bushido_man96 Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 I was reading an article in BBMag by Bill Wallace this morning. He was discussing self-defense and reality-based fighting. Towards the end of the article, he makes a statement saying that reality-based fighting represents the roots of the Martial Arts.I know that it is just Wallace's opinion, and know one can really say that he is right, but I think that he makes a very good point.Initially, the Martial Arts were not about stylization and competition. They were about simplicity and efficiency in war. On the battlefield, things had to be as quick as possible. I know that the Martial Arts have come a very long way in its evolution. However, it always seems to go full-circle, back to keeping it simple in times of crises.What do you all think? https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackxpress Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 My sensei would agree. He just preached us a sermon on that very subject last Wed. night. He said that he wouldn't discourage us from taking part in tournament competition but that he, personally, doesn't have much use for it. He believes our training should be oriented toward real world self defense which, as he puts it, was the original purpose of karate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username8517 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 I would agree with it and I know my instructor would as well. Like blackxpress, my sensei tells everyone that joins that he wouldn't discourage them from doing tournaments and competitions, but a lot of the moves and techniques he shows are not allowed in competition.But yes, martial arts were originally created for fighting. However, one must also be aware that there are some junk Reality Based Self-Defense instructors out there just as there are with any TMA. A particular style, or lack there of, does not signify any guarantee to surviving on the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted March 26, 2007 Author Share Posted March 26, 2007 I would agree with it and I know my instructor would as well. Like blackxpress, my sensei tells everyone that joins that he wouldn't discourage them from doing tournaments and competitions, but a lot of the moves and techniques he shows are not allowed in competition.I think we all know where "Superfoot" stands from a competition stand-point. I feel that competition isn't a bad thing. I think that a good Martial Artist can still train for both competition and self-defense.But yes, martial arts were originally created for fighting. However, one must also be aware that there are some junk Reality Based Self-Defense instructors out there just as there are with any TMA. A particular style, or lack there of, does not signify any guarantee to surviving on the streets.You make a good point here, bearich. I don't think you have to seek out a RBSD instructor to get that kind of training. I don't think anyone would consider Wallace an RBSD instructor, but he still teaches some reality-based views on fighting. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bullock Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 I would have to say I agree whole heartedly with Mr. Wallace's comments.As a matter of fact he said very similar things in his seminar he did in Columbus, Kansas a few weekends ago.The martial arts can be practiced for a variety of reasons including health, fitness, hobby, sport and so on. But the bottom line is that they were intended for warfare and fighting. A warrior is not just a scholar, he is not just supposed to be in shape, he "should" be trained to protect, fight, and kill if need be. James Bullockhttps://www.combativesciences.comhttp://www.myspace.com/warrior_athleticshttp://combative-sciences.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted March 26, 2007 Author Share Posted March 26, 2007 I would have to say I agree whole heartedly with Mr. Wallace's comments.As a matter of fact he said very similar things in his seminar he did in Columbus, Kansas a few weekends ago.The martial arts can be practiced for a variety of reasons including health, fitness, hobby, sport and so on. But the bottom line is that they were intended for warfare and fighting. A warrior is not just a scholar, he is not just supposed to be in shape, he "should" be trained to protect, fight, and kill if need be.I agree, James Bullock.So, Wallace actually had a seminar in KANSAS??? I didn't know about it!! That would have been great? Where exactly is Columbus? https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bullock Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 It's about thirty minutes or so away from Pittsburgh. It was great got the usual autograph, pictures and such. He was one of the nicest martial arts stars I have met. It was put on by a guy that is apart of SWAT. It is an organization that has many TKD practitioners. There was an open tournament the day after the seminar. James Bullockhttps://www.combativesciences.comhttp://www.myspace.com/warrior_athleticshttp://combative-sciences.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted March 26, 2007 Author Share Posted March 26, 2007 Very cool. I would drive across the state for that, for sure. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerDude Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 he is not just supposed to be in shape, he "should" be trained to protect, fight, and kill if need be.I don't know that I agree with that. If I wanted to protect myself, I'd carry a pistol. If you think only of hitting, springing, striking or touching the enemy, you will not be able actually to cut him. You must thoroughly research this. - Musashi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushido_man96 Posted March 27, 2007 Author Share Posted March 27, 2007 he is not just supposed to be in shape, he "should" be trained to protect, fight, and kill if need be.I don't know that I agree with that. If I wanted to protect myself, I'd carry a pistol.Well, I think part of reality is being in the know about the weapons that are availble for the time that you live in. Today, conceal and carry is a big thing, and that, in itself, is a bit of reality. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now