always saw it as a delaying tactic to buy you time and an escape route. After all isn't running the wisest thing to do in a gang fight?That's reasonable, if the weakest person is close enough to get to. Most likely, they are in the back, or flanked by a few protectors. So, you kind of have to take what's given you. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei8 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 (edited) Going for the biggest guy is smart, but, risky. Why? If you don't take the big guy out then you'll NOW have a very mad big guy; bad combination! Go for it, but you better take care of it right then and there...or run...fast! ryanryu: It makes sense the reasons to attack the frontman, but my school always advised going after the weakest opponent first. That way you can take them out or control them, somehow keeping them in between you and the main group, similar to a human shield. I always saw it as a delaying tactic to buy you time and an escape route. After all isn't running the wisest thing to do in a gang fight? I like that plan as well. Edited August 18, 2009 by sensei8 **Proof is on the floor!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now