tallgeese Posted December 24, 2008 Posted December 24, 2008 Sure, but there are plenty of arts out there that aren't "traditional" in their mold. And their puropses are pretty well defined and have plenty of purpose behind them.It's simply a different approach, certainly no less valid. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
Wa-No-Michi Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Sure, but there are plenty of arts out there that aren't "traditional" in their mold. And their puropses are pretty well defined and have plenty of purpose behind them.It's simply a different approach, certainly no less valid.Agreed, but we are talking about a qualification within traditional karate aren't we? Of course this is not the only way to measure this, but its the way it tends to be done in Trad Karate Circles. Otherwise, why don't we just have a wrestle off? "A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksyhttps://www.banksy.co.uk
tallgeese Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Not necissarily. The black belt rank holds meaning both in trad circles and non-trad ones. It's a measure of something in both. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
Wa-No-Michi Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Not necissarily. The black belt rank holds meaning both in trad circles and non-trad ones. It's a measure of something in both.Personally therefore, I cant see the value in hanging on to traditions such as "Belt" rankings if your art is not traditional.Or do you guys wanna have your cake and eat it as well.lol "A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksyhttps://www.banksy.co.uk
tallgeese Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Pretty much, yeah It is nice to have some sort of reference point on a student's development. It's also nice to have some connection to the root of what we're doing.It's not about abandoning everything that came before. It's a matter of streamlining it into the most efficient method possible. Some touchstone of where the orgin isn't bad. Hence, the use of belts as a referance point, even if we rarely wear them.Even at that I don't rank everyone I train or train with. There are guys that just do mma stuff with me. That's their thing, they have no interest in combatives beyond that. Therefore, I don't rank them. The ones who want the complete system, they're the ones who get ranked. So far, this has worked out fine for all parites invovlved. http://alphajiujitsu.com/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJhRVuwbm__LwXPvFMReMww
bushido_man96 Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 In SD /UFC etc., but if you want to study a trad ma you should do it the trad ma way imo (don't matter of you (tg) think its right or wrong).Bunkai is a process that you can only understand if you understand kata.Otherwise everything you are doing is "waza" technique, which is empty without true movement/purpose. If "Bunkai" is to be described as soley interpretations that relate to the breakdown/application of kata movements, then I guess it is a sole component of Karate.However, I think its possible to train with applications in scenarios, without the template of a kata/form being present. I think this is what tallgeese is referring to. Perhaps it isn't Karate, but it is Martial Art. So, at some point, we're just splitting hairs. You can still achieve the same goals, but by taking different paths. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
bushido_man96 Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Not necissarily. The black belt rank holds meaning both in trad circles and non-trad ones. It's a measure of something in both.Personally therefore, I cant see the value in hanging on to traditions such as "Belt" rankings if your art is not traditional.Or do you guys wanna have your cake and eat it as well.lolWhat does it matter if an art is "traditional" or not? As long as it is effective, I feel that is the main measuring point.Ooh, ooh, I just got an idea for another thread..... https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
bushido_man96 Posted December 25, 2008 Posted December 25, 2008 Botching a Kata, ie getting two moves into and forgetting it, is an instant fail in my group. Even if you restart it 30 seconds later and do it 100% you will still fail.I can see where this does have merit in tests, especially when a black belt is expected to be able to recall curriculum in a class for any lower ranked student that might be asking for help. A black belt will appear more professional if he doesn't have to ask someone else to help him help someone remember a form. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
NightOwl Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 I think this can really depend on the style, and many times on what individual schools are looking for. Personally though I would look for a comprehensive knowledge of the curriculum and the ability to effectively utilize such knowledge in an applied setting. Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.~Theodore Roosevelt
Wa-No-Michi Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 However, I think its possible to train with applications in scenarios, without the template of a kata/form being present. I think this is what tallgeese is referring to. Perhaps it isn't Karate, but it is Martial Art. So, at some point, we're just splitting hairs. You can still achieve the same goals, but by taking different paths.Agreed. "A lot of people never use their initiative.... because no-one told them to" - Banksyhttps://www.banksy.co.uk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now