IRKguy Posted December 4, 2006 Posted December 4, 2006 Traditionally, straight swords are good for duelling, broad swords for combat, if by combat you mean melee. Of course, slashing swords are better for mounted soldiers. Stabbing is better on the ground if you want to kill someone. However, combat isn't about killing someone. It's about getting out alive. A good slashing sword tends to make people not want to attack you and can attack many angles. A stabbing sword can attack only one person at a time. While you're killing that person, someone else can attack you. Maybe a good analogy is whether a sniper rifle or a machine gun is better in combat. If you want to kill a specific person, the snper rifle is better. In war, a snper's life expectancy is much shorther than a machine gunner's You have a right to your actionsBut never to your actions' fruits.Act for the action's sake,And do not be attached to inaction. Bhagvad Gita 2.47
Aigloblam Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 While both are efficent, i prefer the control of the straight sword. If you asked me to pick one weapon, and one weapon only, to use the rest of my life, i would choose a good weighted Machete, Capoeira style. Control for me is more important than anything else. I have nowhere near the power that most of my friends do, but i have more control and speed than all of them put togather, so usually i can pull off things that they think are impossible. For me the broadsword is more power than finess, while it can be alot harder to block, it takes alot more skill/talent to use a broadsword good enough to get the same abilities posessed by the straight sword. Non Omnis Moriar.Non Omnis Narcos.
bushido_man96 Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Does Caporiea use the machete as a weapon? What kind of training do you do with it? https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
baronbvp Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 Traditionally, straight swords are good for duelling, broad swords for combat, if by combat you mean melee. Of course, slashing swords are better for mounted soldiers. Stabbing is better on the ground if you want to kill someone. However, combat isn't about killing someone. It's about getting out alive. A good slashing sword tends to make people not want to attack you and can attack many angles. A stabbing sword can attack only one person at a time. While you're killing that person, someone else can attack you. I fenced with foil in high school, which is obviously a thrusting (stabbing) weapon. I have tried some moves with my Navy officer's cutlass. See a photo here: http://www.militarysabers.com/navy-officer-sword-hi.html. A history of this sword can be found here: http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/uniform_sword.htmWould you call a cutlass a straight sword? It's not curved like a cavalry saber, but rather a single-edged cutting and thrusting weapon designed to be used in close quarters aboard ship against - you guessed it - pirates. Obviously thesa are now purely ceremonial. I find the ornamental grip on the hilt roughs up my hand unless I wear a glove. Only as good as I make myself be, only as bad as I let myself be.Martial arts are like kinetic chess. Your move.
bushido_man96 Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 Well, Baron, the cutlass is much akin to the sabre, just smaller, I think, in blade width. Uses would be much the same, but the curvature would lend it more towards slashing, I would guess. You could thrust with it as well. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
baronbvp Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 My cutlass has no curve, but it is meant for slashing as well as thrusting. Maybe I should sharpen that baby up! The only thing I've ever cut with it was my wedding cake. Only as good as I make myself be, only as bad as I let myself be.Martial arts are like kinetic chess. Your move.
lordtariel Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I think straight sword and broadsword really need to be defined. They mean different things in the eastern and western world. There's no place like 127.0.0.1
bushido_man96 Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I think straight sword and broadsword really need to be defined. They mean different things in the eastern and western world.As far as Western weapons go, most of the swords where long swords (broad swords). Rarely were they curved, until the sabres came along. https://www.haysgym.comhttp://www.sunyis.com/https://www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com
baronbvp Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I thought a broad sword was a specific type of very large, two-handed, two-edged weapon. I'm thinking Highlander or Monty Python and the Holy Grail. No? Only as good as I make myself be, only as bad as I let myself be.Martial arts are like kinetic chess. Your move.
lordtariel Posted March 13, 2007 Posted March 13, 2007 I thought a broad sword was a specific type of very large, two-handed, two-edged weapon. I'm thinking Highlander or Monty Python and the Holy Grail. No? I believe western broadswords were traditionally one handed and had a wide blade.http://www.swordsdirect.com/cold-steel-horseman-basket-hilt-broadsword.html Chinese broadswords(Dao) were one handed, single edged, curved weapons: http://www.swordsdirect.com/paul_chen_swords.html while straight swords(Gim or Jian) were thin, flexible double bladed weapons: http://www.wle.com/products/W451-T.html There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now