elbows_and_knees Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 sparring techniques? have you read a book of five rings? It's about philosophy and strategy, not sparring techs. you can apply the strategy to what you do, but it will not blatantly give you techniques...I think it does actually in the "fire" section, involving swords.Example: How he used strategy to plan out an effective technique for an opponent. I would count it as sparring tactics, because he says exactly what he did and how it could be used on other situations.P.S. This was meant to be an edit the fire book is all about strategy and how to implement it:THREE METHODS TO FORESTALL THE ENEMYsen no kentai no sentai tai no senHe then goes into other points of his strategy:To hold down a pillowcrossing at a fordto know the timestread down a swordto know "collapse"become the enemy to release four handsto move the shadeto hold down a shadowto pass onto cause loss of balanceto frightento soak ininjure the cornersthrow into confusionminglecrushpenetrate the depthsthe mountain-sea changeto renewrat's head ox's neckcommander knows the troopslet go the hiltbody of a rockAny examples contained within he is using to illustrate a specific point of strategy, not a sparring technique. you mentioned tactics, however, which IS strategy. The poster said he was looking for sparring techniques.
Menjo Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 Ok, then somewhere in the book(to lazy to look), there was a story where he told a boy to use a specific sparring tactic to defeat a samurai. I said i thought it was in the fire section, however I was wrong, so to be safe, I'll use that story. However I dont see the point of re-writing all that, Yes yes, this story was probably not true, and yes it had a deeper meaning, skip all the "knows" and I THINK he mentioned a tactic.I would consider my post off topic, in response to your last sentence. "Time is what we want most, but what we use worst"William Penn
granmasterchen Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 i would say musashi......bruce lee just repeats the same things musashi and sun tsu said many years before his time and rewrote it out for the modern world and the modern use of martial arts, i don't see anything too special about that, anyone could have read those scrolls and then decided to do a comparison to how martial arts have evolved since then and how we use them now and what comparisons can we find and so on and you have his book....yep anyone could do that., no offense to anyone buy im just one of the many many many people that aren't huge bruce lee fans. That which does not destroy me will only make me stronger
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now