Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted

Overall the show was a cool idea with poor scientific execution.

"It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenius."

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Does anyone know of where or if one can buy it for just general viewing pleasure?

I have ninja monkies in my brain and they are using it as a trampaline.

Posted
Does anyone know of where or if one can buy it for just general viewing pleasure?

You might check the National Geographic website, or whatever website they are affiliated with. Many times, they will sell the episodes, for around $25, I think.

Posted

Man I feel dumb for not thinking of that when I posted, my head would float away if it wasn't attached to my neck.

I have ninja monkies in my brain and they are using it as a trampaline.

Posted

The premise of the show was admirable, but they dropped the ball...

1. First of all, its the man not the art.. so comparing the 150 lb Kungfu guy with the 200+ lb boxer, and showing how much more "powerful" a boxer's punch was, is ludicrous..!!

2. You cannot compare punching methods, kicking methods, or anything else unless you have the SAME person perfom each technique.. that way the TECHNIQUE is the variable, not the martial artist..

3. The only thing a comparison of martial artists will show, is that an equally skilled LARGER man will produce MORE impact..

Dave

Posted

i might have seen the show once... but i cant really remember much...

"ok, well i must warn you, im an orange belt on karateforums!"

Posted
The premise of the show was admirable, but they dropped the ball...

1. First of all, its the man not the art.. so comparing the 150 lb Kungfu guy with the 200+ lb boxer, and showing how much more "powerful" a boxer's punch was, is ludicrous..!!

2. You cannot compare punching methods, kicking methods, or anything else unless you have the SAME person perfom each technique.. that way the TECHNIQUE is the variable, not the martial artist..

3. The only thing a comparison of martial artists will show, is that an equally skilled LARGER man will produce MORE impact..

Dave

These are all very good points. You would think that with the show taking a "scientific" approach, that they would have had a "control group" to base some of the measurements off.

Posted

http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/fightscience/videoPreview.html

I don't know if anyone's seen it, but that's the link to the trailer for the shows. Whether the scientific content is accurate or not, there was some pretty impressive displays of force in that sample. There's one bit where one of the bigger guys generates more force using his arms than he does swinging a sledgehammer.

"Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it." ~ Confucius

Posted
There's one bit where one of the bigger guys generates more force using his arms than he does swinging a sledgehammer.

i doubt very much that guy uses a sledgehammer very much in his life and probly doesnt know how to use it very well. if you get a construction worker who knows how to use a hammer and he's a martial artist i tend to think the hammer would generate more force. if not why do we even have sledgehammers to begin with? we would just punch things into place.

When practicing Nunchaku, it is best not to stand under lights....seriously; I have broken more lights that way. :-P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...