Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I'd say that sounds about right. JJ was the combat art of Japan; Karate has been cited as a civilian self-defense system.

This made me wonder what were the first jiu jitsu texts written and by who ? Any excellent jiu jitsu books worth recommending ? :karate:

How did Jiu Jitsu become a combat martial art and how did karate become a civilian martial art ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Wally Jay's and George Kirby's stuff are good starting points. However, Japanese Jiu-Jitsu (JJJ) has a VERY differnt flavor from Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ). The first Jiu-Jitsu book I remember reading was Bruce Tegner's back around 1960 :D

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As John mentions, you have to first understand that Jujutsu today takes many forms (as well as spellings... Jiu-jutsu, Ju-jitsu etc) but ultimately it originated in Japan, was a battlefield art in its early days and was modified according to times.

This is a great essay that goes along way to explain the history behind the art.

You will also get part answer to your question, in that it details that among the first references to these arts were the "Nihon Shoki" (Japan Chronicles), and "Kojiki" (Ancient Records).

https://www.shinyokai.com/Essays_Whatisjujutsu.htm

If it's the real deal you are after (IE Koryu), this site is the most respected in terms of its accuracy. And they have a great book store as well.

https://www.koryu.com/index.html

If its the modern stuff you are after, I guess amazon is your friend?

"A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksy


https://www.banksy.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as far as where karate and Jujutsu became joined at the hip, well (apart from Wado-Ryu) they didn't really imo, and don't need to be.

Okinawan Karate has an equally rich heritage to that of Japanese Jujtsu. Its indigenous Todi/wrestling attests to this.

Arguably they are two tributaries feeding into the same river that is modern karate, but in truth they are very different I think.

"A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksy


https://www.banksy.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first texts and techniques are mostly from the Edo period in Japan (1600's-1860's). As the country was united under the tokugawa shogunate during the time, many samurai found the time to create systems from the techniques they had gathered (as they no longer had a job fighting wars).

Most early martial arts schools have a weapons based focus reflecting their wartime influence, but as martial arts became more tailored to non warfare based situations jujutsu (originally referred to 'yawara' or 'soft') began to become emphasized. However most koryu schools are not purely jujutsu based but retain weapon based training.

As such I think it could be argued that jujutsu wasn't meant much for the battlefield either and only as a last resort. As for karate, owning swords was banned and it was practiced among the general populace as a folk style of fighting. Thus it utilized what were at the time everyday implements for weapons and focused on striking as opposed to grappling as you wouldn't be fighting armored foes.

Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.


~Theodore Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...