DeeBoy Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 I recently trhu 347 punches in 60 sec. all hitting a focus mitt with enough power to slowly move my partner back. the opponent i was up against was throwing punches like you would on a speedball with no force, but still making contact with the focus mitt. my opponent thru more punches than me on this occasion, but many people were dissapointed with the decision to allow the punches as different MA styles have different techniques.As this was for a Guiness world record, do you think people should be striking a pressure plate to achieve a minimum impact range for it to constitute a "real" punch? 'The key to immortality is to live a life worth remembering'
alsey Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 so you were trying to do the most punches in a given time for a world record? i agree, i think using a pressure plate to measure the punch would be a good idea in this case, but you'd still have to decide on how powerful a real punch is. "Gently return to the simple physical sensation of the breath. Then do it again, and again, and again. Somewhere in this process, you will come face-to-face with the sudden and shocking realization that you are completely crazy. Your mind is a shrieking, gibbering madhouse on wheels." - ven. henepola gunaratana
Zorbasan Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 i think in this case, making contact with a pad using your knuckles constituted a punch Now you use head for something other than target.
al.karate Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 I recently trhu 347 punches in 60 sec. all hitting a focus mitt with enough power to slowly move my partner back. the opponent i was up against was throwing punches like you would on a speedball with no force, but still making contact with the focus mitt. my opponent thru more punches than me on this occasion, but many people were dissapointed with the decision to allow the punches as different MA styles have different techniques.As this was for a Guiness world record, do you think people should be striking a pressure plate to achieve a minimum impact range for it to constitute a "real" punch?i agree but before the start you willhave to agree on how hard a real punch is.
bushido_man96 Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 How hard a punch is also has to include what you expect a punch to do. Like a jab--it won't usually knock someone out. A cross can. Or is the prerequisite for a punch just to contact an object with a closed fist? From what postition does the punch have to be initiated? Does it start from the rib, or from an advanced arm base? Does have to travel 12 inches, or just 2?There are just too many variables. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
Jiffy Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 Absoloutly. Punch:–noun 1. a thrusting blow, esp. with the fist. 2. forcefulness, effectiveness, or pungency in content or appeal; power; zest: a letter to voters that needs more punch. –verb (used with object) 3. to give a sharp thrust or blow to, esp. with the fist. As per the above description from the dictionary, a punch is about force. If there is no force, it is not a punch. Tapping something with a closed palm does not constitute a punch. The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.
Zorbasan Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 this is the guiness people tho. Now you use head for something other than target.
kenpo.stylist Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 I think a certain standard would have to set in regard to how much force the pad is struck with, then the standard should be held. There should also be certain guidelines with respect to technique...for example, can a backfist be considered a punch? I can backfist more times that I can throw a decently forceful punch, but I can throw sloppy little tap punches much more quickly than I can backfist...even if there's little power to them.Too many variables...http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=61590I did find ^^^^^ that interesting link ^^^^^ but it didn't list power or technique...perhaps it doesn't matter.
bushido_man96 Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Do you think of a backfist as a thrusting technique, or a snapping/swinging technique? I think it snaps more than thrusts, but that is just my interpretation. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
kenpo.stylist Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 yeah, more of a whipping technique.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now