ZakariRu Posted July 28, 2002 Share Posted July 28, 2002 shotokan has no throws??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!? WTF! Tekki shodan, nidan, and sandan?? Gojushihosho and dai. Heian shodan even has a huge take down in it.... Actually when i think about it there is a throw in almost ever single kata..... Shotokan has alot of throws and takedowns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZakariRu Posted July 28, 2002 Share Posted July 28, 2002 and there were two styles of karate around before funakoshi went to japan. Goju and shorin. O-Sensei was also the first person to take karate to japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G95champ Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 I got Funakoshi's books on the shelf above me and I can show you pages of throws. Shotokan has tons of them. In face befroe WWII it had a lot more. Shotokan was VERY close to Judo. Howver because the Japanese militray wanted a fighting sytem to teach the troops many of the throws were taken out and hidden in kata. (General George S. Patton Jr.) "It's the unconquerable soul of man, and not the nature of the weapon he uses, that ensures victory." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikudo-ka Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 I'll quote Funakoshi directly, from memory here - "Throws and locks were practised in my day, and I recommend you practise them as well", or something along those lines. Take a look at Karate-Do Kyohan. The contents can be seen at: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0870111906/reader/4/002-9311003-5640822#reader-link Look under section 5 in the contents - "Throwing Techniques"... You can't get much more "Shotokan" than Funakoshi himself. Anyway, as far as throws in kata, Zakiru is right. Just about any move can become a throw if applied right, the basic lower block combined with a step or turn, for example. As for its popularity, -: is right, I think it's mainly because Funakoshi worked his butt off to make it so. However, he wasn't the first in Japan. Choki Motobu went there before him, but was never as successul there as a teacher. As far as stance height, I took a Goju class, and then signed up for the style. The stances are much higher than Shotokan, and tend to utilize small, circular steps. Only the "Shiko Dachi" (Sumo/Horse/Straddle stance) is really low. I can't think of any pictures I've seen where a Goju man is "out-lowering" a Shotokan man. BTW, what do you Shotokan guys use sanchin/hourglass stance for, seeing as you don't do sanchin kata? I initially thought this stance a defining characteristic of Naha-te style, but I've seen it crop up in enough Shotokan references to know otherwise. Just wondering how it got there? Do you have another kata that uses it? KarateForums.com - Sempai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G95champ Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 The Kata Hangetsu uses that stance. I assume you are talking about the stance with your knees and upper legs together. You step in a half-moon shape. I have saw this refered to as an hourglass stance. I think that is our version of what you are refering to. Funakoshi includes that kata in Karate-Do Kyohan. So check it out and see if we are talking about the same thing. (General George S. Patton Jr.) "It's the unconquerable soul of man, and not the nature of the weapon he uses, that ensures victory." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikudo-ka Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 Yes, it is the same stance. I read up about Hangetsu here: http://www.24fightingchickens.com/shotokan/kata/hangetsu.html Ah Ha. If it IS a southern Chinese form that made its way into Shuri-te, that explains why it's in Shotokan. Naha-te took even more forms from the same southern Chinese styles, hence the greater prevalence of hourglass stance. KarateForums.com - Sempai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZakariRu Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 negative negative negative choki wasnt first. And we use sanchin in hyakuhachiho and nijushiho. Hangetsu and sanchin are different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kensai Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 ZakariRu , I can see that your refer to Funakoshi as O Sensei. This is not his title. He is Sensei. He was never called O sensei by anybody. O Sensei, is commonly the title given to Morihei Ueshiba (creator of Aikido). Sorry about the throws comment. I am wrong. Just looked some up. But throws in Shotokan, or atleast at the club I used to train at, and I was taught by Sensei Ohta, that was trained by Sensei Enoeda 8th Dan, were not taught so to speak. Are they in more of a Bunkai subject? I also have Sensei Nakayama's book and there are no mention of throws even in the techniques section which is pretty huge. Thats not to say that there are'nt any. Any links on Karate throws would be very mush appreciated. (of any style) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZakariRu Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 lol. O-Sensei is a merely a title for the founder of a style. have you ever studied japanese? there are several throws in karatedo kyohan and the best karate series. Ill check dynamic karate (nakayamas big boook) and get back to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobias_Reece Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 From what I have heard from many different instructors etc. is that Nakayama's books are very (quote unquote) simple in terms of bunkai - the fact that they don't show many throws, locks etc. But then again, some people may think striking is enough. "You Are Never Given A Dream Without Also Being Given The Power To Make It True. You May Have To Work For It, However"Principal Kobudo Instructor & OwnerWest Yorkshire Kobudo Academy2nd Kyu (Matayoshi Okinawan Kobudo, IOKA UK) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts