Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted
This is a really good discussion, everyone. You guys are all very knowledgable about physics. I may have to take notes. There may be enough info here for me to get some college credits!

Well; if you need anything explaining, or need any help with Maths, Chemistry, Biology and Physics, you can always PM Me Bushido! :D :)

Maybe we should set up a thread for those that need help with stuff? :-?

To know the road ahead; ask those coming back... ~ Chinese Proverb



" The ultimate aim of Karate lies not in victory or defeat, but in the perfection of the character of its participants. " ~ Master Funakoshi

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm enjoying the physics discussion above, but I have to say that they are mostly based on Newtonian mechanics, which are outdated (kind of). With something so complex as the human body (and mind), the application of the momentum, power, work, etc., equations is kind of tricky. For example, different body types will have a different optimum power generation strategy. A lean, long-legs body type will probably be able to use pendulum motions more effectively, while a stocky body type might use rotation and vibration better. The same goes for punching and the final rotation of the punch. I would think a long, light-limbed person would benefit more from going full-rotation than a short, heavy-armed person. Of course, there are many combinations of body types and people need to find their optimum trayectory.

Taking into account where you are starting from is called "sensistivity to initial conditions", a characteristic of complex systems, studied by non-linear physics ( the more cutting-edge stuff taught at universities nowadays). The good thing about well-developed traditional MA systems is that they have enough collective experience/wisdom in them to accomodate most combinations of characteristics. In a sense, their historical depth makes them well-suited to deal with the complexity of human body characteristics in a population.

Posted

this is somewhat of a controversial subject... i was always taught to strike through the target, but i've seen some amazing things done at full extension as well. for now, i strike through the target. if something else works better 20 years down the road, i may do that instead.

"On Ko Chi Shin"

Posted
I'm enjoying the physics discussion above, but I have to say that they are mostly based on Newtonian mechanics, which are outdated (kind of). With something so complex as the human body (and mind), the application of the momentum, power, work, etc., equations is kind of tricky. For example, different body types will have a different optimum power generation strategy. A lean, long-legs body type will probably be able to use pendulum motions more effectively, while a stocky body type might use rotation and vibration better. The same goes for punching and the final rotation of the punch. I would think a long, light-limbed person would benefit more from going full-rotation than a short, heavy-armed person. Of course, there are many combinations of body types and people need to find their optimum trayectory.

Taking into account where you are starting from is called "sensistivity to initial conditions", a characteristic of complex systems, studied by non-linear physics ( the more cutting-edge stuff taught at universities nowadays). The good thing about well-developed traditional MA systems is that they have enough collective experience/wisdom in them to accomodate most combinations of characteristics. In a sense, their historical depth makes them well-suited to deal with the complexity of human body characteristics in a population.

newtonian mechanics has been shown to be incorrect, but when you're dealing with a macroscopic system with everyday energies, newtonian mechanics (or its equivalent, hamiltonian mechanics) is still used and gives accurate results.

when you have a non-linear problem, the standard approach is to approximate it with a linear one, which is what i did in a simple form in my previous posts. if that doesn't work, then you have to get into the non-linear math, but in this case the linear approximation works very well.

but like i said, all the physics can really tell you is that to transmit as much energy into the target as possible, you have to hit the target when the strike has maximum speed, and the strike has maximum speed before full extention. everything else has to be done by experiment, i.e. practice. none of the old masters got out a piece of paper and calculated how to do a punch, they worked it out through practice.

"Gently return to the simple physical sensation of the breath. Then do it again, and again, and again. Somewhere in this process, you will come face-to-face with the sudden and shocking realization that you are completely crazy. Your mind is a shrieking, gibbering madhouse on wheels." - ven. henepola gunaratana
Posted

That is one VERY TRUE statement, my friend.

Posted

Indeed. That doesn't mean that scientific proof doesn't work though.

The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...